Likelihoods from summary statistics: Recent divergence between species

Genetics

Volumn 171, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1419-1436

  Leman, Scotland C ^a   Chen, Yuguo ^a,c   Stajich, Jason E ^b   Noor, Mohamed A F ^a   Uyenoyama, Marcy K ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE;

ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; DROSOPHILA; GENEALOGY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SAMPLING; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; STATISTICS;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MUTATION;

DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA;

EID: 32544444406     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.040402     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. AKASHI, H., 1995 Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139: 1067-1076.
2. AQUADRO, C. F., A. L. WEAVER, S. W. SCHAEFFER and W. W. ANDERSON, 1991 Molecular evolution of inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura: the amylase region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 305-309.
3. ARBOGAST, B. S., S. V. EDWARDS, J. WAKELEY, P. BEERLI and J. B. SLOWINSKI, 2002 Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 707-740.
4. BEAUMONT, M. A., 2004 Recent developments in genetic data analysis: What can they tell us about human demographic history? Heredity 92: 365-379.
5. BEAUMONT, M. A., W. ZHANG and D. J. BALDING, 2002 Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics 162: 2025-2035.
6. BEERLI, P., and J. FELSENSTEIN, 2001 Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 4563-4568.
7. BERGER, J. O., B. LISEO and R. L. WOLPERT, 1999 Integrating likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance parameters. Stat. Sci. 14: 1-28.
8. BUSTAMANTE, C. D., R. NIELSEN and D. L. HARTL, 2002 A maximum likelihood method for analyzing pseudogene evolution: implications for silent site evolution in humans and rodents. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 110-117.
9. CROW, J. F., and C. DENNISTON, 1988 Inbreeding and variance effective population numbers. Evolution 42: 482-495.
10. DE BOOR, C., 2001 A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer-Verlag, New York.
11. DE IORIO, M., and R. C. GRIFFITHS, 2004 Importance sampling on coalescent histories. I. Adv. Appl. Probab. 36: 417-433.
12. DEPAULIS, F., and M. VEUILLE, 1998 Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 1788-1790.
13. DEPAULIS, F., S. MOUSSET and M. VEUILLE, 2001 Haplotype tests using coalescent simulations conditional on the number of segregating sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1136-1138.
14. DOBZHANSKY, T., and J. R. POWELL, 1975 Drosophila pseudoobscura and its American relatives, Drosophila persimilis and Drosophila miranda, pp. 537-587 in Invertebrates of Genetic Interest, edited by R. C. KING. Plenum Press, New York.
15. DOBZHANSKY, T., and C. C. TAN, 1936 Studies on hybrid sterility III. A comparison of the chromosome structure in two related species, Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila miranda. Z. Indukt. Abstammungs-Vererbungsl. 72: 88-113.
16. DONNELLY, P., and S. TAVARÉ, 1995 Coalescents and genealogical structure under neutrality. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29: 401-421.
17. ESTOUP, A., M. A. BEAUMONT, F. SENNEDOT, C. MORITZ and J.-M. CORNUET, 2004 Genetic analysis of complex demographic scenarios: spatially expanding populations for the cane toad, Bufo marinus. Evolution 58: 2021-2036.
18. EWENS, W. J., 1972 The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 3: 87-112.
19. FELSENSTEIN, J., 1992 Estimating effective population size from samples of sequences: inefficiency of pairwise and segregation sites as compared to phylogenetic estimates. Genet. Res. 59: 139-147.
20. FELSENSTEIN, J., M. K. KUHNER, J. YAMATO and P. BEERLI, 1999 Likelihoods on coalescents: a Monte Carlo sampling approach to inferring parameters from population samples of molecular data, pp. 163-185 in Statistics in Molecular Biology and Genetics, edited by F. SEILLIER-MOISEIWITSCH. Institute of Mathematical Statistics and American Mathematics Society, Haywood, CA.
21. FU, Y.-X., 1995 Statistical properties of segregating sites. Theor. Popul. Biol. 48: 172-197.
22. FU, Y.-X., and W.-H. LI, 1997 Estimating the age of the common ancestor of a sample of DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14: 195-199.
23. GENTLES, A. J., and S. KARLIN, 2001 Genome-scale compositional comparisons in eukaryotes. Genome Res. 11: 540-546.
24. GRIFFITHS, R. C., and S. TAVARÉ, 1994 Simulating probability distributions in the coalescent. Theor. Popul. Biol. 46: 131-159.
25. GRIFFITHS, R. C., and S. TAVARÉ, 1996 Monte Carlo inference methods in population genetics. Math. Comput. Model. 23: 141-158.
26. HAMILTON, G., M. CURRAT, N. RAY, G. HECKEL, M. A. BEAUMONT et al., 2005 Bayesian estimation of recent migration rates after a spatial expansion. Genetics 170: 409-417.
27. HEY, J., and C. A. MACHADO, 2003 The study of structured populations - new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 535-543.
28. HEY, J., and R. NIELSEN, 2004 Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 167: 747-760.
29. HUDSON, R. R., 1993 The how and why of generating gene genealogies, pp. 23-36 in Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution, edited by N. TAKAHATA and A. G. CLARK. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
30. HUELSENBECK, J. P., and F. RONQUIST, 2001 MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
31. KOSAKOVSKY POND, S. L., and S. D. W. FROST, 2005 A simple hierarchical approach to modeling distributions of substitution rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22: 223-234.
32. KUHNER, M. K., J. YAMATO and J. FELSENSTEIN, 1995 Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics 140: 1421-1430.
33. KUHNER, M. K., J. YAMATO and J. FELSENSTEIN, 1998 Maximum-likelihood estimation of population growth rates based on the coalescent. Genetics 149: 429-434.
34. LIU, J. S., 2001 Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing. Springer-Verlag, New York.
35. MACHADO, C. A., R. M. KLIMAN, J. A. MARKERT and J. HEY, 2002 Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 472-488.
36. MARJORAM, P., J. MOLITOR, V. PLAGNOL and S. TAVARÉ, 2003 Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 15324-15328.
37. MARKOVTSOVA, L., P. MARJORAM and S. TAVARÉ, 2001 On a test by Depaulis and Veuille. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1132-1133.
38. NAVARRO, A., E. BETRÁN, A. BARBADILLA and A. RUIZ, 1997 Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterozygotes. Genetics 146: 695-709.
39. NICHOLS, R., 2001 Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 358-364.
40. NIELSEN, R., 1998 Maximum likelihood estimation of population divergence times and population phylogenies under the infinite sites model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 53: 143-151.
41. NIELSEN, R., and J. WAKELEY, 2001 Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158: 885-896.
42. NOOR, M. A. F., and K. R. SMITH, 2000 Recombination, statistical power, and genetic studies of sexual isolation in Drosophila. J. Hered. 91: 99-103.
43. NOOR, M. A. F., K. L. GRAMS, L. A. BERTUCCI, Y. ALMENDAREZ, J. REILAND et al., 2001a The genetics of reproductive isolation and the potential for gene exchange between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis via backcross hybrid males. Evolution 55: 512-521.
44. NOOR, M. A. F., K. L. GRAMS, L. A. BERTUCCI and J. REILAND, 2001b Chromosomal inversions and reproductive isolation of species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12084-12088.
45. PIONTKIVSKA, H., 2004 Efficiencies of maximum likelihood methods of phylogenetic inferences when different substitution models are used. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31: 865-873.
46. PRITCHARD, J. K., M. T. SEIELSTAD, A. PEREZ-LEZAUN and M. W. FELDMAN, 1999 Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y chromosome microsatellites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 1791-1798.
47. RANNALA, B., and Z. YANG, 2003 Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164: 1645-1656.
48. ROSENBERG, N. A., and M. W. FELDMAN, 2002 The relationship between coalescence times and population divergence times, pp. 130-164 in Modern Developments in Theoretical Population Genetics - The Legacy of Gustave Malécot, edited by M. SLATKIN and M. VEUILLE. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. SCHAEFFER, S. W., 1995 Population genetics in Drosophila pseudoobscura: a synthesis based on nucleotide sequence data for the Adh gene, pp. 329-352 in Genetics of Natural Populations: The Continuing Importance of Theodosius Dobzhansky, edited by L. LEVINE. Columbia University Press, New York.
50. SLATKIN, M., 1991 Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times. Genet. Res. 58: 167-175.
51. SLATKIN, M., and B. RANNALA, 1997 Estimating the age of alleles by use of intraallelic variability. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60: 447-458.
52. SLATKIN, M., and B. RANNALA, 2000 Estimating allele age. Annu. Rev. Genomics 1: 225-249.
53. STAJICH, J. E., D. BLOCK, K. BOULEZ, S. E. BRENNER, S. A. CHERVITZ et al., 2002 The Bioperl toolkit: Perl modules for the life sciences. Genome Res. 12: 1611-1618.
54. STEPHENS, M., 2001 Inference under the coalescent, pp. 213-238 in Handbook of Statistical Genetics, edited by D. J. BALDING, M. J. BISHOP and C. CANNINGS. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
55. STEPHENS, M., and P. DONNELLY, 2000 Inference in molecular population genetics. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 62: 605-635.
56. SUBRAMANIAN, S., and S. KUMAR, 2003 Neutral substitutions occur at a faster rate in exons than in noncoding DNA in primate genomes. Genome Res. 13: 838-844.
57. SVED, J., and A. BIRD, 1990 The expected equilibrium of the CpG dinucleotide in vertebrate genomes under a mutation model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 4692-4696.
58. TAKAHASHI, K., and M. NEI, 2000 Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference underthe criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 1251-1258.
59. TAKAHATA, N., and Y. SATTA, 2002 Pre-speciation coalescence and the effective size of ancestral populations, pp. 52-71 in Modern Developments in Theoretical Population Genetics - The Legacy of Gustave Malécot, edited by M. SLATKIN and M. VEUILLE. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
60. TAKAHATA, N., Y. SATTA and J. KLEIN, 1995 Divergence time and population size in the lineage leading to modern humans. Theor. Popul. Biol. 48: 198-221.
61. TAKEBAYASHI, N., E. NEWBIGIN and M. K. UYENOYAMA, 2004 Maximum-likelihood estimation of rates of recombination within mating-type regions. Genetics 167: 2097-2109.
62. TALLMON, D. A., G. LUIKART and M. A. BEAUMONT, 2004 Quantitative evaluation of a new effective population size estimator based on approximate Bayesian computation. Genetics 167: 977-988.
63. TAMURA, K., S. SUBRAMANIAN and S. KUMAR, 2004 Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 36-44.
64. TAVARÉ, S., D. J. BALDING, R. C. GRIFFITHS and P. DONNELLY, 1997 Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data. Genetics 145: 505-518.
65. THOMPSON, J. D., D. G. HIGGINS and T. J. GIBSON, 1994 CLUSTALW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
66. TURELLI, M., N. H. BARTON and J. A. COYNE, 2001 Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 330-343.
67. UYENOYAMA, M. K., and N. TAKEBAYASHI, 2004 A simple method for computing exact probabilities of mutation numbers. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65: 271-284.
68. WAKELEY, J., and J. HEY, 1997 Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics 145: 847-855.
69. WAKELEY, J., R. NIELSEN, S. N. LIU-CORDERO and K. ARDLIE, 2001 The discovery of single-nucleotide polymorphisms - and inferences about human demographic history. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69: 1332-1347.
70. WALL, J. D., 2003 Estimating ancestral population sizes and divergence times. Genetics 163: 395-404.
71. WALL, J. D., and R. R. HUDSON, 2001 Coalescent simulations and statistical tests of neutrality. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1134-1135.
72. WALL, J. D., P. ANDOLFATTO and M. PRZEWORSKI, 2002 Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 162: 203-216.
73. WANG, R. L., J. WAKELEY and J. HEY, 1997 Gene flow and natural selection in the origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Genetics 147: 1091-1106.
74. WATTERSON, G. A., 1975 On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7: 256-276.
75. WATTERSON, G. A., 1985 The genetic divergence of two populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 27: 298-317.
76. WEISS, G., and A. VON HAESELER, 1998 Inference of population history using a likelihood approach. Genetics 149: 1539-1546.
77. WILSON, I. J., and D. J. BALDING, 1998 Genealogical inference from microsatellite data. Genetics 150: 499-510.
78. WILSON, I. J., M. E. WEALE and D. J. BALDING, 2003 Inferences from DNA data: population histories, evolutionary processes and forensic match probabilities. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 166: 155-201.
79. WIUF, C., 2003 Inferring population history from genealogical trees. J. Math. Biol. 46: 241-264.
80. WIUF, C., and P. DONNELLY, 1999 Conditional genealogies and the age of a neutral mutant. Theor. Popul. Biol. 56: 183-201.
81. YANG, Z., 1996 Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42: 587-596.