The effects of scientific regional opportunities in science-technology flows: Evidence from scientific literature in firms patent data

Annals of Regional Science

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 495-522

  Coronado, Daniel ^a   Acosta, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÁDIZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; LITERATURE REVIEW; REGIONAL ECONOMY; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 28744445009     PISSN: 05701864     EISSN: 14320592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-004-0225-6     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Acosta M, Coronado D (2003) Science-technology flows in Spanish regions. An analysis of scientific citations in patents. Research Policy 32: 1783-1803
2. Agrawal A (2001) University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews 3: 285-302
3. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs ZJ (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42: 422-448
4. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs ZJ (2000) Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers of Regional Science 79: 435-443
5. Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D Spillovers and the geography of innovation and Production. American Economic Review 86: 630-640
6. Audretsch DB, Stephan P (1996) Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review 86
7. Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2000) Real options, patents, productivity and market value: Evidence from a panel of British firms. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, Working Paper 00/21
8. Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J (1999) Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British Manufacturing Firms. Review of Economic Studies 66: 529-554
9. Branstetter L (2001) Exploring the link between academic science and industrial innovation: The case of California's research universities. 2001 NBER Conference
10. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1990) Regression based test for overdispersion in the Poisson model. Journal of Econometrics 46: 347-364
11. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1986) Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1: 29-54
12. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press, New York
13. Cockburn IM, Henderson RM (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics 46: 157-182
14. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99: 569-596
15. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152
16. Collins P, Wyatt S (1988) Citations in patents to the basic research literature. Research Policy 17: 65-77
17. Crepon B, Duguet E (1997) Research and development, competition and innovation. Pseudomaximum likelihood and simulated maximum likelihood methods applied to count data models with heterogeneity. Journal of Econometrics 79: 355-378
18. Eicker F (1967) Limit theorems for regressions with unequal and dependent errors. In: LeCam L, Neyman J (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press Berkeley, pp. 59-82
19. Feldman M, Florida R (1994) The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84: 210-229
20. Fischer M, Varga A (2003) Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from austria. Annals of Regional Science 37: 303-322
21. Fritsch M, Schwirten C (1999) Enterprise-University cooperation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation 6: 69-83
22. Goe R, Lentneck B, MacPherson A, Phillips D (2000) Toward a contact-based theory of producer service location. Environment and Planning A 32: 131-147
23. Greene W (1994) Accounting for excess zeros and sample selection in poisson and negative binomial regression models. Working Paper no EC-94-10, Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University
24. Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92-116.
25. Griliches Z (1981) Market value, R&D and patents. Economic Letters 7: 183-187
26. Grupp H, Schmoch U (1992) Perception of scientification as measured by referencing between patents and papers. In: Grupp H (ed) Dynamics of Science-Based Innovation. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg New York, pp. 73-128
27. Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) Market value and patent citations: a first look. NBER Working Paper 7741
28. Jaffe A (1989) The real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79: 957-970
29. Jaffe A, Fogarty M, Banks (1998) Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other labs on commercial innovations. Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (2)
30. Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577-598
31. Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (1996) Flows of knowledge from Universities and Federal Labs: Modelling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. NBER working paper no 5712
32. Klevorick AK, Levin R, Nelson R, Winter S (1995) On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24: 342-349
33. Lambert D (1992) Cero-inflated poisson regression, with an application to the defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 34: 1-14
34. Lim K (2000) The many faces of a asortive capacity: Spillovers of Copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Mimeo, MIT
35. Lundvall B, Borras S (1997) The globalization learning economy: Implications for innovation policy. Report for the DG XII Commission
36. MacPherson A (2002) The contribution of academic-industry interaction to product innovation: The case of New York State's medical device sector. Papers in Regional Science 81: 121-129
37. Mansfield E (1991) Academic research and innovation. Research Policy 20: 1-12
38. Mansfield E (1998) Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy 26: 773-776
39. Maurseth PB, Verspagen B (1999) Knowledge spillovers in Europe. A patent citation analysis. Paper presented at the CRENOS conference on "Technological externalities and spatial localisation"
40. Mcmillan GS, Narin F, Deeds DL (2000) An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy 29: 1-8
41. Meyer M (2000a) Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy 29: 409-434
42. Meyer M(2000b) What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics 49: 93-123
43. Meyer M (2000c) Patent citations in a novel field of technology. What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics 48: 151-178
44. Meyer M (2002) Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems. Scientometrics 54 (2): 193-212
45. Meyer-Krahmer F, Schmoch U (1998) Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 27: 835-851
46. Mullahy J (1986) Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics 33: 341-365
47. Narin F, Hamilton KS, Olivastro D (1995) Linkage between agency-supported research and patented industrial technology. Research Evaluation 5: 183-187
48. Narin F, Hamilton KS, Olivastro D (1997) The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy 26: 317-330
49. Narin F, Olivastro D (1992) Status report: Linkage between technology and science. Research Policy 21: 237-249
50. Narin F, Olivastro D (1998) Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics 41: 51-59
51. Noyons ECM, Van Raan AFJ, Grupp H, Schmoch U (1994) Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine research. Research Policy 23: 443-457
52. Pavit K (1998) The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy 27: 793-805
53. Salter AJ, Martin BR (2001) The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: A critical review. Research Policy 30: 209-532
54. Schartinger D, Rammer C, Fischer MM, Fröhlich J (2002) Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 31: 303-328
55. Schmoch U (1993) Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics 26: 193-211
56. Tijssen RJW (2001) Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy 30: 35-54
57. Tijssen RJW (2002) Science dependence of technologies: Evidence from inventions and their inventors. Research Policy 31: 509-526
58. Tijssen RJW, Buter RK, Van Leeuwen TN (2000) Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics 47: 389-412
59. Van Vianen BG, Moed HF, Van Raan AFJ (1990) An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy 19: 61-81
60. Varga A (1998) University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
61. Verbeek A, Debackere K, Luwel M, Andres P, Zimmermann E, Deleus F (2002) Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic reference in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics 54: 339-420
62. Verspagen B, Schoenmakers W (2000) The spatial dimension of knowledge spillovers in Europe: Evidence from firm patenting data. AEA Conference, Alicante, Spain
63. Vuong Q (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57: 307-334
64. White H (1982) Maximun likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50: 1-25
65. Zucker L, Darby M, Armstrong J (2000) University science, venture capital, and the performance of U. S. biotechnology firms. Mimeo, University of California, Los Angeles