Gene expression analysis of the hepatotoxicant methapyrilene in primary rat hepatocytes: An interlaboratory study

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 92-99

  Beekmann, Johanna M ^a   Boess, Franziska ^b   Hildebrand, Heinrich ^a   Kalkuhl, Arno ^c   Suter, Laura ^b  

^a BAYER PHARMA AG   (Germany)

^b F HOFFMANN LA ROCHE LTD   (Switzerland)

^c BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH AND CO KG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hepatotoxicity; Interlaboratory study; Methapyrilene; Microarray; Rat hepatocytes; Toxicogenomics

Indexed keywords

METHAPYRILENE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DRUG EXPOSURE; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG MEGADOSE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENOMICS; IN VITRO STUDY; INCUBATION TIME; LABORATORY TEST; LIVER CELL; LIVER CELL CULTURE; LIVER TOXICITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOXICOGENETICS; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HEPATOCYTES; LABORATORIES; MALE; METHAPYRILENE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; RATS; RATS, INBRED STRAINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOXICOGENETICS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 30344446981     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: 15529924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7915     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baker VA, Harries HM, Waring JF, Duggan CM, Ni HA, Jolly RA, et al. 2004. Clofibrate-induced gene expression changes in rat liver: a cross laboratory analysis using membrane cDNA arrays. Environ Health Perspect 112:428-438.
2. Boess F, Kamber M, Romer S, Gasser R, Muller D, Albertini S, et al. 2003. Gene expression in two hepatic cell lines, cultured primary hepatocytes, and liver slices compared to the in vivo liver gene expression in rats: possible implications for toxicogenomics use of in vitrosystems. Toxicol Sci 73:386-402.
3. Chu T-M, Deng S, Wolfinger R, Paules RS, Hamadeh HK. 2004. Cross-site comparison of gene expression data reveals high similarity. Environ Health Perspect 112:449-455.
4. Gómez-Lechón MJ, Montova A, López P, Donato T, Larrauri A, Castell JV. 1988. The potential use of cultured hepatocytes in predicting the hepatotoxicity of xenobiotics. Xenobiotica 18:725-735.
5. Hamadeh HK, Knight BL, Haugen AC, Sieber S, Amin RP, Bushel PR, et al. 2002. Methapyrilene toxicity: anchorage of pathologic observations to gene expression alterations. Toxicol Pathol 30:470-482.
6. Harries HM, Fletcher ST, Duggan CM, Baker VA. 2001. The use of genomics technology to investigate gene expression changes in cultured human liver cells. Toxicol In Vitro 15:399-405.
7. Hollander MC, Poola-Kella S, Fornace AJ. 2003. Gadd 34 functional domains involved in growth suppression and apoptosis. Oncogene 22:3827-3832.
8. Kilbey BJ, Legator M, Nicholson W, Ramel C. 1984. Handbook of Mutagenicity Test Procedures. 2nd ed. Amsterdam:Elsevier.
9. Lee ML, Kuo FC, Whitmore GA, Sklar J. 2000. Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:9834-9839.
10. Lijinski W, Reuber MD, Blackwell BN. 1980. Liver tumors induced in rats by oral administration of the antihistaminic methapyrilene hydrochloride. Science 209:817-819.
11. Lockhart DJ, Dong H, Byrne MC, Follettie MT, Gallo MV, Chee MS. 1996. Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat Biotechnol 14:1675-1680.
12. Mirsalis JC. 1987. Genotoxicity, toxicity, and carcinogenicity of the antihistamine methapyrilene. Mutat Res 185:309-317.
13. Noguchi S, Inukai T, Kuno T, Tanaka C. 1992. The suppression of olfactory bulbectomy-induced muricide by antidepressants and antihistamines via histamine H1 receptor blocking. Physiol Behav 51:1123-1127.
14. Paillard F, Finot F, Mouche I, Prenez A, Vericat JA. 1999. Use of primary cultures of rat hepatocytes to predict toxicity in the early development of new chemical entities. Toxicol In Vitro 13:693-700.
15. Pennie W, Pettit SD, Lord PG. 2004. Toxicogenomics in risk assessment: an overview of an HESI collaborative research program. Environ Health Perspect 112:417-419.
16. 2+ channel blocker verapamil. Toxicology 130:79-93.
17. Ratra GS, Powell CJ, Park BK, Maggs JL, Cottrell S. 2000. Methapyrilene hepatotoxicity is associated with increased hepatic glutathione, the formation of glucuronide conjugates, and enterohepatic recirculation. Chem Biol Interact 129:279-295.
18. Reznik-Schuller HM, Lijinski W. 1981. Morphology of early changes in liver carcinogenesis induced by methapyrilene. Arch Toxicol 49:79-83.
19. Robinson D, Pettit S, Morgan DG. 2003. Use of genomics in mechanism based risk assessment. In: Toxicogenomics (Inoue T, Pennie WD, eds). Tokyo:Springer-Verlag, 194-203.
20. Seglen PO. 1972. Preparation of rat liver cells. Exp Cell Res 74:450-454.
21. Steinmetz KL, Tyson CK, Meierhenry EF, Splading JW, Mirsalis JC. 1988. Examination of genotoxicity, toxicity and morphologic alterations in hepatocytes following in vivo or in vitro exposure to methapyrilene. Carcinogenesis 9:959-963.
22. Ulrich RG, Rockett JC, Gibson GG, Pettit SD. 2004. Overview of an interlaboratory collaboration on evaluating the effects of model hepatotoxicants on hepatic gene expression. Environ Health Perspect 112:423-427.
23. Waring JF, Ciurlionis R, Jolly RA, Heindel M, Ulrich RG. 2001. Microarray analysis of hepatotoxins in vitroreveals a correlation between gene expression profiles and mechanisms of toxicity. Toxicol Lett 120:359-368.
24. Waring JF, Ulrich RG, Flint N, Marfitt D, Kalkuhl A, Staedtler F, et al. 2004. Interlaboratory evaluation of rat hepatic gene expression changes induced by methapyrilene. Environ Health Perspect 112:439-448.
25. Welch BL. 1938. The significance of the difference between means when the population variances are unequal Biometrika 29:350-362.
26. Yamaguchi A, Hori O, Stren DM, Hartmann E, Ogawa S, Tohyama M. 1999. Stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 1 (SERP1)/ribosome-associated membrane protein 4 (RAMP4) stabilizes membrane proteins during stress and facilitates subsequent glycosylation. J Cell Biol 147:1195-1204.