Unitization during category learning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 86-112

  Goldstone, Robert L ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0034132926     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.86     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Allen, P. A., Wallace, B., & Weber, T. A. (1995). Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 914-934.
2. Amssey, F. J. (1951). The Komolgorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46, 405-409.
3. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 451-470.
4. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., & Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
5. Besner, D., & Johnston, J. C. (1989). Reading and the mental lexicon: On the uptake of visual information. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 291-316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Birnbaum, Z. W., & Lientz, B. P. (1972). Tables of critical values of some Renyi type statistics for finite sample sizes. American Statistical Association Journal, 42, 870-877.
7. Bruner, J. A., & Postman, L. (1949). Perception, conception, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 18, 14-31.
8. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63-65.
9. Czerwinski, M., Lightfoot, N., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Automatization and training in visual search. The American Journal of Psychology, 105, 271-315.
10. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
11. Dzhafarov, E. N., & Cortese, J. M. (1996). Empirical recovery of response-time decomposition rules: I. Sample-level decomposition tests. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 185-202.
12. Ericsson, K., Chase, W. G., & Faloon, S. (1980, June 10). Acquisition of a memory skill. Science, 208, 1181-1182.
13. Eriksen, C. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 255-260.
14. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a "greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
15. Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M. J., & Tanaka, J. (1998). Training "greeble" experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38, 2401-2428.
16. Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 166-195.
17. Goldstone, R. L. (1994). Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178-200.
18. Goldstone, R. L. (1997). Categorization and unitization (Tech. Rep. No. 186). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Cognitive Science Department.
19. Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612.
20. Goldstone, R. L., & Schyns, P. (1994). Learning new features of representation. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 974-978). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Goldstone, R. L., Steyvers, M., Spencer-Smith, J., & Kersten, A. (1999). Interactions between perceptual and conceptual learning. In E. Diettrich & A. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines (pp. 85-109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Green, D. M., & Luce, R. D. (1971). Detection of auditory signals presented at random times: III. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 257-268.
23. Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (1991). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology, 32, 613-623.
24. Harnad, S. (1987). Categorical perception. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Harnad, S., Hanson, S. J., & Lubin, J. (1994). Learned categorical perception in neural nets: Implications for symbol grounding. In V. Honavar & L. Uhr (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and neural networks: Steps toward principled integration (pp. 191-206). Boston: Academic Press.
26. Hayes-Roth, B., & Hayes-Roth, F. (1977). Concept learning and the recognition and classification of exemplars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 321-338.
27. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
28. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243.
29. Johnson, N. F. (1975). On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 17-29.
30. Johnson, N. F., Turner-Lyga, M., & Pettegrew, B. S. (1986). Part/whole relationships in the processing of small visual patterns. Memory & Cognition, 14, 5-16.
31. Jonides, J., & Gleitman, H. (1972). A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 457-460.
32. Julesz, B. (1981, March 17). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interaction. Nature, 290, 91-97.
33. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
34. Korner, T. W. (1990). Fourier analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual-field. Psychological Science, 6, 381-386.
36. Kurtz, K. J. (1996). Category-based similarity. In G. W. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 290). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
38. LaBerge, D. (1973). Attention and the measurement of perceptual learning. Memory & Cognition, 1, 268-276.
39. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
40. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
41. Lane, H. (1965). The motor theory of speech perception: A critical review. Psychological Review, 72, 275-309.
42. Lin, E. L., & Murphy, G. L. (1997). Effects of background knowledge on object categorization and part detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1153-1169.
43. Livingston, K. R., Andrews, J. K., & Harnad, S. (1998). Categorical perception effects induced by category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 3, 732-753.
44. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
45. Logan, G. D. (1992). Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning-curves: A test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 883-914.
46. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552-563.
47. Mordkoff, J. T., & Egeth, H. E. (1993). Response time and accuracy revisited: Converging support for the interactive race model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 981-991.
48. Nahinsky, I. D., Slaymaker, F. L., Aamiry, A., & O'Brien, C. J. (1973). The concreteness of attributes in concept learning strategies. Memory & Cognition, 1, 307-318.
49. Niedenthal, P. M., & Kitayama, S. (1994). The heart's eye. San Diego: Academic Press.
50. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
51. O'Hara, W. (1980). Evidence in support of word unitization. Perception and Psychophysics, 27, 390-402.
52. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., & Noel, R. W. (1984). Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 413-428.
53. Palmer, S. E. (1978). Structural aspects of visual similarity. Memory & Cognition, 6, 91-97.
54. Palmer, S. E. (1992). Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 436-447.
55. Palmer, S. E., & Rock, I. (1994). Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 29-55.
56. Perrett, D. I., & Oram, M. W. (1993). Neurophysiology of shape processing. Image and Vision Computing, 11, 317-333.
57. Pevtzow, R., & Goldstone, R. L. (1994). Categorization and the parsing of objects. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 717-722). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Rosenbloom, P. S., & Newell, A. (1987). An integrated computational model of stimulus-response compatibility and practice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 21, 1-52.
59. Saiki, J., & Hummel, J. E. (1996). Attribute conjunctions and the part configuration advantage in object category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1002-1119.
60. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
61. Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L., & Thibaut, J. (1998). Development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-54.
62. Schyns, P. G., & Murphy, G. L. (1993). The ontogeny of transformable part representations in object concepts. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 197-202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Schyns, P. G., & Murphy, G. L. (1994). The ontogeny of part representation in object concepts. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 31, pp. 305-354). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
64. Schyns, P. G., & Rodet, L. (1997). Categorization creates functional features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 681-696.
65. Shepp, B. E., & Barren, S. E. (1991). The development of perceived structure and attention: Evidence from divided and selective attention tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 434-458.
66. Sheu, C.-F., & Ratcliff, R. (1995). The application of Fourier deconvolution to reaction time data: A cautionary note. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 234-251.
67. Shiffrin, R. M., & Lightfoot, N. (1997). Perceptual learning of alphanumeric-like characters. In R. L. Goldstone, P. G. Schyns, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 36, pp. 45-82). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
68. Smith, E. E., & Haviland, S. E. (1972). Why words are perceived more accurately than nonwords: Inference versus unitization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 59-64.
69. Smith, P. L. (1990). Obtaining meaningful results from Fourier deconvolution of reaction time data. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 533-550.
70. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
71. Tanaka, J., & Gauthier, I. (1997). Expertise in object and face recognition. In R. L. Goldstone, P. G. Schyns, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 36, pp. 83-126). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
72. Tao, L., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (1997). Utilization in second-language learning: Evidence from letter detection. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 385-395.
73. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54.
74. Townsend, J. T., Hu, G. G., & Ashby, F. G. (1981). Perceptual sampling of orthogonal straight-line features. Psychological Research, 43, 259-275.
75. Townsend, J. T., Hu, G. G., & Kadlec, H. (1988). Feature sensitivity, bias, and interdependencies as a function of energy and payoffs. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 575-591.
76. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
77. Treisman, A., Vieira, A., & Hayes, A. (1992). Automaticity and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362.
78. Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., & Green, M. (1994). Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 495-500.
79. Weisstein, N., & Harris, C. S. (1974, May 8). Visual detection of line segments: An object-superiority effect. Science, 186, 752-755.
80. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Languages and logic. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 233-245). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1941)
81. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.