Screening practices and beliefs of assisted reproductive technology programs

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 61-67

  Gurmankin, Andrea D ^a   Caplan, Arthur L ^b   Braverman, Andrea M ^c  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

access; IVF; screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCREENING TEST; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TECHNOLOGY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SPERMATOZOA; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 11844306025     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.048     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Frequently asked questions about infertility http://www.asrm.org/Patients/faqs.html. Accessed July 2002
2. Centers for Disease Control. ART trends: 1996-2000 http://www.cdc.gov/ nccdphp/drh/ART00/sect6_fig41-43.htm#Figure%2041. Accessed February 2003
3. Roe v Wade. Supreme Court of the U.S. 1973 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d. 147.
4. Griswold v Connecticut. 381 U.S. 479, 85 S.Ct. 1678, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965).
5. C. Gorney Articles of faith: a frontline history of the abortion wars 1998 Simon and Schuster New York
6. D.J. Kevles In the name of eugenics 1986 University of California Press Berkeley, CA
7. P.R. Reilly The surgical solution 1991 Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore
8. E. Parens, L.P. Knowles Reprogenetics and public policy Hastings Center Rep 33 2003 S1 24
9. P. Baird Individual interests, societal interests and reproductive technologies Perspect Biol Med 40 1997 440 451
10. C. Overall Ethics and human reproduction 1987 Routledge, Chapman and Hall New York
11. J.A. Robertson Regulation of assisted reproduction: the need for flexibility Hum Reprod 12 1997 7 8
12. M. Humphrey, H. Humphrey, I. Ainsworth-Smith Screening by couples for parenthood by donor insemination Soc Sci Med 32 1991 273 278
13. S.R. Leiblum, E. Williams Screening in or out of the new reproductive options: who decides and why J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 14 Spec Iss 1993 37 44
14. McClain C. Who's 'fit' to become a mother? Local doctor defends inseminating jobless, disabled woman artificially. Arizona Daily Star; February 14, 2001: A1.
15. J.A. Robertson Children of choice: freedom and the new reproductive technologies 1994 Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ
16. The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law Assisted reproductive technologies: analysis and recommendations for public policy 1998 Health Education Services Albany, NY
17. J.E. Stern, C.P. Cramer, A. Garrod, R.M. Green Access to services at assisted reproductive technology clinics: a survey of policies and practice Am J Obstet Gynecol 184 2001 591 597
18. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies http://sart.org/find.html "Find a clinic". Accessed July 2001
19. Fiscus S, Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Wilfert C, Johnson VA. Can zidovudine monotherapy continue to reduce perinatal HIV transmission: the North Carolina experience 1993-1997. Abstract 33162, presented at the XII World AIDS Conference; Geneva, Switzerland; July 29-July 3, 1998.
20. D.H. Watts Management of human immunodeficiency virus infection in pregnancy N Engl J Med 346 2002 1879 1891
21. M. Lallemant, G. Jourdain, S. Le Coeur, S. Kim, S. Koetsawang, A.M. Comeau A trial of shortened zidovudine regimens to prevent mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 N Engl J Med 343 2000 982 991
22. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Code of practice, 5th edition http://www.hfea.gov.uk/HFEAPublications/CodeofPractice. Accessed December 2003
23. R. Deech Assisted reproductive techniques and the law Medicolegal J 69 2000 13 24
24. C. Cohen Unmanaged care: the need to regulate new reproductive technologies in the United States Bioethics 1 1997 348 365