Neither occlusion constraint nor binocular disparity accounts for the perceived depth in the 'sieve effect'

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 17, 2000, Pages 2265-2276

  Tsai, Jeffrey J ^a   Victor, Jonathan D ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Ecological optics; Matching; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; ADULT; BIOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIXATION FAILURE; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0033649114     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00100-0     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson, B. L. (1994). The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis. Nature, 367, 365-368.
2. Barlow, H. B., Blakemore, C., & Pettigrew, J. D. (1967). The neural mechanisms of binocular depth discrimination. Journal of Physiology, 193, 327-342.
3. Blake, R., & Wilson, H. R. (1991). Neural models of stereoscopic vision. Trends in Neuroscience, 14, 445-452.
4. Burkitt, G. R., & Ts'o, D. Y. (1999). Dependence of V2 disparity processing on stimulus axis and V1 monocular inputs in the macaque monkey. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 25, 2060.
5. Cogan, A. I., Lomakin, A. J., & Rossi, A. F. (1993). Depth in anticorrelated stereograms. Vision Research, 33, 1959-1975.
6. Cogan, A. I., Kontsevich, L. L., Lomakin, A. J., Halpern, D. L., & Blake, R. (1995). Binocular disparity processing with opposite-contrast stimuli. Perception, 24, 33-47.
7. Cumming, B. G., & Parker, A. J. (1997). Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature, 389, 280-283.
8. DeAngelis, G. C., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R. D. (1991). Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure. Nature, 352, 156-159.
9. DeAngelis, D. C., Cumming, B. G., & Newsome, W. T. (1998). Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth. Nature, 394, 677-680.
10. Dodwell, P. D. (1975). Contemporary theoretical problems in seeing. In E. C. Carterette, & M. P. Friedman, Handbook of perception. Seeing, vol. V (pp. 67-75). New York: Academic Press.
11. Fielder, A. R., & Moseley, M. J. (1996). Does stereopsis matter in humans? Eye, 10, 233-238.
12. Fleet, D. J., Wagner, H., & Heeger, D. J. (1996). Neural encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position shifts and phase shifts. Vision Research, 36, 1839-1857.
13. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
14. Gillam, B. (1995). Matching needed for stereopsis. Nature, 373, 202-203.
15. Gillam, B., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Quantitative depth for a phantom surface can be based on cyclopean occlusion cues alone. Vision Research, 39, 109-112.
16. Gillam, B., Blackburn, S., & Cook, M. (1995). Panum's limiting case: double fusion, convergence error, or 'da Vinci stereopsis'. Perception, 24, 333-346.
17. Helmholtz, H. von (1909). Physiological optics. New York: Dover (J. P. C. Southall (1962),
18. Trans, from Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik (3rd ed.). Hamburg: Voss).
19. Howard, I. P. (1995). Depth from binocular rivalry without spatial disparity. Perception, 24, 67-74.
20. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis (pp. 518-523). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1970). Stereoscopic vision in macaque monkey. Cells sensitive to binocular depth in area 18 of the macaque monkey cortex. Nature, 225, 41-42.
22. Julesz, B. (1964). Binocular depth perception without familiarity cues. Science, 145, 356-362.
23. Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Kaufman, L., & Pitblado, C. B. (1969). Stereopsis with opposite contrast contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 10-12.
25. Levy, M. M., & Lawson, R. B. (1978). Stereopsis and binocular rivalry from dichoptic stereograms. Vision Research, 18, 239-246.
26. Liu, L., Stevenson, S. B., & Schor, C. W. (1994). Quantitative stereoscopic depth without binocular correspondence. Nature, 367, 66-68.
27. Liu, L., Stevenson, S. B., & Schor, C. W. (1997). Binocular matching of dissimilar features in phantom Stereopsis. Vision Research, 37, 633-644.
28. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
29. McKee, S. P., Levi, D. M., & Bowne, S. F. (1990). The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Research, 30, 1763-1779.
30. McKee, S. P., Bravo, M. J., Smallman, H. S., & Legge, G. E. (1995). The 'uniqueness constraint' and binocular masking. Perception, 24, 49-65.
31. Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (1990a). da Vinci stereopsis: depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Research, 30, 1811-1825.
32. Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (1990b). Toward a neural understanding of visual surface representation. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 55, 911-924.
33. Nakayama, K, & Shimojo, S. (1992). Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science, 257, 1357-1363.
34. Ogle, K. N. (1953). Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 43, 906-913.
35. Ohzawa, I. (1998). Mechanisms of stereoscopic vision: the disparity energy model. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 509-515.
36. Ohzawa, I., DeAngelis, G. C., & Freeman, R. D. (1990). Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science, 249, 1037-1041.
37. O'Shea, R. P., & Blake, R. (1987). Depth without disparity in random-dot stereograms. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 205-214.
38. Panum, P. L. (1858). Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen. Keil: Schwers.
39. Poggio, G. F. (1990). Cortical neural mechanisms of stereopsis studied with dynamic random-dot stereograms. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 55, 749-758.
40. Poggio, G. F., & Poggio, T. (1984). The analysis of stereopsis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 7, 379-412.
41. Qian, N. (1994). Computing stereo disparity and motion with known binocular cell properties. Neural Computation, 6, 390-404.
42. Qian, N. (1997). Binocular disparity and the perception of depth. Neuron, 18, 359-368.
43. Qian, N., & Zhu, Y. (1997). Physiological computation of binocular disparity. Vision Research, 37, 1811-1827.
44. Qian, N., & Mikaelian, S. (2000). Relationship between phase and energy methods for disparity computation. Neural Computation, 12, 279-292.
45. Smallman, H. S., & Mckee, S. P. (1995). A contrast ratio constraint on stereo matching. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 260, 265-271.
46. Shimojo, S., & Nakayama, K. (1990). Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 30, 69-80.
47. Treisman, A. M. (1962). Binocular rivalry and stereoscopic depth perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 23-37.
48. Tsai, J., & Victor, J. D. (1999). The precision of depth from unpaired image points, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 40 (Suppl.), 802 (Abstract).
49. Weinshall, D., & Malik, J. (1995). Review of computational models of stereopsis. In T. V. Papathomas, C. Chubb, A. Gorea, & E. Kowler, Early vision and beyond (pp. 33-42). Cambridge: MIT Press.
50. Wheatstone, C. (1838). Contributions to the physiology of vision. I. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 2, 371-393.