Between-dimension flanker effects: A clarification with encouraging implications

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 670-675

  Mordkoff, J Toby ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347178575     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03208843     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. COHEN, A., & SHOUP, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181.
2. COLES, M. G. H., GRATTON, G., BASHORE, T. R., ERIKSEN, C. W., & DONCHIN, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 529-553.
3. DEYOE, E. A., & VAN ESSEN, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 11, 219-226.
4. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
5. ERIKSEN, C. W., & SCHULTZ, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
6. GARNER, W. R. (1978). Aspects of a stimulus: Features, dimensions, and configurations. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 99-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. LAVIE, N. (1997). Visual feature integration and focused attention: Response competition from multiple distractor features. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 543-556.
8. MILLER, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279.
9. MILLER, J. (1987). Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 419-434.
10. MORDKOFF, J. T. (1996). Selective attention and internal constraints: There is more to the flanker effect than biased contingencies. In A. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. Logan (Eds.). Converging operalions in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 483-502). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. MORDKOFF, J. T., & MILLER, J. (1993). Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: The problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 527-535.
12. MORDKOFF, J. T., MILLER, J., & ROCH, A.-C. (1996). Absence of coactivation within the motor component: Evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 25-41.
13. MORDKOFF, J. T., & YANTIS, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 520-538.
14. MORDKOFF, J. T., & YANTIS, S. (1993). Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence of coactivation. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 357-366.
15. TREISMAN, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.