The simon effect and its reversal in three-choice Hedge and Marsh tasks: Evidence for irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility and stimulus congruity

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 1018-1037

  Zhang, Harry ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY KOKOMO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DECISION MAKING; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0034197935     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1018     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aldus Photostyler Version 2.0 [Computer Software]. (1994). Seattle, WA: Aldus Corporation.
2. Arend, U., & Wandmacher, J. (1987). On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks. Acta Psychologica, 65, 193-210.
3. Barber, P. J., O'Leary, M. J., & Simon, J. R. (1994). Defining stimulus congruity. A rejoinder to Guiard, Hasbroucq, and Possamai (1994). Psychological Research, 56, 213-215.
4. Cohen, J. D., Servan-Schreiber, D., & McClelland, J. L. (1992). A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 239-269.
5. Coles, M. G. N., Gehring, W. J., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Response activation and verification. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 779-792). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
7. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
8. Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
9. Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
10. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). SR compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
11. Georgopoulos, A. P., Lurito, J. T., Petrides, M., Schwartz, A. B., & Massey, J. T. (1989, January 13). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 243, 234-236.
12. Guiard, Y., Hasbroucq, T., & Possamai, C.-A. (1994). Stimulus congruity, irrelevant spatial SR correspondence, and display-control arrangement correspondence. Psychological Research, 56, 210-212.
13. Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
14. Hedge, A., & Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effects of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response-time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427-439.
15. Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
16. Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect. Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
17. Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1997). Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18. Ishihara, S. (1991). Ishihara's tests for colour-blindness, concise edition. Tokyo: Kanehara.
19. Kornblum, S. (1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In G. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 743-777). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130-135.
21. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
22. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). A study of stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
23. Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 183-197.
24. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 286-298.
25. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
26. McClelland, J. L. (1992). Toward a theory of information processing in grade, random, and interactive networks. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 14, pp. 655-688). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
28. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: II. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
29. Nicoletti, R., & Umilta, C. (1994). Attentional shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychological Research, 56, 144-150.
30. O'Leary, M. J., Barber, P. J., & Simon, J. R. (1994). Does stimulus correspondence account for the Simon effect? Comments on Hasbroucq and Guiard (1991). Psychological Research, 58, 203-209.
31. O'Leary, M. J., Barber, P. J., & Simon, J. R. (1995). Does stimulus correspondence account for the Simon effect? Comments on Hasbroucq and Guiard (1991): Erratum. Psychological Research, 56, 74.
32. Osman, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmission of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.
33. Phaf, R. H., Van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1990). SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273-341.
34. Proctor, R. W., & Lu, C.-H. (1994). Referential coding and attention-shifting accounts of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 56, 185-195.
35. Proctor, R. W., Lu, C.-H., Wang, H., & Dutta, A. (1995). Activation of response codes by relevant and irrelevant stimulus information. Acta Psychologica, 90, 275-286.
36. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
37. Proctor, R. W., Reeve, T. G., & Van Zandt, T. (1992). Salient-features coding in response selection. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 727-741). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
38. Ratcliff, R. J. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
39. Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (1997, November 28). Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science, 278, 1616-1619.
40. Riehle, A., Kornblum, S., & Requin, J. (1997). Neural correlates of sensorimotor association in stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1708-1726.
41. Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological Research, 59, 196-211.
42. Rubichi, S., Nicoletti, R., Iani, C., & Umilta, C. (1997). The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1353-1364.
43. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
44. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
45. Simon, J. R., Sly, P. E., & Vilapakkam, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reaction toward the stimulus source. Acta Psychologica, 47, 63-81.
46. Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M., Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 433-435.
47. Sternberg, S. (1969). On the discovery of processing stages: Some extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
48. Stoffels, E. J., Van der Molen, M. W., & Keuss, P. G. J. (1989). An additive factor analysis of the effect(s) of location cues associated with auditory stimuli on stages of information processing. Acta Psychologica, 70, 161-197.
49. Stoffer, T. H., & Umilta, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S-R compatibility and the Simon effect. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 181-208). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
50. Toth, J. P., Levine, B., Stuss, D. T., Oh, A., Winocur, G., & Meiran, A. (1995). Dissociation of processes underlying spatial S-R compatibility: Evidence for the independent influence of what and where. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 483-501.
51. Umilta, C. (Ed.). (1994). The Simon effect [Special issue]. Psychological Research, 56(3).
52. Umilta, C., & Liotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 81-90.
53. Umilta, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S-R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 11, pp. 457-471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Umilta, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
55. Umilta, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1992). An integrated model of the Simon effect. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approach to human cognition (pp. 331-350). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
56. Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.
57. Weeks, D. J., Chua, R., & Hamblin, K. (1996). Attention shifts and the Simon effect: A failure to replicate Stoffer (1991). Psychological Research, 58, 246-253.
58. Whitaker, L. A. (1979). Dual-task interference as a function of cognitive processing load. Acta Psychologica, 43, 71-84.
59. Zhang, H. (1994). Stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility: An interactive activation model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
60. Zhang, H. (1996). A further study on the Stroop effect: Early-selection, late-selection, or both? Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of the Social Sciences, 31, 130-136.
61. Zhang, H. (1997, November). Effects of stimulus-response compatibility and stimulus congruity in Hedge and Marsh tasks. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
62. Zhang, H., & Kornblum, S. (1998). The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 3-19.
63. Zhang, H., Kornblum, S., & Zhang, J. (1995). Utilization of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility principles in machine designs. In K. Cox, J. Marsh, & B. Anderson (Eds.), First international cognitive technology conference (pp. 151-157). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
64. Zhang, H., Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 386-432.
65. Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and -Lauber's (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1543-1551.
66. Zorzi, M., & Umilta, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193-205.