A long-distance stereoscopic detector for partially occluding surfaces

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 8-9, 2006, Pages 1180-1186

  Mitsudo, Hiroyuki ^a   Nakamizo, Sachio ^b   Ono, Hiroshi ^c  

^a ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Binocularly unmatched elements; External noise; Phantom occluder; Stereoscopic detector; Threshold contrast

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 30444448694     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. B. Dresp, and C. Bonnet Sub-threshold summation with illusory contours Vision Research 35 1995 1071 1078
2. B. Gillam, and K. Nakayama Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone Vision Research 39 1999 109 112
3. J.M. Gold, R.F. Murray, P.J. Bennett, and A.B. Sekuler Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours Current Biology 10 2000 663 666
4. S. Grossberg, and E. Mingolla Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading Psychological Review 92 1985 173 211
5. P.M. Grove, B. Gillam, and H. Ono Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms Vision Research 42 2002 1859 1870
6. W.L. Gulick, and R.B. Lawson Human Stereopsis: A Psychophysical Analysis 1976 Oxford University Press New York
7. J. Häkkinen, and G. Nyman Phantom surface captures stereopsis Vision Research 41 2001 187 199
8. I.P. Howard, and B.J. Rogers Binocular Vision and Stereopsis 1995 Oxford University Press New York
9. C. Kaernbach Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method Perception and Psychophysics 49 1991 227 229
10. R.P. Kohly, and D. Regan Long-distance interactions in cyclopean vision Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 268 2001 213 219
11. R.P. Kohly, and D. Regan Fast long-range interactions in the early processing of luminance-defined form Vision Research 42 2002 49 63
12. R.P. Kohly, and D. Regan Fast long-distance interactions in the early processing of motion-defined form and of combinations of motion-defined, luminance-defined, and cyclopean form Vision Research 42 2002 969 980
13. D.D. Landers, and L.K. Cormack Asymmetries and errors in perception of depth from disparity suggest a multicomponent model of disparity processing Perception and Psychophysics 59 1997 219 231
14. L. Liu, S.B. Stevenson, and C.M. Schor Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence Nature 367 1994 66 69
15. Z.L. Lu, and B.A. Dosher Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise Journal of the Optical Society of America A 16 1999 764 778
16. Z.L. Lu, and B.A. Dosher Spatial attention: different mechanisms for central and peripheral temporal precues? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 2000 1534 1548
17. N.A. Macmillan, and C.D. Creelman Detection Theory: A User's Guide 1991 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
18. H. Mitsudo, S. Nakamizo, and H. Ono Greater depth seen with phantom stereopsis is coded at the early stages of visual processing Vision Research 45 2005 1365 1374
19. K. Nakayama, and S. Shimojo Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points Vision Research 30 1990 1811 1825
20. J. Palmer, P. Verghese, and M. Pavel The psychophysics of visual search Vision Research 40 2000 1227 1268
21. D.G. Pelli, and B. Farell Why use noise? Journal of the Optical Society of America A 16 1999 647 653
22. D.G. Pelli, B. Farell, and D.C. Moore The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition Nature 423 2003 752 756
23. J.G. Robson, and N. Graham Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field Vision Research 21 1981 409 418
24. J.J. Tsai, and J.D. Victor Neither occlusion constraint nor binocular disparity accounts for the perceived depth in the 'sieve effect' Vision Research 40 2000 2265 2276
25. J.J. Tsai, and J.D. Victor Binocular depth perception from unpaired image points need not depend on scene organization Vision Research 45 2005 527 532