The effects of genetic variation at r, rb and Tri loci in Pisum sativum L. on apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in young broilers

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 436-444

  Wiseman, Julian ^a   Al Marzooqi, Waleed ^a,c   Hedley, Cliff ^b   Wang, Trevor L ^b   Welham, Tracey ^b   Domoney, Claire ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b JOHN INNES CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY   (Oman)

Author keywords

Amino acid digestibility; Near isogenic lines; Peas; Poultry; Trypsin inhibitor

Indexed keywords

PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 31444447934     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2403     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Kooistra E, On the differences between smooth and three types of wrinkled peas. Euphytica 11:357-373 (1962).
2. Bhattacharyya MK, Smith AM, Ellis THN, Hedley CL and Martin CR, The wrinkled-seed character of pea described by Mendel is caused by a transposon-like insertion in a gene encoding starch-branching enzyme. Cell 60:115-122 (1990).
3. Hylton C and Smith AM, The rb mutation of peas causes structural and regulatory changes in ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase from developing embryos. Plant Physiol 99:1626-1634 (1992).
4. Wang TL and Hedley CL, Genetic and developmental analysis of the seed, in Peas: Genetics, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, ed. by Casey R and Davies DR. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 83-120 (1993).
5. a locus and legumin synthesis in Pisum sativum. Biochem Gen 18:1207-1219 (1980).
6. Perez L, Fernandez-Figares I, Nieto R, Aguilera JF and Prieto C, Amino acid ileal digestibility of some grain legume seeds in growing chickens. Anim Prod 56:261-267 (1993).
7. Turner SR, Barratt DHP and Casey R, The effect of different alleles at the r locus on the synthesis of seed storage proteins in Pisum sativum. Plant Mol Biol 14:793-803 (1990).
8. Domoney C, Welham T and Sidebottom C, Purification and characterisation of Pisum seed trypsin inhibitors. J Exp Bot 44:701-709 (1993).
9. Domoney C, Welham T, Sidebottom C and Firmin JL, Multiple isoforms of Pisum trypsin inhibitors result from modification of two primary gene products. FEBS Lett 360:15-20 (1995).
10. Ferrasson E, Quillien L and Gueguen J, Proteinase inhibitors form pea seeds: purification and characterisation. J Agric Food Chem 45:127-131 (1997).
11. Al-Wesali M, Lambert N, Welham T and Domoney C, The influence of pea seed trypsin inhibitors on the in vitro digestibility of casein. J Sci Food Agric 68:431-437 (1995).
12. Leterme P, Beckers Y and Thewis A, Trypsin inhibitors in peas: varietal effect and influence on digestibility of crude protein by growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 29:45-55 (1990).
13. Domoney C and Welham T, Trypsin inhibitors in Pisum: variation in amount and pattern of accumulation in developing seed. Seed Sci Res 2:147-154 (1992).
14. Wang XF, Warkentin TD, Briggs CJ, Oomah BD, Campbell CG and Woods S, Trypsin inhibitor activity in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). J Agric Food Chem 46:2620-2623 (1998).
15. Bacon JR, Lambert N, Matthews P, Arthur AE and Duchene C, Genotype, environment and genotype x environment effects on trypsin-inhibitor in peas. J Sci Food Agric 67:101-108 (1995).
16. Pisulewska E and Pisulewski PM, Trypsin inhibitor activity of legume seeds (peas, chickling vetch, lentils, and soya beans) as affected by the technique of harvest. Anim Feed Sci Technol 86:261-265 (2000).
17. Page D, Aubert G, Duc G, Welham T and Domoney C, Combinatorial variation in coding and promoter sequences of genes at the Tri locus in Pisum sativum accounts for variation in trypsin inhibitor activity in seeds. Mol Genet Genomics 267:359-369 (2002).
18. Page D, Duc G, Lejeune-Henaut I and Domoney C, Marker-assisted selection of genetic variants for seed trypsin inhibitor content in peas. Pisum Genet 35:19-21 (2003).
19. Carré B and Conan L, Relationship between trypsin-inhibitor content of pea seeds and pea protein digestibility in poultry, in Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds, ed. by Huisman J, van der Poel AFB and Liener IE. PUDOC, Wageningen, pp 103-106 (1989).
20. Crevieu I, Carre B, Chagneau A-M, Quillien L, Guegen J and Berot S, Identification of resistant pea (Pisum sativum L.) proteins in the digestive tract of chickens. J Agric Food Chem 45:1295-1300 (1997).
21. Clemente A, MacKenzie DA, Jeenes DJ and Domoney C, The effect of variation within inhibitory domains on the activity of pea protease inhibitors from the Bowman-Birk class. Protein Express Purif 36:106-114 (2004).
22. Muel F, Carrouée B and Grosjean F, Trypsin inhibitor activity of pea cultivars: new data and a proposal strategy for breeding programmes, in Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Grain Legumes, AEP, Valladolid, Spain, pp 164-165 (1998).
23. Wareham CN, Wiseman J and Cole DJA, The influence of faba bean tannins on male broiler chicks: evaluation of hulls from white- and coloured-flowered cultivars and of near-isogenic lines. J Agric Sci (Cambs) 121:427-436 (1993).
24. Short FJ, Wiseman J and Boorman KN, Application of a method to determine ileal digestibility in broilers of amino acids in wheat. Anim Feed Sci Technol 79:195-209 (1999).
25. Wiseman J, Al-Mazooqi W, Welham T and Domoney C, The apparent ileal digestibility, determined with young broilers, of amino acids in near-isogenic lines of peas (Pisum sativum L.) differing in trypsin inhibitor activity. J Sci Food Agric 83:644-651 (2003).
26. Short FJ, Wiseman J and Boorman KN, The effect of the 1B/1R translocation and endosperm texture on amino acid digestibility in near-isogenic lines of wheat for broilers. J Agric Sci (Cambs) 134:69-76 (2000).
27. Hedley CL, Lloyd JR, Ambrose MJ and Wang TL, An analysis of seed development in Pisum sativum. XVII. The effect of the rb locus alone and in combination with r on the growth and development of the seed. Ann Bot 74:365-371 (1994).
28. Hedemann MS, Welham T, Boisen S, Canibe N, Bilham L and Domoney C, Studies on the biological responses of rats to seed trypsin inhibitors using near-isogenic lines of Pisum sativum L (pea). J Sci Food Agric 79:1647-1653 (1999).
29. Ellis THN, Domoney C, Castleton J, Cleary W and Davies DR, Vicilin genes of Pisum. Mol Gen Genet 205:164-169 (1986).
30. Schroeder HE, Quantitative studies on the cotyledonary proteins in the genus Pisum. J Sci Food Agric 33:623-633 (1982).
31. Gueguen J and Barbot J, Quantitative and qualitative variability of pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein composition. J Sci Food Agric 42:209-224 (1988).
32. Baja S, Mickelsen O, Lillevik HA, Baker LR, Bergen WG and Gill JC, Prediction of protein efficiency ratio of peas from their albumin content. Crop Sci 11:813-815 (1971).
33. Boulter D and Derbyshire E, Taxonomic aspects of the structure of legume proteins, in Chemotaxonomy of the Leguminoseae, ed. by Harborne JB, Boulter D and Turner BL. Academic Press, London, pp 285-308 (1971).
34. Li S, Sauer WC and Fan MZ, The effect of dietary crude protein level on amino acid digestibility in early-weaned pigs. J Anim Phys Anim Nutr 70:26-37 (1993).
35. McNab JM, Measuring availability of amino acids from digestibility experiments, in Proceedings of the Seventh European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition. World's Poultry Science Association, Girona, Spain, pp 45-53 (1989).
36. Fan MZ, Sauer WC, Hardin RT and Lein KA, Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs: effect of dietary amino acid level. J Anim Sci 72:2851-2859 (1994).
37. Angkanaporn K, Ravindran V and Bryden WL, Influence of caecectomy and dietary protein concentration on apparent excreta amino acid digestibility in adult cockerels. Br Poult Sci 38:270-276 (1997).
38. Donkoh A and Moughan PJ, The effect of crude protein content on apparent and true ileal nitrogen and amino acid digestibilities. Br J Nutr 72:59-68 (1994).
39. Eggum BO, A study of certain factors influencing protein utilisation in feedstuffs in rats and pigs. PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (1973).
40. Gatel F, Protein quality of legume seeds for non-ruminant animals: a literature review. Anim Feed Sci Tech 45:317-348 (1994).
41. Huisman J and Tolman GH, Antinutritional factors in the plant proteins of diets for non-ruminants, in Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, ed. by Garnsworthy PC, Haresign W and Cole DJA. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 3-31 (1992).
42. Bengala-Freire J, Aumaitre A and Peiniau J, Effects of feeding raw and extruded peas on ileal digestibility, pancreatic enzymes and plasma glucose and insulin in early weaned pigs. J Anim Phys Anim Nutr 65:154-164 (1991).
43. Grosjean F, Jondreville C, Williatte-Hazouard I, Skiba F, Carrouée B and Gatel F, Ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids of feed peas with different trypsin inhibitor activity in pigs. Can J Anim Sci 80:643-652 (2000).