Ethics and the future of preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 10, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2005, Pages 97-101

  Robertson, John A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Deafness; Embryos; Eugenics; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Regulation; Sex selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLASTOMERE; CHILD WELFARE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC TRAIT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROGENY; REPRODUCTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

EID: 15044344281     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62214-6     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Society of Reproductive Medicine 2001 Preconception gender selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertility and Sterility 75, 861-864.
2. Ashcroft RE 2003 In vitro fertilization for all? The question is for local purchasers to answer, not for NICE. British Medical Journal 327, 511-512.
3. Davis D 2001 Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parental Choices, and Children's Futures. Routledge, New York.
4. Dennis C 2004 Deaf by design. Nature 431, 894-896.
5. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority 2003 Sex Selection: Options for Regulation. A Report on the HFEA's 2002-2003 Review of Sex Selection Including Discussion of Legislative and Regulatory Options. HFEA, London.
6. International Working Group on Preimplantation Genetics 2001 Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: experience of 3000 clinical cycles. Report of the 11th Annual Meeting of International Working Group on Preimplantation Genetics, Vienna, May 15, 2001. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 3, 49-53.
7. Kass LR 1998 The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans. Valparaiso University Law Review 1998, 679-705.
8. Kass LR 2000 Triumph or tragedy: the moral meaning of genetic technology. American Journal of Jurisprudence 45, 1-16.
9. Levy N 2002 Deafness, culture, and choice. Journal of Medical Ethics 28, 284-285.
10. Mahowald MB 2000 Genes, Women, Equality. New York: Oxford University Press, New York, p. 121.
11. Nance WE, Pandya A 2002 Genetic epidemiology of deafness. In: Keats BJB, Popper AN and Fay RR (eds) Genetics and Auditory Disorders Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 67-91.
12. Robertson JA 2001 Preconception gender selection. American Journal of Bioethics 1, 2-9.
13. Robertson JA 2003 Procreative liberty in the era of genomics. American Journal of Law and Medicine 29, 439-480.
14. Robertson JA 2004 Procreative liberty and harm to offspring in assisted reproduction. American Journal of Law and Medicine 30, 7-40.
15. Sandel M 2004 The case against perfection. The Atlantic April, 2004. www.theatlantic.com/issues/2004/04/sandel.htm [accessed 17 November 2004].