Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 111-117

  Smith, Marilyn Chapnik ^a   Besner, Derek ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; READING; RECALL; SEMANTICS;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0035291738     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196146     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ALLPORT, D. A., STYLES, E. A., & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and non-conscious information processing (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
2. BALOTA, D., & ABRAMS, R. (1995). Mental chronometry: Beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1289-1302.
3. BAUER, B., & BESNER, D. (1997). Processing in the Stroop task: Mental set as a determinant of performance. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 61-68.
4. BECKER, C. A. (1979). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 252-259.
5. BECKER, C. A., & KILLION, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 389-401.
6. BESNER, D., & SMITH, M. C. (1992). Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 468-482.
7. BESNER, D., SMITH, M. C., & MACLEOD, C. M. (1990). Visual word recognition: A dissociation of lexical and semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 862-869.
8. BESNER, D., & STOLZ, J. A. (1999). Unconsciously controlled processing: The Stroop effect reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 449-455.
9. BESNER, D., STOLZ, J. A., & BOUTILIER, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221-225.
10. BLUM, T. L., & JOHNSON, N. F. (1993). The effect of semantic priming on the detection of letters within words. Memory & Cognition, 21, 389-396.
11. BOROWSKY, R., & BESNER, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 815-840.
12. BUCHANAN, L., & BESNER, D. (1993). Reading aloud: Evidence for the use of a whole word nonsemantic pathway. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 133-152.
13. CHIAPPE, P. R., SMITH, M. C., & BESNER, D. (1996). Semantic priming in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domains of processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 249-253.
14. COLLINS, A. M., & LOFTUS, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
15. FORSTER, K. I. (1999). The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain & Language, 68, 5-15.
16. FRIEDRICH, F. J., HENIK, A., & TZELGOV, J. (1991). Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 792-806.
17. HENIK, A., FRIEDRICH, F. J., TZELGOV, J., & TRAMER, S. (1994). Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Memory & Cognition, 22, 157-168.
18. HERDMAN, C. M., CHERNECKI, D., & NORRIS, D. (1999). Naming cAsE aLtErNaTeD words. Memory & Cognition, 27, 254-266.
19. JOHNSTON, J. C. (1981). Understanding word perception: Clues from studying the word superiority effect. In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology (pp. 65-81 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. KRUEGER, L. E., & WEISS, M. E. (1976). Letter search through words and nonwords: The effect of fixed, absent, or mutilated targets. Memory & Cognition, 4, 200-206.
21. MASSON, M. E. J. (1991). A distributed memory model of context effects in word identification. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 233-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. MASSON, M. E. J. (1999). Semantic priming in a recurrent network: Comment on Dalrymple-Alford and Marmurek (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 776-794.
23. MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 3-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactiveactivation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
25. MCRAE, K., & BOISVERT, S. (1998). Automatic semantic similarity priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 558-572.
26. MEYER, D. E., SCHVANEVELDT, R. W., & RUDDY, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effect on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V (pp. 98-118). New York: Academic Press.
27. MORTON, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
28. NEELY, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. NEELY, J. H., & KAHAN, T. (2001). Is semantic activation automatic? A critical reevaluation. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 69-93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30. PAAP, K. R., NEWSOME, S. L., MCDONALD, J. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
31. PLOURDE, C. E., & BESNER, D. (1997). On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 181-194.
32. SCARBOROUGH, D. L., CORTESE, C., & SCARBOROUGH, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 1-17.
33. SMITH, M. C., MEIRAN, N., & BESNER, D. (2000). On the interaction between linguistic and pictorial systems in the absence of semantic mediation: Evidence from a priming task. Memory & Cognition, 28, 204-213.
34. SMITH, M. C., THEODOR, L., & FRANKLIN, P. E. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 697-712.
35. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' methods. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
36. STERNBERG, S. (1998). Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 4. Methods, models, and conceptual issues (pp. 703-863). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. STOLZ, J. A., & BESNER, D. (1996). Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1166-1177.
38. STOLZ, J. A., & BESNER, D. (1998). Levels of representation in visual word recognition: A dissociation between morphological and semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1642-1655.
39. STOLZ, J. A., & NEELY, J. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 596-611.
40. STOLZ, J. A., ROBIDOUX, S., & BESNER, D. (2001). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: A simulation approach. Manuscript under revision.
41. TAFT, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. ZIEGLER, J. C., VAN ORDEN, G. C., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 845-860.