For whom the bells toll: Demography of the last population of the butterfly Euphydryas maturna in the Czech Republic

Biologia - Section Zoology

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 551-557

  Konvička, Martin ^a,b   Čížek, Oldřich ^a,b   Filipová, Ladislava ^c   Fric, Zdeněk ^a,b   Beneš, Jiří ^a   Křupka, Michal ^c   Zámečník, Jaroslav ^d   Dočkalová, Zuzana ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^c PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d Muzeum Vychodnich Cech   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Butterfly conservation; Dispersal; Dynamic metapopulation; Linear modelling; Mark release recapture; Woodland management

Indexed keywords

EUPHYDRYAS; EUPHYDRYAS MATURNA; LEPIDOPTERA; NYMPHALIDAE;

EID: 28444466225     PISSN: 13356380     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ARNASON, A.N., SCHWARZ, C.J. & BOYER, G. 1998. POPAN-5. A data maintenance and analysis system for mark-recapture data. Scientific Report, Department of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, vii+265 pp.
2. BAGUETTE, M. 2003. Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly. Ecography 26: 153-160.
3. BAGUETTE, M., PETIT, S. & QUEVA, F. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 100-108.
4. BAGUETTE, M. & SCHTICKZELLE, N. 2003. Local population dynamics are important to the conservation of metapopulations in highly fragmented landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 40: 404-412.
5. BENES, J., KONVIČKA, M., DVOŘÁK, J., FRIC, Z., HAVELDA, Z., PAVLÍČKO, A., VRABEC, V. & WEIDENHOFFER, Z. 2002. Motýli České republiky: rozšíř ení a ochrana [Butterflies of the Czech Republic: Distribution and Conservation] I., II. SOM, Prague, 857 pp.
6. BERGMAN, K.O. & KINDVALL, O. 2004. Population viability analysis of the butterfly Lopinga achine in a changing landscape in Sweden. Ecography 27: 49-58.
7. BERGMAN, K.O. & LANDIN, J. 2002. Population structure and movements of a threatened butterfly (Lopinga achine) in a fragmented landscape in Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 108: 361-369.
8. CIZEK O. & KONVICKA M. (in press). What is a patch in a dynamic metapopulation? Mobility of an endangered woodland butterfly, Euphydryas maturna. Ecography 28.
9. COOCH, E. & WHITE, G. 2001. Program Mark: A gentle introduction. http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/mark_book.zip. 15.2.2004.
10. ELIASSON, C.U. 1991. Studier av boknätfjärilens, Euphydryas maturna (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), förekomst och biology i Västmanland. Entomol. Tidskr. 112: 113-124.
11. ELIASSON, C.U. 2001. Studier av boknatfjarilen (Euphydryas maturna) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) i Vastmanland 2 - Fenologi, protandri, konskvot och parningslek. Entomol. Tidskr. 122: 153-167.
12. ELIASSON, C.U. & SHAW, M.R. 2003. Prolonged life cycles, oviposition sites, foodplants and Cotesia parasitoids of Melitaeini butterflies in Sweden. Oedippus 21: 1-42.
13. ELLNER, S.P. & FUSSMANN, G. 2003. Effects of successional dynamics on metapopulation persistence. Ecology 84: 882-889.
14. FRIC, Z. & KONVIČKA, M. 2000. Adult population structure and behaviour of two seasonal generations of the European Map Butterfly, Araschnia levana, species with seasonal polyphenism (Nymphalidae). Nota Lepid. 23: 2-25.
15. HELLMANN, J.J., WEISS, S.B., MCLAUGHLIN, J.F., BOGGS, C.L., EHRLICH, P.R., LAUNER, A.E. & MURPHY, D.D. 2003. Do hypotheses from short-term studies hold in the long-term? An empirical test. Ecol. Entomol. 28: 74-84.
16. HILL, J.K., THOMAS, C.D. & LEWIS, O.T. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: Implications for metapopulation structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 725-735.
17. HÖTTINGER, H. & PENNERSTORFER, J. 1999. Rote Listen ausgewählter Tiergruppen Niederösterreichs - Tagfalter (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera & Hesperiidae). Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, Abteilung Naturschutz, St. Pölten, 128 pp.
18. JOHNSON, M.P. 2000. The influence of patch demographics on metapopulations, with particular reference to successional landscapes. Oikos 88: 67-74.
19. JOYCE, D.A. & PULLIN, A.S. 2003. Conservation implications of the distribution of genetic diversity at different scales: a case study using the marsh fritillary butterfly (Euphydryas aurinia). Biol. Conserv. 114: 453-461.
20. KEMP, D.J. & WIKLUND, C. 2001. Fighting without weaponry: a review of male-male contest competition in butterflies Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 429-442.
21. KOMONEN, A. 1997. Kirjoverkkoperhosen (Euphydryas maturna) ja punakeltaverkkoperhosen (Euphydryas aurinia) loiskilto jen rakenne Suomessa. Baptria 22: 105-109.
22. KONVIČKA, M. & KURAS, T. 1999. Population structure and the selection of oviposition sites of the endangered butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in the Litovelské Pomoraví, Czech Republic. J. Insect Conserv. 3: 211-223.
23. KUDRNA, O. 2001. Zur Bestandssituation von Tagfalterarten auf einigen durch die Schwammspinnerkalamität von 1993 bis 1995 betroffenen Flächen im südlichen Steigerwald. Oedippus 19: 1-30.
24. KUDRNA, O. 2002. The distribution atlas of European butterflies. Oedippus 20: 1-343.
25. LEBRETON, J., BURNHAM, K.P., CLOBERT, J. & ANDERSON, D.R. 1992. Modelling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 67-118.
26. MCLAUGHLIN, J.F., HELLMANN, J.J., BOGGS, C.L. & EHRLICH, P.R. 2002a. The route to extinction: population dynamics of a threatened butterfly. Oecologia 132: 538-548.
27. MCLAUGHLIN, J.F., HELLMANN, J.J., BOGGS, C.L. & EHRLICH, P.R. 2002b. Climate change hastens population extinctions. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 6070-6074.
28. PETIT, S., MOILANEN, A., HANSKI, I. & BAGUETTE, M. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. Oikos 92: 491-500.
29. POLLOCK, K.H., NICHOLS, J.D., BROWNIE, C. & HINES, J.E. 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107: 1-97.
30. PRADEL, R. 1996. Utilization of capture-mark-recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics 52: 703-709.
31. REED, D.H., O'GRADY, J.J., BROOK, B.W., BALLOU, J.D. & FRANKHAM, R. 2003. Estimates of minimum viable population sizes for vertebrates and factors influencing those estimates. Biol. Conserv. 113: 23-34.
32. SCHILLER, R. & GRAUL, M. 2000. Zur Situation von Euphydryas maturna, Maculinea nausithous und M. teleius in der Region Leipzig - ein Zwischenbericht. Insecta, Berlin 6: 54-56.
33. SCHTICKZELLE, N., BAGUETTE, M. & LE BOULENGE, E. 2003. Modelling insect demography from capture-recapture data: comparison between the constrained linear models and the Jolly-Seber analytical method. Can. Entomol. 135: 313-323.
34. SCHTICKZELLE, N., LE BOULENGE, E. & BAGUETTE, M. 2002. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population. Oikos 97: 349-360.
35. SCHWARZ, C.J. & ARNASON, A.N. 1996. A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics 52: 860-873
36. SCHWARZ, C.J., BAILEY, R.E., IRVINE, J.R. & DALZIEL, F.C. 1993. Estimating salmon spawning escapement using capture-recapture methods. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 1181-1197.
37. SELONEN, V. 1997. Kirjoverkkoperhosen (Euphydryas maturna) ja ratamoverkkoperhosen (Mellicta athalia) populaatiorakenne ja habitaatinvalinta. Baptria 22: 137-144.
38. SPARKS, T.H., PORTER, K., GREATOREX-DAVIES, J.N., HALL, M.L. & MARRS, R.H. 1994. The choice of oviposition sites in woodland by the Duke of Burgundy butterfly Hamearis lucina in England. Biol. Conserv. 70: 257-264.
39. S-PLUS 2000. 1999. S-Plus Guide to Statistics, Vol. 1. Data Analysis Products Division, MathSoft, Seattle, WA, 650 pp.
40. VANDEWOESTIJNE, S. & BAGUETTE, M. 2004. Demographic versus genetic dispersal measures. Popul. Ecol. 46: 281-285.
41. VAN SWAAY, C.A.M. & WARREN, M.S. 1999. Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment Series No. 99. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 260 pp.
42. VAN SWAAY, C.A.M. & WARREN, M.S. 2003. Prime butterfly areas in Europe: Priority sites for conservation. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, The Netherlands, 695 pp.
43. VRABEC, V. 1994. Příspěvek k poznání rozšíření druhu Euphydryas maturna (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) v Čechách. Muzeum a Současnost, Ser. Natur. 8: 7-14.
44. VRABEC, V. 2001. Vzácný motýl České a Slovenské republiky - hnědásek (hnedáčik) osikový (Euphydryas maturna L.). Hmyz 2 (1): 4-9.
45. VRABEC, V. & JINDRA, Z. 1998. The caterpillars of the rare butterfly Euphydryas maturna (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) as food for the predatory bug Picromerus bidens (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Entomol. Probl. 29: 87-90.
46. WAHLBERG, N. 1998. The life history and ecology of Euphydryas maturna (Nymphalidae: Melitaeini) in Finland. Nota Lepid. 21: 154-169.
47. WAHLBERG, N. 2001. On the status of the scarce fritillary Euphydryas maturna (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Finland. Entomol. Fenn. 12: 244-250.
48. WAHLBERG, N., KLEMETTI, T. & HANSKI, I. 2002a. Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25: 224-232.
49. WAHLBERG, N., KLEMETTI, T., SELONEN, V. & HANSKI, I. 2002b. Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130: 33-43.
50. WARREN, M.S. 1987. The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. III. Population dynamics and the effect of habitat management. J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 499-513.
51. WHITE, G.C. & BURNHAM, K.P. 1999. Program Mark: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46, Suppl.: 120-138.
52. WILLIAMS, B.K., NICHOLS, J.D., & CONROY, M.J. 2001. Analysis and management of animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego, 817 pp.