Remembering parts and wholes: Configural processing in face recollection

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 753-769

  Mäntylä, Timo ^a   Holm, Linus ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; AWARENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACIES; FEMALE; HORSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 28444484657     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440440000258     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bartlett, J. C., & Searcy, J. H. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
2. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
3. Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symmons, L. A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29, 159-170.
4. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 16, 309-313.
5. Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18, 23-30.
6. Gauthier, L., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1681.
7. Geraci, L., & Rajaram, S. (2002). The orthographic distinctiveness effect on direct and indirect tests of memory: Delineating the awareness and processing requirements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 273-291.
8. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
9. Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612.
10. Goldstone, R. L. (2000). Unitization during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 86-112.
11. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 495-514.
12. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421-445.
13. Hunt, R. R., & Seta, C. E. (1984). Category size effects in recall: The roles of individual item and relational information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 282-290.
14. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
15. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
16. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 449-473.
17. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognised: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536.
18. Leder, H., Candrian, G., Huber, O., & Bruce, V. (2001). Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces. Perception, 30, 73-83.
19. Lockhart, R. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 87-112.
20. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
21. Maurer, D., LeGrand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 255-260.
22. Mäntylä, T. (1986). Optimizing cue effectiveness: Recall of 500 and 600 incidentally learned words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 66-71.
23. Mäntylä, T. (1997). Recollection of faces: Remembering differences and knowing similarities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1203-1216.
24. Mäntylä, T., & Cornoldi, C. (2002). Remembering changes: Repetition effects in face recollection. Acta Psychologica, 109, 95-105.
25. Mäntylä, T., & Raudsepp, J. (1996). Recollective experience following suppression of focal attention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 195-203.
26. Moscovitch, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of face processing: An introduction. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 1-11.
27. Palmeri, T. J., Wong, A. C.-N., & Gauthier, L. (2004). Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 378-386.
28. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory and Cognition, 21, 89-102.
29. Rajaram, S. (1996). Perceptual effects on remembering: Recollective processes in picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 365-377.
30. Rajaram, S., & Roediger, H. L., III. (1997). Remembering and knowing as states of consciousness during retrieval. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to the question of consciousness (pp. 213-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1996). Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations, and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 85-158). London: Oxford University Press.
32. Rubin, D. C., & Wallace, W. T. (1989). Rhyme and reason: Analyses of dual retrieval cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 698-709.
33. Searcy, J. H., & Bartlett, J. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of components and spatial-relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 904-915.
34. Smith, R. K., & Hunt, R. R. (2000). The effects of distinctiveness require reinstatement of organization: The importance of intentional memory instructions. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 431-446.
35. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Second-order relational properties and the inversion-effect: Testing a theory of face perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 367-372.
36. Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23, 457-482.
37. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 26, 1-12.
39. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.
40. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
41. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.