Challenges in the implementation of success for all in four high-need urban schools

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 333-349

  Klingner, Janette ^a   Cramer, Elizabeth ^b   Harry, Beth ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31944440282     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/503635     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Borman, G. D., & Hewes, G. M. (2001). The longterm effects and cost-effectiveness of Success for All Baltimore: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.
2. Clarke, P. A. (2001). Analysis of Success for All and school development programs and their effects on reading comprehension. Unpublished master's thesis, Kean University, Union, NJ.
3. Fashola, O. S., & Slavin, R. E. (1998). Schoolwide reform models: What works? Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 370-379.
4. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory, Chicago: Aldine.
5. Harry, B., & Klingner, J. K. (2006). Why are so many students in special education? Understanding race and disability in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Harry, B., Sturges, K., & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Qualitative data analysis: Mapping the process. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3-13.
7. Heller, K. A., Holtzman, W. H., & Messick, S. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy press.
8. Herman, R., Carl, B., Lampron, S., Sussman, A., Berger, A., & Innes, F. (2000). What we know about comprehensive school reform models. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
9. Joyce, B. R. (1999). The great literacy problem and Success for All. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(2), 129-131.
10. Klingner, J. K., Ahwee, S., Pilonieta, P., & Menendez., R (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 411-429.
11. Klingner, J. K., Arguëlles, M. E., Hughes, M. T., & Vaughn, S. (2001). Examining the schoolwide "spread" of research-based practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24(4), 2221-2234.
12. Klingner, J. K., Sturges, K., & Harry B, (2003). Conducting ethnographic classroom observations of literacy instruction. In S. Vaughn & K. Briggs (Eds.), Reading in the classroom: Systems for observing teaching and learning (pp. 145-177). Baltimore: Brookes.
13. Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Arguëlles, M. E., Hughes, M. T., & Ahwee, S. (2004). Collaborative strategic reading: "Real world" lessons from classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 291-302.
14. Klingner, J. K., Vaughn S., Hughes, M. T., & Arguëlles, M. E. (1999). Sustaining researchbased practices in reading: A 3-year followup. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 263-274.
15. LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in education research. (2d ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
16. Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3-12.
17. Levitt, J. (2000). An interim evaluation of operation safety net: Three-year report. Miami: MiamiDade County Public Schools, Office of Evaluation and Research.
18. Madden., N. A., Slavin, R. E., Christie, N., & Karpouzis, K. P. (2001). Success for All alignment with Stanford Achievement Test: Ninth edition. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
19. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction [On-line]. Available: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.pdf
20. Pogrow, S. (1998). What is an exemplary program and why should anyone care? A reaction to Slavin and Klein. Educational Researcher, 27(7), 22-28.
21. Pogrow, S. (1999). Rejoinder: Consistent large gains and high levels of achievement are the best measures of program quality: Pogrow responds to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 28(8), 24-26.
22. Pogrow, S. (2002). Success for All is a failure. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(6), 463-468.
23. Pressley, M., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1997). What we know about translating comprehensionstrategies instruction research into practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 486-488.
24. Slavin, R. E. (1999). Rejoinder: Yes, control groups are essential in program evaluation: A response to Pogrow. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 36-38.
25. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. (1999). Effects of bilingual and English as a Second Language adaptations for Success for All on the reading achievement of students acquiring English. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 4, 393-416.
26. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2001a, April). Reducing the gap: Success for All and the achievement of African-American and Latino students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
27. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A.(2001b). Success for All and Comprehensive School Reform: Evidencebased policies for urban education. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
28. Slavin, R. E., Madden., N. A., Dolan, L., & Wasik, B. (1996). Success for All: A summary of research. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1, 41-76.
29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Stringfield, S., Millsap, M., & Herman, R. (1997). Special strategies for educating disadvantaged children: Results and policy implications. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
31. Urdegar, S. (2000). Evaluation of the Success for All program: 1998-1999. Miami: Miami-Dade County Public schools, Office of Evaluation and Research.
32. Walberg, H. J., & Greenberg, R. C. (1999). Educators should require evidence. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 132-135.
33. Wells, L. R., Blendinger, J., & Greene, D. (2000, November). An investigation of the Success for All reading program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY