Reform ideals and teachers' practical intentions

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 12, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Kennedy, Mary M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042653377     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v12n13.2004     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Aguirre, J., & Speer, N. M. (1999). Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. Journal of mathematical behavior, 18(3), 327-356.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, D. C.: Author.
3. Applebee, A. N. (1991). Informal reasoning and writing instruction. In J. F. Voss & D. N. Perkins & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 225-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Argyris, C. and D. A. Schön (1996). Organizational Learning II. New York: Addison Wesley.
5. Artiles, A. J., Mostert, M. P., & Tankersley, M. (1994). Assessing the links between teacher cognitions, teacher behaviors, and pupil responses to lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 465-481.
6. Berlak, A., & Berlak, H. (1981). Dilemmas of schooling: Teaching and social change. London: Methuen.
7. Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53-62.
8. Brophy, J. (1989). Conclusion. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 345-355). Greenwich, CN: JAI Press.
9. Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Bussis, A., Chittenden, E., & Amarel, M. (1976). Beyond Surface Curriculum. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
11. Chall, J. S. (2000). The academic achievement challenge: What really works in the classroom? New York: The Guildford Press.
12. Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311-329.
13. Cuban, L. (1984). How Teachers Taught: Constancy and change in American Classrooms, 1890 - 1980. White Plains, NY: Longman.
14. Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3-13.
15. Cremin, L. (1990). Popular education and its discontents. New York: Harper and Row.
16. Cronbach, L. J., & Suppes, P. (Eds.). (1969). Research for tomorrow's schools: Disciplined Inquiry for education. New York: National Academy of Education and Macmilan.
17. Doyle, W. (1986). Content representation in teachers' definitions of academic work. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(4), 365-379.
18. Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind: How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Egan, K. (2001). Why education is so difficult and contentious. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 923-941.
20. Fenwick, D. T. (1998). Managing space, energy, and self: Junior high teachers' experiences of classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(6), 619-631.
21. Gall, M. D. (1970). The use of questioning in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 40, 707-721.
22. Gallagher, M. C. (2001). Lessons from the Sputnik-era curriculum reform movement: The Institutions we need for educational reform. In S. Stotsky (Ed.), What's at stake in the K-12 standards wars (pp. 281-312). New York: Peter Lang.
23. Gold, B. A. (1999). Punctuated legitimacy: A theory of educational change. Teachers College Record, 101(2): 192-219.
24. Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 485-529.
25. Hoetker, J. and W. P. Ahlbrand Jr. (1969). The persistence of the recitation. American Educational Research Journal 6: 145-167.
26. Hunt, T. C. (2003) The Impossible Dream: Education and the search for panaceas. New York: Peter Lang
27. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1986). Choices, values and frames. In H. R. Arkes & K. R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 194-210). New York: Cambridge University press.
28. Kennedy, M. M. (2002). Knowledge and Teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 355-370/
29. Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The Project Method. Teachers College Record.
30. Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on the problems of practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55, 178-194.
31. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Labaree, D. F. (2000). On the nature of teaching and teacher education: Difficult practices that look easy. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 228-233.
33. Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (1998). Science teachers' beliefs and intentions regarding the use of cooperative learning. School Science and Mathematics, 98(3), 123-135.
34. McNeil, L. M. (1985). Contradictions of Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Education.
36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
37. Oliver, W. A. (1953). Teachers' educational beliefs versus their classroom practices. Journal of Educational Research, 48(1), 47-55.
38. Pearson, J. (1985). Are teachers' beliefs incongruent with their observed classroom behavior? The Urban Review, 17(2), 128-146.
39. Porter, A. C., Floden, R. E., Freeman, D. J., Schmidt, W. H., & Schwille, J. R. (1989). Content Determinants in elementary school mathematics, Effective mathematics teaching (pp. 96-113).
40. Pressley, M., Rankin, J., & Yokoi, L. (1996). A survey of instructional practices of primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Elementary School Journal, 96(4), 363-384.
41. Richardson, V. A. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula & T. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan.
42. Ravitch, D. (2000). Left Back: A century of battles over school reform. New York: Touchstone.
43. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U. S. Science and Mathematics Education. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University TIMSS.
44. Schoenfeld, A. (1999a). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Berkeley CA: University of California at Berkeley.
45. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999b). Models of the Teaching Process. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 243-261.
46. Schwab, J. J. (1978). The "impossible" role of the teacher in progressive education. In I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkoff (Eds.), Science, curriculum and liberal education: Selected essays (pp. 167-183). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
48. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. van den Berg, B. (2002). Teachers' meanings regarding educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 72(4), 577-625.
50. Wagner, A. C. (1987). "Knots" in teachers' thinking. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teacher thinking (pp. 161-178). London: Cassell.
51. Waller, W. (1932/1961). The sociology of teaching. New York: Russell and Russell.