Greater depth seen with phantom stereopsis is coded at the early stages of visual processing

Vision Research

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1365-1374

  Mitsudo, Hiroyuki ^a,b   Nakamizo, Sachio ^c   Ono, Hiroshi ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

^c KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Binocularly unmatched features; Stereo noise; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 14644393698     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Y. Bonneh, and D. Sagi Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry Vision Research 39 1999 271 281
2. M. Carrasco, S. Ling, and S. Read Attention alters appearance Nature Neuroscience 7 2004 308 313
3. M. Cook, and B. Gillam Depth of monocular elements in a binocular scene: the conditions for da Vinci stereopsis Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 2004 92 103
4. G. Davis, and J. Driver Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system Nature 371 1994 791 793
5. B.A. Dosher, S. Han, and Z.L. Lu Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 2004 3 27
6. M.P. Eckstein The lower visual search efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing Psychological Science 9 1998 111 118
7. M.P. Eckstein, J.P. Thomas, J. Palmer, and S.S. Shimozaki A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays Perception & Psychophysics 62 2000 425 451
8. M. Edwards, D.R. Pope, and C.M. Schor Orientation tuning of the transient-stereopsis system Vision Research 39 1999 2717 2727
9. M. Edwards, and C.M. Schor Depth aliasing by the transient-stereopsis system Vision Research 39 1999 4333 4340
10. J.T. Enns, and R.A. Rensink Preattentive recovery of three-dimensional orientation from line drawings Psychological Review 98 1991 335 351
11. K.R. Gegenfurtner, and D.C. Kiper Contrast detection in luminance and chromatic noise Journal of the Optical Society of America A 9 1992 1880 1888
12. B. Gillam, S. Blackburn, and K. Nakayama Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: Metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours Vision Research 39 1999 493 502
13. B. Gillam, M. Cook, and S. Blackburn Monocular discs in the occlusion zones of binocular surfaces do not have quantitative depth-a comparison with Panum's limiting case Perception 32 2003 1009 1019
14. B. Gillam, and K. Nakayama Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone Vision Research 39 1999 109 112
15. P.M. Grove, B. Gillam, and H. Ono Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms Vision Research 42 2002 1859 1870
16. W.L. Gulick, and R.B. Lawson Human Stereopsis: A Psychophysical Analysis 1976 Oxford University Press New York
17. J. Häkkinen, and G. Nyman Phantom surface captures stereopsis Vision Research 41 2001 187 199
18. R. Hayashi, T. Maeda, S. Shimojo, and S. Tachi An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry Vision Research 44 2004 2367 2380
19. R. Hayashi, Y. Miyawaki, T. Maeda, and S. Tachi Unconscious adaptation: a new illusion of depth induced by stimulus features without depth Vision Research 43 2003 2773 2782
20. I.P. Howard Depth from binocular rivalry without spatial disparity Perception 24 1995 67 74
21. J.S. Joseph, M.M. Chun, and K. Nakayama Attentional requirements in a "preattentive" feature search task Nature 379 1997 805 807
22. C. Kaernbach Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method Perception & Psychophysics 49 1991 227 229
23. D. Kuroki, and S. Nakamizo The effects of convergence and viewing distance on perceived depth of phantom stereopsis Vision 16 2004 69 82 (in Japanese with English abstract)
24. D.D. Landers, and L.K. Cormack Asymmetries and errors in perception of depth from disparity suggest a multicomponent model of disparity processing Perception & Psychophysics 59 1997 219 231
25. P. Lennie Single units and visual cortical organization Perception 27 1998 889 935
26. N.A. Macmillan, and C.D. Creelman Detection Theory: A User's Guide 1991 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
27. M.L. Manning, D.C. Finlay, R.A. Neill, and B.G. Frost Detection threshold differences to crossed and uncrossed disparities Vision Research 27 1987 1683 1686
28. K. Nakayama, and S. Shimojo Da Vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points Vision Research 30 1990 1811 1825
29. A.J. O'Toole, and C.L. Walker On the preattentive accessibility of stereoscopic disparity: Evidence from visual search Perception & Psychophysics 59 1997 202 218
30. J. Palmer, P. Verghese, and M. Pavel The psychophysics of visual search Vision Research 40 2000 1227 1268
31. M.J. Pianta, and B.J. Gillam Paired and unpaired features can be equally effective in human depth perception Vision Research 43 2003 1 6
32. M.J. Pianta, and B.J. Gillam Monocular gap stereopsis: Manipulation of the outer edge disparity and the shape of the gap Vision Research 43 2003 1937 1950
33. R.A. Rensink, and J.T. Enns Early completion of occluded objects Vision Research 38 1998 2489 2505
34. A. Treisman, and S. Gormican Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries Psychological Review 95 1988 15 48
35. J.J. Tsai, and J.D. Victor Neither occlusion constraint nor binocular disparity accounts for the perceived depth in the 'sieve effect' Vision Research 40 2000 2265 2276
36. R. VanRullen, L. Reddy, and C. Koch Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16 2004 4 14
37. J.M. Wolfe Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1 1994 202 238
38. J.M. Wolfe, and S.L. Franzel Binocularity and visual search Perception & Psychophysics 44 1988 81 93
39. G.F. Woodman, and S.J. Luck Serial deployment of attention during visual search Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 2003 121 138