The future of a mutation-limited tool-box

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1158-1161

  Van Dooren, T J M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MUTATION; NOTE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; EVOLUTION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUTATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION (GENETICS);

EID: 28444483191     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00881.x     Document Type: Note

References (32)

1. Bolnick, D.I. & Doebeli, M. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57: 2433-2449.
2. Bulmer, M.G. 1980. The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Bulmer, M.G. & Taylor, P.D. 1981. Worker-queen conflict and sex ratio theory in social Hymenoptera. Heredity 47: 197-207.
4. Charlesworth, B. 1994. Evolution in Age-Structured Populations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Charnov, E.L. 1979. The genetical evolution of patterns of sexuality: Darwinian fitness. American Naturalist 113: 465-480.
6. Clarke, B.C. 1979. The evolution of genetic diversity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205: 453-474.
7. Dieckmann, U. & Doebeli, M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 354-357.
8. Dieckmann, U. & Law, R. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34: 579-612.
9. Eshel, I. 1983. Evolutionary and continuous stability. J. Theor. Biol. 103: 99-111.
10. Eshel, I. & Motro, U. 1981. Kin selection and strong evolutionary stability of mutual help. Theor. Pop. Biol. 19: 420-433.
11. Ewens, W.J. 1969. Population Genetics. Methuen & Co, London.
12. Ferrière, R. & Clobert, J. 1992. Evolutionary stable age at 1st reproduction in a density-dependent model. J. Theor. Biol. 157: 253-267.
13. Ferrière, R. & Gatto, M. 1993. Chaotic population-dynamics can result from natural-selection Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 251: 33-38.
14. Fisher, R. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
15. Friesen, M.L., Saxer, G., Travisano, M. & Doebeli, M. 2004. Experimental evidence for sympatric ecological diversification due to frequency-dependent competition in Escherichia coli. Evolution 58: 245-260.
16. Gatto, M. 1993. The evolutionary optimality of oscillatory and chaotic dynamics in simple population-models. Theor. Pop. Biol. 43: 310-336.
17. Geritz, S.A.H. & Kisdi, É. 2000. Adaptive dynamics in diploid, sexual populations and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 1671-1678.
18. Gillespie, J.H. 1984. Molecular evolution over the mutational landscape. Evolution 38: 1116-1129.
19. Hammerstein, P. 1996. Darwinian adaptation, population genetics and the streetcar theory of evolution. J. Math. Biol. 34: 511-532.
20. Kisdi, É. & Meszéna, G. 1995. Life histories with lottery competition in a stochastic environment: ESSs which do not prevail. Theor. Pop. Biol. 47: 191-211.
21. Leimar, O. in press. Multidimensional convergence stability and the canonical adaptive dynamics. In: Elements of Adaptive Dynamics (U. Dieckmann & J. A. J. Metz, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Maynard Smith, J. 1970. Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature 225: 563-564.
23. Metz, J.A.J. & de Roos, A. 1992. The role of physiologically stuctured population models within a general individual-based modeling perspective. In: Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology: Populations, Communities and Ecosystems (D. L. DeAngelis & L. J. Gross, eds), pp. 183-231. Chapman & Hall, New York.
24. Metz, J.A.J., Nisbet, R.M. & Geritz, S.A.H. 1992. How should we define fitness for general ecological scenarios? TREE 7: 198-202.
25. Metz, J.A.J., Geritz, S.A.H., Meszéna, G., Jacobs, F.J.A. & van Heerwaarden, J. 1996. Adaptive dynamics: a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In: Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems (S. J. Van Strien & S. M. Verduyn Lunel, eds), pp. 183-231. KNAW Verhandelingen, North Holland, Amsterdam.
26. Mueller, L.D. & Joshi, A. 2000. Stability in Model Populations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
27. Turchin, P. 2003. Complex Population Dynamics: A Theoretical/ Empirical Synthesis. Monographs in Population Biology, 35, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
28. Van Dooren, T.J.M. 1999. The evolutionary ecology of dominance- recessivity. J. Theor. Biol. 198: 519-532.
29. Van Dooren, T.J.M. & Metz, J.A.J. 1998. Delayed maturation in temporally structured populations with non-equilibrium dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 41-62.
30. Van Dooren, T.J.M., Durinx, M. & Demon, I. 2004. Sexual dimorphism or evolutionary branching? Evol. Ecol. Res 6: 857-871.
31. van Doorn, G.S. & Weissing, F.J. 2001. Ecological versus sexual selection models of sympatric speciation. Selection 2: 17-40.
32. Waxman, D. & Gavrilets, S. 2005. 20 Questions on adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1139-1154.