Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: Delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1829-1840

  Van Der Lubbe, Rob H J ^a,b   Vogel, Rutger O ^a   Postma, Albert ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; EYE FIXATION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 32844469822     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892905775008634     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial information in responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
2. Di Russo, F., Martínez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2001). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111.
3. Eimer, M. (1994). An ERP study on visual spatial priming with peripheral onsets. Psychophysiology, 31, 154-163.
4. Frith, C. D., & Done, D. J. (1986). Routes to action in reaction time tasks. Psychological Research, 48, 169-177.
5. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484.
6. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.
7. Handy, T. C., Jha, A. P., & Mangun, G. R. (1999). Evidence for an attention component in inhibition of return. Psychological Science, 10, 157-161.
8. Heinze, H. J., Mangun, G. R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Münte, T. F., Gos, A., Scherg, M., Johannes, S., Hundeshagen, H., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during selective attention in humans. Nature, 372, 543-546.
9. Henderson, L., & Dittrich, W. H. (1998). Preparing to react in absence of uncertainty: I. New perspectives on simple reaction time. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 531-554.
10. Hopf, J.-M., Vogel, E., Woodman, G., Heinze, H.-J., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2088-2095.
11. Hopfinger, J. B., & Mangun, G. R. (1998). Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex. Psychological Science, 9, 441-447.
12. Hopfinger, J. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2001). Tracking the influence of reflexive attention on sensory and cognitive processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 56-65.
13. Ilan, A. B., & Miller, J. O. (1999). A distinction between the initiation and continuation of response preparation. Psychophysiology, 36, 209-219.
14. Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 307-314.
15. Ivanoff, J., Klein, R. M., & Lupiáñez, J. (2002). Inhibition of return interacts with the Simon effect: An omnibus analysis and its implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 318-327.
16. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-146.
17. Klein, R. M., & Dick, B. (2002). Temporal dynamics of reflexive attention shifts: A dual-stream rapid serial visual presentation exploration. Psychological Science, 13, 176-179.
18. Klein, R. M., & Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Car (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. San Diego: Academic Press.
19. Low, K. A., & Miller, J. O. (1999). The usefulness of partial information: Effects of go probability in the choice/nogo task. Psychophysiology, 36, 288-297.
20. Lupiáñez, J., Milán, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1241-1254.
21. Lupiáñez, J., Miliken, B., Solano, C., Weaver, B., & Tipper, S. P. (2001). On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 753-773.
22. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1057-1074.
23. McDonald, J. J., Ward, L. M., & Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An event-related potential study of inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1411-1423.
24. Mordkoff, J. T., & Gianaros, P. J. (2000). Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: A comparison of available methods and procedures. Psychophysiology, 37, 347-360.
25. Osman, A., Moore, C. M., & Ulrich, R. (2003). Temporal organization of covert motor processes during response selection and preparation. Biological Psychology, 64, 47-75.
26. Pivik, R. T., Broughton, R. J., Coppola, R., Davidson, R. J., Fox, N., & Nuwer, M. R. (1993). Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of encephalographic activity in research contexts. Psychophysiology, 30, 547-558.
27. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In: H. Bouma and D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X (pp. 531-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Pratt, J., Kingstone, A., & Khoe, W. (1997). Inhibition of return in location- and identity-based choice decision tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 964-971.
29. Prime, D. J., & Ward, L. M. (2004). Inhibition of return from stimulus to response. Psychological Science, 15, 272-276.
30. Rinkenauer, G., Osman, A., Ulrich, R., Müller-Gethmann, H., & Mattes, S. (2004). On the locus of speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 261-282.
31. Schwarzenau, P., Falkenstein, M., Hoorman, J., & Hohsbein, J. (1998). A new method for the estimation of the onset of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 30, 110-117.
32. Tanaka, Y., & Shimojo, S. (1996). Location vs. feature: Reaction time reveals dissociation between two visual functions. Vision Research, 36, 2125-2140.
33. Tanaka, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Repetition priming reveals sustained facilitation and transient inhibition in reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1421-1435.
34. Taylor, T. L., & Donnelly, M. P. W. (2002). Inhibition of return for target discriminations: The effect of repeating discriminated and irrelevant stimulus dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 292-317.
35. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the causes and the effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 625-643.
36. Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Jaśkowski, P., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (2001). Influence of time pressure in a simple response task, a choice-by-location task, and the Simon task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 241-255.
37. Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Keuss, P. J. G., & Stoffels, E.-J. (1996). Threefold effect of peripheral precues: Alertness, orienting, and response tendencies. Acta Psychologica, 94, 319-337.
38. Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Los, S. A., Jaśkowski, P., & Verleger, R. (2004). Being prepared on time: On the importance of the previous foreperiod to current preparation, as reflected in speed, force and preparation-related brain potentials. Acta Psychologica, 116, 245-262.
39. Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37, 190-203.
40. Woldorff, M. G. (1993). Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: Analysis and correction. Psychophysiology, 30, 98-119.