Adaptive dynamics as a mathematical tool for studying the ecology of speciation processes

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1194-1200

  Doebeli, M ^a   Dieckmann, U ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MATHEMATICS; METHODOLOGY; MUTATION; NOTE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GENETICS, POPULATION; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MUTATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 28444488010     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00912.x     Document Type: Note

References (44)

1. Abrams, P.A., Matsuda, H. & Harada, Y. 1993. Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 7: 465-487.
2. Arnegard, M.E. & Kondrashov, A.S. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely. Evolution 58: 222-237.
3. Bolnick, D.I. 2004. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58: 895-899.
4. Bolnick, D. & Doebeli, M. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57: 2433-2449.
5. Bowers, R.G., White, A., Boots, M., Geritz, S.A.H. & Kisdi, E. 2003. Evolutionary branching/speciation: contrasting results from systems with explicit or emergent carrying capacities. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 883-891.
6. Christiansen, F.B. 1991. On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuously varying trait. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7: 13-38.
7. Claessen, D. & Dieckmann, U. 2002. Ontogenetic niche shifts and evolutionary branching in size-structured populations. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 189-217.
8. Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Reprinted 1964. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
9. Dieckmann, U. & Doebeli, M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 354-357.
10. Dieckmann, U. & Doebeli, M. 2004. Adaptive dynamics of speciation: sexual populations. In: Adaptive Speciation (U. Dieckmann, M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz & D. Tautz, eds), pp. 76-111 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Dieckmann, U., Doebeli, M., Metz, J.A.J. & Tautz, D. (eds) 2004. Adaptive Speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Diehl, S.R. & Bush, G.L. 1989. The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. In: Speciation and its Consequences (D. Otte & J. Endler, eds), pp. 345-365. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
13. Doebeli, M. 2002. A model for the evolutionary dynamics of cross-feeding polymorphisms in microorganisms. Popul. Ecol. 44: 59-70.
14. Doebeli, M. 2005. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits. J. Evol. Biol. (in press).
15. Doebeli, M. & Ruxton, G.D. 1997. Evolution of dispersal rates in metapopulation models: branching and cyclic dynamics in phenotype space. Evolution 51: 1730-1741.
16. Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 156: S77-S101.
17. Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. 2003. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421: 259-264.
18. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35: 124-238.
19. Friesen, M., Saxer, G., Travisano, M. & Doebeli, M. 2004. Experimental evidence for sympatric ecological diversification due to frequency-dependent competition in Escherichia coli. Evolution 58: 245-260.
20. Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, É., Meszéna, G. & Metz, J.A.J. 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. Res. 12: 35-57.
21. Kassen, R. 2002. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 173-190.
22. Kawecki, T.J. 2004. Genetic theories of sympatric speciation. In: Adaptive Speciation (U. Dieckmann, M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz & D. Tautz, eds), pp. 36-53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
23. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ravigné, V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159: S22-S35.
24. Kirkpatrick, M. & Nuismer, S.L. 2004. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. B 271: 687-693.
25. Kisdi, É. 1999. Evolutionary branching under asymmetric competition. J. Theor. Biol. 197: 149-162.
26. Kisdi, É. & Geritz, S.A.H. 1999. Adaptive dynamics in allele space: evolution of genetic polymorphism by small mutations in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 53: 993-1008.
27. Kondrashov, A.S. 1986. Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. III. Computer simulations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 29: 1-15.
28. Kondrashov, A.S. & Kondrashov, F.A. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 351-354.
29. Law, R., Bronstein, J.L. & Ferrière, R. 2001. On mutualists and exploiters: plant-insect coevolution in pollinating seed-parasite systems. J. Theor. Biol. 212: 373-389.
30. Maire, N., Ackermann, M. & Doebeli, M. 2001. On the evolution of anisogamy through evolutionary branching. Selection 2: 107-119.
31. Matessi, C., Gimelfarb, A. & Gavrilets, S. 2001. Long-term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go?. Selection 2: 41-64.
32. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100: 637-650.
33. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
34. Meszéna, G., Czibula, I. & Geritz, S.A.H. 1997. Adaptive dynamics in a 2-patch environment: a toy model for allopatric and parapatric speciation. J. Biol. Syst. 5: 265-284.
35. Metz, J.A.J., Geritz, S.A.H., Meszéna, G., Jacobs, F.J.A. & van Heerwaarden, J.S. 1996. Adaptive dynamics: a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In: Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems, Proceedings of the Royal Dutch Academy of Science (KNAW Verhandelingen) (S. J. van Strien & S. M. Verduyn Lunel, eds), pp. 183-231. North Holland, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
36. Mizera, F. & Meszéna, G. 2003. Spatial niche packing, character displacement and adaptive speciation along an environmental gradient. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 363-382.
37. Rainey, P.B. & Travisano, M. 1998. Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394: 69-72.
38. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1978. Competitive speciation. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 10: 275-289.
39. Seger, J. 1985. Intraspecific resource competition as a cause of sympatric speciation. In: Evolution: Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith (P. J. Greenwood, P. H. Harvey & M. Slatkin, eds), pp. 43-53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Parvinen, K. 1999. Evolutionary branching of dispersal strategies in structured metapopulations. J. Math. Biol. 45: 106-124.
41. Travisano, M. & Rainey, P.B. 2000. Studies of adaptive radiation using model microbial systems. Am. Nat. 156: S35-S44.
42. Van Doorn, G.S., Dieckmann, U. & Weissing, F.J. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: a critical re-evaluation. Am. Nat. 163: 709-725.
43. Van Doorn, G.S., Luttikhuizen, P.C. & Weissing, F.J. 2001. Sexual selection at the protein level drives the extraordinary divergence of sex related genes during sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 2155-2161.
44. Waxman, D. & Gavrilets, S. 2005. 20 Questions on adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1139-1154.