PGD patients' and providers' attitudes to the use and regulation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 486-496

  Kalfoglou, Andrea L ^a   Scott, Joan ^a   Hudson, Kathy ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Ethics; PGD; Qualitative research; Regulation; Reproductive genetics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONGENITAL ADRENAL HYPERPLASIA; CYSTIC FIBROSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FABRY DISEASE; FANCONI ANEMIA; FATALITY; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC SCREENING; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEMOPHILIA; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NURSE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SAFETY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIBLING; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 28844450356     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61145-5     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adams KE 2003 Ethical considerations of applications of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the United States. Medicine and Law 22, 489-494.
2. American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee 2001 'Practice committee report: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis.'American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
3. Ao A, Ray P, Harper J et al. 1996 Clinical experience with preimplamation genetic diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (delta F508). Prenatal Diagnosis 16, 137-142.
4. Chamayou S, Guglielmino A, Giambona A et al. 1998 Attitude of potential users in Sicily towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis for beta-thalassaemia. and aneuploidies. Human Reproduction 13, 1936-1944.
5. Doyal L, McLean S 2005 Choosing children: intergenerational justice? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10 (suppl. 1), 119-124.
6. Edwards RG 2004 Ethics of PGD: thoughts on the consequences of typing HLA in embryos. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 9, 222-224.
7. Edwards RG 2003 Ethics of preimplantation diagnosis: recordings from the Fourth International Symposium on Preimplantation Genetics. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 6, 170-180.
8. ESHRE Taskforce on Ethics and Law 2005 Taskforce 9: the application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for human leukocyte antigen typing of embryos. Human Reproduction 20, 845-847.
9. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2004a Child-rearing ability and the provision of fertility services. Fertility and Sterility 82, 564-567.
10. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2004b Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertility and Sterility 82 (suppl. 1), S232-S235.
11. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 1999 Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. The Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Fertility and Sterility 72, 595-598.
12. Feldman MS 1995 Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
13. Fernandez DO, De Vincentiis S, Chillik CF, Brugo-Olmedo SP 2004 Patients' opinions regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis in a Latin American fertility clinic. Fertility and Sterility 81, 463-464.
14. Frankel MS, Morris P 2003 A view from the field on food and drug administration regulation: report of a 2002 survey of US fertility clinics. Fertility and Sterility 79, 1060-1062.
15. Galton DJ 2005 Eugenics: some lessons from the past. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10 (suppl. 1), 133-136.
16. Genetics and Public Policy Center 2004 Reproductive Genetic Testing: What America Thinks. Genetics and Public Policy Center, Washington, D.C.
17. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP et al. 2005 The beneficial effects of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10, 633-640.
18. Gurmankin AD, Caplan AL, Braverman AM 2005 Screening practices and beliefs of assisted reproductive technology programs. Fertility and Sterility 83, 61-67.
19. Hui PW, Lam YH, Chen M et al. 2002 Attitude of at-risk subjects towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis of alpha- and beta-thalassaemias in Hong Kong. Prenatal Diagnosis 22, 508-511.
20. Jain T, Missmer SA, Gupta RS, Hornstein MD 2005 Preimplantation sex selection demand and preferences in an infertility population. Fertility and Sterility 83, 649-658.
21. Kalfoglou AL, Doksum T, Bernhardt B et al. 2005 Opinions about new reproductive genetic technologies: hopes and fears for our genetic future. Fertility and Sterility 83, 1612-1621.
22. Katz MG, Fitzgerald L, Bankier A et al. 2002 Issues and concerns of couples presenting for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Prenatal Diagnosis 22, 1117-1122.
23. Keye WR Jr, Bradshaw KD 2004 A survey of the practices and opinions of the domestic members of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility and Sterility 82, 536-542.
24. Klipstein S 2005 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: technological promise and ethical perils. Fertility and Sterility 83, 1347-1353.
25. Knoppers BM, Isasi RM 2004 Regulatory approaches to reproductive genetic testing. Human Reproduction 19, 2695-2701.
26. Krones T, Richter G 2004 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD): European perspectives and the German situation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29, 623-640.
27. Krones T, Schluter E, Manolopoulos K et al. 2005 Public, expert and patients' opinions on preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in Germany. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10, 116-123.
28. Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y 2005 Place of preimplantation diagnosis in genetic practice. American Journal of Medical Genetics 134, 105-110.
29. Lavery SA, Aurell R, Turner C et al. 2002 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: patients' experiences and attitudes. Human Reproduction 17, 2464-2467.
30. McMahan J 2005 The morality of screening for disability. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10 (suppl. 1), 129-132.
31. Meister U, Finck C, Stobel-Richter Y et al. 2005 Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany. Human Reproduction 20, 231-238.
32. Miedzybrodzka Z, Templeton A, Dean J et al. 1993 Preimplantation diagnosis or chorionic villus biopsy? Women's attitudes and preferences. Human Reproduction 8, 2192-2196.
33. Ogilvie CM, Braude PR, Scriven PN 2005 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis - an overview. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 53, 255-260.
34. Palomba ML, Monni G, Lai R et al. 1994 Psychological implications and acceptability of preimplantation diagnosis. Human Reproduction 9, 360-362.
35. Pennings G, de Wert G 2003 Evolving ethics in medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction Update 9, 397-404.
36. Pennings G, Bonduelle M, Liebaers I 2003 Decisional authority and moral responsibility of patients and clinicians in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 7, 509-513.
37. Pergament E 1991 Preimplantation diagnosis: a patient perspective. Prenatal Diagnosis 11, 493-500.
38. PGDIS 2004 The Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS): guidelines for good practice in PGD. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 9, 430-434.
39. Roberts C, Franklin S 2004 Experiencing new forms of genetic choice: findings from an ethnographic study of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human Fertility 7, 285-293.
40. Robertson JA 2005 Ethics and the future of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10 (suppl. 1), 97-101.
41. Robertson JA 2003a Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses. Journal of Medical Ethics 29, 213-216.
42. Robertson JA 2003b Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the ethical debate. Ethical issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human Reproduction 18, 465-471.
43. Robertson JA 2003c View of the ASRM Ethics Committee. Human Reproduction 18, 464.
44. Seeho SK, Burton G, Leigh D et al. 2005 The role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in the management of severe rhesus alloimmunization: first unaffected pregnancy: case report. Human Reproduction 20, 697-701.
45. Seidman I 1998 Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College Press, New York.
46. Sermon K, Mouton C, Harper J et al. 2005 ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection IV: May-December 2001. Human Reproduction 20, 19-34.
47. Shenfield F, Pennings G, Devroey P2003 Taskforce 5: preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Human Reproductive 18, 649-651.
48. Simpson JL 2001 Changing indications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 183 (suppl. 1), S69-S75.
49. Snowdon C, Green JM 1997 Preimplantation diagnosis and other reproductive options: attitudes of male and female carriers of recessive disorders. Human Reproduction 12, 341-350.
50. Stern JE, Cramer CP, Green RM et al.2003 Determining access to assisted reproductive technology: reactions of clinic directors to ethically complex case scenarios. Human Reproduction 18, 1343-1352.
51. Thornhill AR, Dedie-Smulders CE, Geraedts JP et al. 2005 ESHRE PGD Consortium: Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). Human Reproduction 20, 35-48.
52. Vergeer MM, van Balen F, Ketting E 1998 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as an alternative to amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: psychosocial and ethical aspects. Patient Education and Counseling. 35, 5-13.
53. Viville S, Pergament D 1998 Results of a survey of the legal status and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis conducted in 13 different countries. Prenatal Diagnosis 18, 1374-1380.