A probabilistic model for information and sensor validation

Computer Journal

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 113-126

  Ibargüengoytia, Pablo H ^a   Vadera, Sunil ^b   Sucar, L Enrique ^c  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES ELÉCTRICAS   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; REDUNDANCY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; INFORMATION VALIDATION; SENSOR VALIDATION;

FAULT TOLERANT COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 30444447404     PISSN: 00104620     EISSN: 14602067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/bxh142     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Agogino, A., Srinivas, S. and Schneider, K. (1988) Multiple sensor expert system for diagnostic reasoning, monitoring and control of mechanical systems. Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 2, 165-185.
2. Milne, R. and Nicol, C. (1996) TIGER: Knowledge based gas turbine condition monitoring. AI Commun., 9, 92-108.
3. Andreassen, S. (1992) Planning of therapy and tests in causal probabilistic networks. Artif. Intell. Med., 4, 227-242.
4. Berzuini, C., Bellazzi, R., Quaglini, S. and Spiegelhalter, D. (1992) Bayesian networks for patient monitoring. Artif. Intell. Med., 4, 243-260.
5. Abramson, B. (1994) The design of belief network-based systems for price forecasting. Comput. Elect. Eng., 20, 163-180.
6. Fiorino, F. (2001) A330 overwater flameout raises etops issues. Aviat. Week Space Technol. Available at http://www.aviationnow.com/content/ publication/awst/20010903/airbus.htm 155(10), 34-35.
7. Stankovic, J. (1988) Misconceptions about real time computing: A serious problem for next generation systems. Computer, 21, 10-19.
8. Yung, S. and Clarke, D. (1989) Local sensor validation. Meas. Control, 22, 132-141.
9. Frank, P. (1990) Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge based redundancy-a survey and some new results. Automatica, 26, 459-470.
10. Weidl, G., Madsen, A. and Dahlquist, E. (2003) Applications of object-oriented Bayesian networks for causal analysis of process disturbances. In Proc. 44th Scandinavian Conf. Simulation and Modeling, Västeras, Sweden, September 17-19, pp. 41-49. Malardalen University Press, Sweden.
11. Alag, S., Agogino, A. and Morjaria, M. (2001) A methodology for intelligent sensor measurement, validation, fusion, and fault detection for equipment monitoring and diagnostics. AIEDAM, 15, 307-319.
12. Eryurek, E. and Upadhyaya, B. (1990) Sensor validation for power plants using adaptive backpropagation neural networks. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 37, 1040-1047.
13. Guo, T. and Nurr, J. (1991) Sensor failure detection and recovery by neural networks. In Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, Seattle, WA, July 10-16, pp. 221-226. IEEE Publications, Piscataway, USA.
14. Khadem, M., Alexandro, F. and Colley, R. (1993) Sensor validation in power plants using neural networks. In Sobajic, D. (ed.), Neural Network Computing for the Electric Power Industry, pp. 51-54. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
15. Napolitano, M. R., Windon, D., Casanova, J., Innocenti, M. and Silvestri, G. (1998) Kalman filters and neural-network schemes for sensor validation in flight control systems. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., 6, 596-611.
16. Napolitano, M. R. and Silvestri, G. (1998) Sensor validation using hardware-based on-line learning neural networks. IEEE Trans. Aero. Elec. Syst., 32, 456-468.
17. Kohonen, T. (1995) Self-Organising Maps. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
18. Böhme, T., Cox, C., Valentin, N. and Denoeux, T. (1991) Comparison of autoassociative neural networks and Kohonen maps for signal failure detection and reconstruction. In Daghil, C. et al. (eds), Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks 9, pp. 637-644. ASME Press, New York.
19. Valentin, N. and Denoeux, T. (2001) A neural network-based software for coagulation control in awater treatment plant. Intell. Data Anal., 5, 23-29.
20. Holbert, K. E., Heger, A. S. and Alang-Rashid, N. K. (1994) Redundant sensor validation by using fuzzy logic. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 118, 54-64.
21. Goebel, K. and Agogino, A. (1996) An architecture for fuzzy sensor validation and fusion for vehicle following in automated highways. In Proc. 29th Int. Symp. Automotive Technology and Automation (ISATA), Florence, Italy, June 3-6, pp. 203-209. Automotive Automation Ltd, Croydon, UK.
22. Aradhye, H. and Heger, A. (2002) Signal validation using Bayesian belief networks and fuzzy logic. In Ross, T., Booker, J. and Parkinson, W. J. (eds), Fuzzy Logic and Probability Applications: Bridging the Gap, pp. 365-392. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
23. Na, M., Sim, Y., Park, K., Lee, S., Jung, D., Shin, S. H., Upadhyaya, B., Zhao, K. and Lu, B. (2003) Sensor monitoring using a fuzzy neural network with an automatic structure constructor. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 50.
24. Yen, G. and Feng, W. (2001) Winner take all experts network for sensor validation. ISA Trans., 40, 99-110.
25. Pearl, J. (1988) Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
26. Chow, C. and Liu, C. (1968) Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theor., 14, 462-467.
27. Chickering, D. (2002) Optimal structure identification with greedy search. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 507-554.
28. Geiger, D. and Pearl, J. (1988) On the logic of causal models. In Shachter, R., Levitt, T., Kanal, L. and Lemmer, J. (eds) Proc. Fourth Conf. Uncertainty in AI, St Paul, MN, July 10-12, pp. 136-147. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., New York, NY.
29. Pearl, J., Geiger, D. and Verma, T. (1990) Conditional independence and its representation. In Shafer, G. and Pearl, J. (eds), Readings in Uncertain Reasoning, pp. 55-60. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
30. Neapolitan, R. (2004) Learning Bayesian Networks. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
31. van Engelen, R. A. (1997) Approximating Bayesian belief networks by arc removal. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 19, 916-920.
32. Dean, T. and Boddy, M. (1988) An analysis of time dependent planning. In Proc. Seventh National Conf. AI, St Paul, Menlo Park, August 21-26, pp. 49-54. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.
33. Horvitz, E. (1987) Reasoning about beliefs and actions under computational resource constraints. In Lemmer, J., Levitt, T. and Kanal, L. (eds), Proc. Third Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Seatle, WA, July 10-12, pp. 429-444. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., New York, NY.
34. Boddy, M. and Dean, T. (1994) Decision theoretic deliberation schedulling for problem solving in time-constrained environments. Artif. Intell., 67, 245-286.
35. Ibargüengoytia, P., Sucar, L. and Vadera, S. (1998) Any time probabilistic reasoning for sensor validation. In Cooper, G. and Moral, S. (eds) Proc. Fourteenth Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI, July 24-26, pp. 266-273. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
36. Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois press, Urbana, IL.
37. Milne, R. (2003) Minutes of the Monet Task Group Meeting. Available at http://monet.aber.ac.uk:8080/monet/monetinfo/bridge_mins.htm.
38. MONET: (2005) European Network of Excellence. Available at http://monet. aber.ac.uk:8080/monet/index.html.
39. Weidl, G., Madsen, A. and Israelsson, S. (2005) Object-Oriented Bayesian Networks for Condition Monitoring, Root Cause Analysis and Decision Support on Operation of Complex Continuous Processes: Methodology & Applications. Technical Report 2005-1, University of Stuttgart. Available at http://www.ist.uni-stuttgart.de/reports/pdf/2005-1.pdf.
40. Sucar, L., Pérez-Brito, J., Ruiz-Suarez, J. and Morales, E. (1997) Learning structure from data and its application to ozone prediction. Appl. Intell., 7, 327-338.
41. Cohen, P. (1995) Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Arrow, K. (1974) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. North Holland, Amsterdam.
43. Martin, A., Doddington, G., Kamm, T., Ordowski, M. and Przybocki, M. (1997) The DET curve in assessment of detection task performance. In Proc. Eurospeech '97, Rhodes, Greece, September 22-25, pp. 1895-1898. International Speech Communication Association (ISCA), Bonn, Germany.
44. Weidl, G., Madsen, A. and Dahlquist, E. (2003) Object oriented Bayesian networks for industrial process operation. In Proc. Workshop on Bayesian modelling, Uncertainty in AI, Acapulco, Mexico, August 7, pp. 19-27. Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA. Available at http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/ 705216.html.
45. Friedman, N., Geiger, D. and Goldszmidt, M. (1997) Bayesian network classifiers. Mach. Learn., 29, 131-163.
46. Gallagher, R. (1968) Information Theory and Reliable Communication. Wiley, New York.
47. Cooper, G. (1990) The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian networks. Artif. Intell., 42, 393-405.
48. Suermondt, H. and Cooper, G. (1991) A combination of exact algorithms for inference on Bayesian belief networks. Int. J. Approx. Reason., 5, 521-542.
49. Chavira, M., Allen, D. and Darwiche, A. (2005) Exploiting evidence in probabilistic inference. In Proc. 21st Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 26-29, pp. 112-119. Morgan Kauffman, San Francisco, CA.
50. Kozlov, A. (1996) Parallel implementations of probabilistic inference. Computer, 29, 33-40.
51. Pennock, D. (1998) Logrithmic time parallel Bayesian inference. In Cooper, G. and Moral, S. (eds) Proc. Fourteenth Annual Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI, July 24-26, pp. 431-438. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
52. Gyftodimos, E. and Flach, P. (2004) Hierarchical Bayesian networks: An approach to classification and learning for structured data. In Vouros, G. and Panayiotopoulos, T. (eds) Proc. Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Third Hellenic Conf. on AI, Samos, Greece, May 5-8, pp. 291-300. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
53. Barigozzi, A., Magni, L. and Scattolini, R. (2004) Aprobabilistic approach to fault diagnosis of industrial systems. IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., 12, 950-955.
54. Arroyo-Figueroa, G. and Sucar, L. (1999) A temporal Bayesian network for diagnosis and prediction. In Laskey,K. and Prade, H. (eds) Proc. Fifteenth Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden, July 30-1 August, pp. 13-20. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
55. Nicholson, A. and Brady, J. (1994) Dynamic belief networks for discrete monitoring. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybernetics, 24, 1593-1610.