Genomic regionality in rates of evolution is not explained by clustering of genes of comparable expression profile

Genome Research

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1002-1013

  Lecher, Martin J ^a   Chamary, Jean Vincent ^a   Hurst, Laurence D ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ASSAY; CHROMOSOME SUBSTITUTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GENE CLUSTER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTRON; MAMMAL; MEIOSIS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID BASE SUBSTITUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GC RICH SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENES; GENOME; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; RATS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; VARIATION (GENETICS);

MAMMALIA;

EID: 3042616134     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.1597404     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aguilera, A. 2002. The connection between transcription and genomic instability. EMBO J. 21: 195-201.
2. Arndt, P.F., Petrov, D.A., and Hwa, T. 2003. Distinct changes of genomic biases in nucleotide substitution at the time of mammalian radiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 1887-1896.
3. Averof, M., Rokas, A., Wolfe, K.H., and Sharp, P.M. 2000. Evidence for a high frequency of simultaneous double-nucleotide substitutions. Science 287: 1283-1286.
4. Bielawski, J.P., Dunn, K.A., and Yang, Z. 2000. Rates of nucleotide substitution and mammalian nuclear gene evolution: Approximate and maximum-likelihood methods lead to different conclusions. Genetics 156: 1299-1308.
5. Bierne, N. and Eyre-Walker, A. 2003. The problem of counting sites in the estimation of the synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates. Implications for the correlation between the synonymous substitution rate and codon usage bias. Genetics 165: 1587-1597.
6. Caron, H., van Schaik, B., van der Mee, M., Baas, F., Riggins, G., van Sluis, P., Hermus, M.C., van Asperen, R., Boon, K., Voute, P.A., et al. 2001. The human transcriptome map: Clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains. Science 291: 1289-1292.
7. Casane, D., Boissinot, S., Chang, B.H.J., Shimmin, L.C., and Li, W.H. 1997. Mutation pattern variation among regions of the primate genome. J. Mol. Evol. 45: 216-226.
8. Castresana, J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 540-552.
9. Castresana, J. 2002a. Estimation of genetic distances from human and mouse intfons. Genome Biol. 3: RESEARCH0028.
10. Castresana, J. 2002b. Genes on human chromosome 19 show extreme divergence from the mouse orthologs and a high GC content. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 1751-1756.
11. Chamary, J.V. and Hurst, L.D. 2004. Similar rates but different modes of sequence evolution in introns and at exonic silent sites in rodents: Evidence for selectively driven codon usage. Mol. Biol. Evol. (in press).
12. Datta, A. and Jinks-Robertson, S. 1995. Association of increased spontaneous mutation-rates with high-levels of transcription in yeast. Science 268: 1616-1619.
13. Duret, L. and Mouchiroud, D. 2000. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: Expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 68-74.
14. Duret, L., Semon, M., Piganeau, G., Mouchiroud, D., and Galtier, N. 2002. Vanishing GC-rich isochores in mammalian genomes. Genetics 162: 1837-1847.
15. Ebersberger, I., Metzler, D., Schwarz, C., and Paabo, S. 2002. Genomewide comparison of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70: 1490-1497.
16. Eyre-Walker, A. 1993. Recombination and mammalian genome evolution. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 252: 237-243.
17. Eyre-Walker, A. 1999. Evidence of selection on silent site base composition in mammals: Potential implications for the evolution of isochores and junk DNA. Genetics 152: 675-683.
18. Filatov, D.A. 2003. A gradient of silent substitution rate in the human pseudoautosomal region. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 410-417.
19. Filatov, D.A. and Gerrard, D.T. 2003. High mutation rates in human and ape pseudoautosomal genes. Gene 317: 67-77.
20. Fullerton, S.M., Bernardo Carvalho, A., and Clark, A.G. 2001. Local rates of recombination are positively correlated with GC content in the human genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1139-1142.
21. Green, P., Ewing, B., Miller, W., Thomas, P.J., Nc, N., and Green, E.D. 2003. Transcription-associated mutational asymmetry in mammalian evolution. Nat. Genet. 33: 514-517.
22. Hardison, R.C., Roskin, K.M., Yang, S., Diekhans, M., Kent, W.J., Weber, R., Elnitski, L., Li, J., O'Connor, M., Kolbe, D., et al. 2003. Covariation in frequencies of substitution, deletion, transposition, and recombination during eutherian evolution. Genome Res. 13: 13-26.
23. Hastings, K.E.M. 1996. Strong evolutionary conservation of broadly expressed protein isoforms in the troponin I gene family and other vertebrate gene families. J. Mol. Evol. 42: 631-640.
24. Hellmann, I., Ebersberger, I., Ptak, S.E., Paabo, S., and Przeworski, M. 2003. A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72: 1527-1535.
25. Hubbard, T., Barker, D., Birney, E., Cameron, G., Chen, Y., Clark, L., Cox, T., Cuff, J., Curwen, V., Down, T., et al. 2002. The Ensembl genome database project. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 38-41.
26. Hughes, A.L. and Yeager, M. 1997. Comparative evolutionary rates of introns and exons in murine rodents. J. Mol. Evol. 45: 125-130.
27. Huminiecki, L., Lloyd, A.T., and Wolfe, K.H. 2003. Congruence of tissue expression profiles from Gene Expression Atlas, SAGEmap and TissueInfo databases. BMC Genomics 4: 31.
28. Hurst, L.D. and Eyre-Walker, A. 2000. Evolutionary genomics: Reading the bands. Bioessays 22: 105-107.
29. Hurst, L.D. and Williams, E.J.B. 2000. Covariation of GC content and the silent site substitution rate in rodents: Implications for methodology and for the evolution of isochores. Gene 261: 107-114.
30. Kondrashov, A.S. 2003. Direct estimates of human per nucleotide mutation rates at 20 loci causing Mendelian diseases. Hum. Mut. 21: 12-27.
31. Kong, A., Gudbjartsson, D.F., Sainz, J., Jonsdottir, G.M., Gudjonsson, S.A., Richardsson, B., Sigurdardottir, S., Barnard, J., Hallbeck, B., Masson, G., et al. 2002. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat. Genet. 31: 241-247.
32. Kumar, S. and Gadagkar, S.R. 2001. Disparity index: A simple statistic to measure and test the homogeneity of substitution patterns between molecular sequences. Genetics 158: 1321-1327.
33. Kumar, S. and Subramanian, S. 2002. Mutation rates in mammalian genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 803-808.
34. Lash, A.E., Tolstoshev, C.M., Wagner, L., Schuler, G.D., Strausberg, R.L., Riggins, G.J., and Altschul, S.F. 2000. SAGEmap: A public gene expression resource. Genome Res. 10: 1051-1060.
35. Lercher, M.J. and Hurst, L.D. 2002a. Can mutation or fixation biases explain the allele frequency distribution of human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)? Gene 300: 53-58.
36. Lercher, M.J. and Hurst, L.D. 2002b. Human SNP variability and mutation rate are higher in regions of high recombination. Trends Genet. 18: 337-340.
37. Lercher, M.J., Williams, E.J.B., and Hurst, L.D. 2001. Local similarity in evolutionary rates extends over whole chromosomes in human-rodent and mouse-rat comparisons: Implications for understanding the mechanistic basis of the male mutation bias. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 2032-2039.
38. Lercher, M.J., Smith, N.G., Eyre-Walker, A., and Hurst, L.D. 2002a. The evolution of isochores: Evidence from SNP frequency distributions. Genetics 162: 1805-1810.
39. Lercher, M.J., Urrutia, A.O., and Hurst, L.D. 2002b. Clustering of housekeeping genes provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 31: 180-183.
40. Lercher, M,J., Urrutia, A.O., Pavlicek, A., and Hurst, L.D. 2003. A unification of mosaic structures in the human genome. Hum. Mol. Genet 12: 2411-2415.
41. Li, W.-H. 1993. Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonynmous substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36: 96-99.
42. Li, W.-H. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
43. Majewski, J. and Ott, J. 2002. Distribution and characterization of regulatory elements in the human genome. Genome Res. 12: 1827-1836.
44. Malcom, C.M., Wyckoff, G.J., and Lahn, B.T. 2003. Genic mutation rates in mammals: Local similarity, chromosomal heterogeneity, and X-versus-autosome disparity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 1633-1641.
45. Margulies, E.H., Kardia, S.L., and Innis, J.W. 2001. Identification and prevention of a GC content bias in SAGE libraries. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: e60.
46. Matassi, G., Sharp, P.M., and Gautier, C. 1999. Chromosomal location effects on gene sequence evolution in mammals. Curr. Biol. 9: 786-791.
47. Mellon, I., Spivak, G., and Hanawalt, P.C. 1987. Selective removal of transcription-blocking DNA damage from the transcribed strand of the mammalian Dhfr gene. Cell 51: 241-249.
48. Meunier, J. and Duret, L. 2004. Recombination drives the evolution of GC-content in the human genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. (in press).
49. Nachman, M.W. and Crowell, S.L. 2000. Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. Genetics 156: 297-304.
50. Nekrutenko, A. and Li, W.H. 2000. Assessment of compositional heterogeneity within and between eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 10: 1986-1995.
51. Ogata, H., Fujibuchi, W., and Kanehisa, M. 1996. The size differences among mammalian introns are due to the accumulation of small deletions. FEBS Lett. 390: 99-103.
52. Perry, J. and Ashworth, A. 1999. Evolutionary rate of a gene affected by chromosomal position. Curr. Biol. 9: 987-989.
53. Schuler, G.D., Boguski, M.S., Stewart, E.A., Stein, L.D., Gyapay, G., Rice, K., White, R.E., Rodriguez-Tome, P., Aggarwal, A., Bajorek, E., et al. 1996. A gene map of the human genome. Science 274: 540-546.
54. Selby, C.P. and Sancar, A. 1993. Transcription-repair coupling and mutation frequency decline. J. Bacteriol. 175: 7509-7514.
55. Silva, J.C. and Kondrashov, A.S. 2002. Patterns in spontaneous mutation revealed by human-baboon sequence comparison. Trends Genet. 18: 544-547.
56. Smith, N.G.C. and Eyre-Walker, A. 2001. Synonymous codon bias is not caused by mutation bias in G+C- rich genes in humans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 982-986.
57. Smith, N.G.C. and Hurst, L.D. 1998. Sensitivity of patterns of molecular evolution to alterations in methodology: A critique of Hughes and Yeager. J. Mol. Evol. 47: 493-500.
58. Smith, N.G.C. and Hurst, L.D. 1999. The effect of tandem substitutions on the correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous rates in rodents. Genetics 153: 1395-1402.
59. Smith, N.G. and Lercher, M.J. 2002. Regional similarities in polymorphism in the human genome extend over many megabases. Trends Genet. 18: 281-283.
60. Smith, N.G.C., Webster, M.T., and Ellegren, H. 2002. Deterministic mutation rate variation in the human genome. Genome Res. 12: 1350-1356.
61. Smith, N.G.C., Webster, M.T., and Ellegren, H. 2003. A low rate of simultaneous double-nucleotide mutations in primates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 47-53.
62. Su, A.I., Cooke, M.P., Ching, K.A., Hakak, Y., Walker, J.R., Wiltshire, T., Orth, A.P., Vega, R.G., Sapinoso, L.M., Moqrich, A., et al. 2002. Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 4465-4470.
63. Svejstrup, J.Q. 2002. Mechanisms of transcription-coupled DNA repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3: 21-29.
64. Tamura, K. and Kumar, S. 2002. Evolutionary distance estimation under heterogeneous substitution pattern among lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 1727-1736.
65. Tamura, K. and Nei, M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial-DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 512-526.
66. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. Clustalw - Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
67. Urrutia, A.O. and Hurst, L.D. 2003. The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes. Genome Res. 13: 2260-2264.
68. van Gool, A.J., van der Horst, G., Citterio, E., and Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. 1997. Cockayne syndrome: Defective repair of transcription? EMBO J. 16: 4155-4162.
69. Velculescu, V.E., Zhang, L., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzier, K.W. 1995. Serial analysis of gene expression. Science 270: 484-487.
70. Versteeg, R., van Schaik, B.D.C., van Batenburg, M.F., Roos, M., Monajemi, R., Caron, H., Bussemaker, H.J., and van Kampen, A.H.C. 2003. The human transcriptome map reveals extremes in gene density, intron length, GC content, and repeat pattern for domains of highly and weakly expressed genes. Genome Res. 13: 1998-2004.
71. Williams, E.J.B. and Hurst, L.D. 2000. The proteins of linked genes evolve at similar rates. Nature 407: 900-903.
72. Williams, E.J.B. and Hurst, L.D. 2002. Clustering of tissue-specific genes underlies much of the similarity in rates of protein evolution of linked genes. J. Mol. Evol. 54: 511-518.
73. Yi, S.J., Ellsworth, D.L., and Li, W.H. 2002. Slow molecular clocks in Old World monkeys, apes, and humans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 2191-2198.