Case report: A modified constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) program for the upper extremity of a person with chronic stroke

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 243-256

  Hakim, Renée M ^a   Kelly, Stephen J ^b   Grant Beuttler, Marybeth ^a   Healy, Brian ^c   Krempasky, Jesse ^d   Moore, Sean ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCRANTON   (United States)

^b Ivy Rehab   (United States)

^c Thomas Nicolla Physical Therapy   (United States)

^d Penn Therapy Associates Inc   (United States)

^e Sports Physical Therapy Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DECELERATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOME; HUMAN; MODIFIED CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; MOTION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHYSIOTHERAPY; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VELOCITY; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; WAKEFULNESS;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 28844492587     PISSN: 09593985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593980500321127     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Blanton S, Wolf SL 1999 An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with sub-acute stroke. Physical Therapy 79: 847-853
2. Cirstea MC, Levin MF 2000 Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123: 940-953
3. Fisk JD, Goodale MA 1988 The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit. Experimental Brain Research 72: 425-435
4. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. Management of the post stroke arm and hand. Available at http://www.hsfpe.org (accessed March 6, 2002)
5. Jeannerod M 1984 The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 16: 235-254
6. Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, Keller P, Chakeres DW 2001 Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80: 4-12
7. Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR et al 2000 Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 31: 1210-1216
8. Liepert J, Miltner WHR, Bauder H et al 1998 Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 250: 5-8
9. Liepert J, Uhde I, Graf S et al 2001 Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: A preliminary study. Journal of Neurology 248: 315-321
10. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E 1999 Effects of constraint induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke. Stroke 30: 586-592
11. Morris DM, Crago JE, DeLuca SC, Pidikiti RD, Taub E 1997 Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabilitation 9: 29-43
12. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS 1994 Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: The copenhagen stroke study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 75: 852-857
13. Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL 1981 Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. Physical Therapy 61: 1022-1028
14. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV 2002 Stroke patients' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clinical Rehabilitation 16: 55-60
15. Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, Johnston MV, Hughes M 2001 Modified constraint-induced movement therapy: A randomized feasibility and efficacy study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 38: 385-393
16. Schmidt R 1991 Motor learning principles for physical therapy. In: Lister M (ed), Contemporary management of motor control problems. Proceedings of the II step conference, Alexandria, VA, Foundation for Physical Therapy.
17. Steenbergen B, van der Kamp J 2004 Control of prehension in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: similarities and differences between the ipsi- and contra-lesional sides of the body. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 46: 325-332
18. Sugarman H, Avni A, Nathan R, Weisel-Eichler A, Tiran J 2002 Movement in the ipsilateral hand is segmented following unilateral brain damage. Brain and Cognition 48: 579-587
19. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connel JS, Crago JE 1993 Technique to improve chronic deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 74: 347-354
20. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R 1999 Constraint-Induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - A clinical review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 36: 237-251
21. Vanderlee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM 1999 Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 30: 2369-2375
22. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS 1995 Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Experimental Brain Research 105: 163-174
23. Wolf SL, Binder-MacLeod SA 1983 Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient: changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Physical Therapy 63: 1393-1403
24. Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler AJ 2002 Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. The Neurologist 8: 325-338
25. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A 2001 Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32: 1635-1639
26. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB 1989 Forced-use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Experimental Neurology 104: 125-132