Erratum: Computer simulation of stepping in the hind legs of the cat: An examination of mechanisms regulating the stance-to-swing transition (Journal of Neurophysiology (December 2005) 94, (4256-4268) DOI: 10.1152/jn.00065.2005);Computer simulation of stepping in the hind legs of the cat: An examination of mechanisms regulating the stance-to-swing transition

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 94, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 4256-4268

  Ekeberg, Örjan ^a   Pearson, Keir ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANKLE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CAT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAIT; HIP DISEASE; LEG; LEG MOVEMENT; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; WALKING;

EID: 28144440129     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01303.2005     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Brown IE, Scott SH, and Loeb GE. Mechanics of feline soleus. II. Design and validation of a mathematical model. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 17: 221-233, 1996.
2. Butt SJ, Harris-Warrick RM, and Kiehn O. Firing properties of identified interneuron populations in the mammalian hindlimb central pattern generator. J Neurosci 22: 9961-9971, 2002.
3. Carlson-Kuhta P, Trank TV, and Smith JL. Forms of forward quadrupedal locomotion. II. A comparison of posture, hindlimb kinematics, and motor patterns for upslope and level walking. J Neurophysiol 79: 1687-1701, 1998.
4. Cazalets JR, Borde M, and Clarac F. Localization and organization of the central pattern generator for hindlimb locomotion in newborn rat. J Neurosci 16: 298-306, 1995.
5. Conway BA, Hultborn H, and Kiehn O. Proprioceptive input resets central locomotor rhythm in the spinal cat. Exp Brain Res 68: 643-656, 1987.
6. Donelan JM and Pearson KG. Contribution of force feedback to ankle extensor activity in decerebrate walking cats. J Neurophysiol 92: 2093-2104, 2004.
7. Duysens J and Pearson KG. Inhibition of flexor burst generation by loading ankle extensor muscles in walking cats. Brain Res 187: 321-332, 1980.
8. Ekeberg Ö, Blümel M, and Büschges A. Dynamic simulation of insect walking. Arthropod Struct Dev 33: 287-300, 2004.
9. Engberg I and Lundberg A. An electromyographic analysis of muscular activity in the hindlimb of the cat during unrestrained locomotion. Acta Physiol Scand 75: 614-630, 1969.
10. Fukuoka Y, Kimura H, and Cohen AH. Adaptive dynamic walking of a quadruped robot on irregular terrain based on biological concepts. Int J Robotics Res 22: 187-202, 2003.
11. Goslow GE, Reinking RM, and Stuart DG. The cat step cycle: hind limb joint angles and muscle lengths during unrestrained locomotion. J Morphol 141: 1-42, 1973.
12. Grillner S and Rossignol S. On the initiation of the swing phase of locomotion in chronic spinal cats. Brain Res 146: 269-277, 1978.
13. Guertin P, Angel M, Perreault M-C, and McCrea DA. Ankle extensor group I afferents excite extensors throughout the hindlimb during fictive locomotion in the cat. J Physiol 487: 197-209, 1995.
14. Hiebert GW, Whelan PJ, Prochazka A, and Pearson KG. Contribution of hindlimb flexor muscle afferents to the timing of phase transitions in the cat step cycle. J Neurophysiol 75: 1126-1137, 1996.
15. Hoy MG and Zernicke RF. Modulation of limb dynamics in the swing phase of locomotion. J Biomech 18: 49-60, 1985.
16. Ivashko DG, Prilutsky BI, Markin SN, Chapin JK, and Rybak IA. Modeling the spinal cord neural circuitry controlling cat hindlimb movement during locomotion. Neurocomputing 52-54: 621-629, 2003.
17. Kiehn O. Electrophysiological effects of 5-HT on vertebrate neurons. In: Aspects of Synaptic Transmission: LTP, Galanin, Opioids, Autonomic and 5-HT, edited by Stone TW. London: Taylor and Francis, 1991, p. 330-357.
18. Kjaerulff O and Kiehn O. Distribution of networks generating and coordinating locomotor activity in the neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro: a lesion study. J Neurosci 16: 5777-5794, 1996.
19. Kriellaars DJ, Brownstone RM, Noga BR, and Jordan LM. Mechanical entrainment of fictive locomotion in the decerebrate cat. J Neurophysiol 71: 2074-2086, 1994.
20. Lam T and Pearson KG. Proprioceptive modulation of hip flexor activity during the swing phase of locomotion in decerebrate cats. J Neurophysiol 86: 1321-1332, 2001.
21. Lam T and Pearson KG. The role of proprioceptive feedback in the regulation and adaptation of locomotor activity. In: Sensorimotor Control of Movement and Posture, edited by Gandevia SC, Proske U, and Stuart DG. New York: Kluwer Academic, 2002, p. 343-356.
22. McCrea DA. Spinal circuitry of sensorimotor control of locomotion. J Physiol 533: 41-50, 2001.
23. Miller S, van der Burg J, and van der Meche FGA. Locomotion in the cat: basic programmes of movement. Brain Res 91: 239-253, 1975.
24. Orsal D, Cabelguen J-M, and Perret C. Imerlimb coordination during fictive locomotion in the thalamic cat. Exp Brain Res 82: 536-546, 1990.
25. Pang MYC and Yang JF. The initiation of the swing phase in human infant stepping: importance of hip position and leg loading. J Physiol 528: 389-404, 2000.
26. Pang MYC and Yang JF. Sensory gating for the initiation of the swing phase in different directions of human infant stepping. J Neurosci 22: 5734-5740, 2002.
27. Pearson KG. Generating the walking gait: role of sensory feedback. Prog Brain Res 143: 123-132, 2003.
28. Pearson KG, Donelan JM, and McVea D. Initiation of stance phase activity in walking cats: a possible role for hip afferents. Soc Neurosci Abstr 33: 276.14, 2003.
29. Prochazka A. Proprioceptive feedback and movement regulation. In: Handbook of Physiology, Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems, edited by Rowell LB and Sheperd JT. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1996, p. 89-127.
30. Quinn RD, Nelson GM, Bachmann RJ, Kingsley DA, Offi JT, Alien TJ, and Ritzmann RE. Parallel complementary strategies for implementing biological principles into mobile robots. Int J Robotics Res 22: 169-186, 2003.
31. Ritzmann RE, Quinn RD, and Fischer MS. Convergent evolution and locomotion through complex terrain by insects, vertebrates and robots. Arthropod Struct Dev 33: 361-379, 2004.
32. Rossignol S. Control of Stereotypic limb movements. In: Handbook of Physiology, Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems, edited by Rowell LB and Sheperd JT. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 1996, p. 173-216.
33. Smith JL, Carlson-Kuhta P, and Trank TV. Forms of forward quadrupedal locomotion. III. A comparison of posture, hindlimb kinematics, and motor patterns for downslope and level walking. J Neurophysiol 79: 1702-1716, 1998.
34. Stokke MF, Nissen UV, Glover JC, and Kiehn O. Projection patterns of commissural interneurons in the lumbar spinal cord of the neonatal rat. J Comp Neurol 446: 349-359, 2002.
35. Taga G. A model of the neuro-musculo-skeletal system for anticipatory adjustment of human locomotion during obstacle avoidance. Biol Cybern 78: 9-17, 1998.
36. Whelan PJ, Hiebert GW, and Pearson KG. Stimulation of the group I extensor afferents prolongs the stance phase in walking cats. Exp Brain Res 103: 20-30, 1995.
37. Whelan PJ and Pearson KG. Comparison of the effects of stimulating extensor group I afferents on cycle period during walking in conscious and decerebrate cats. Exp Brain Res 117: 444-452, 1997.
38. Yakovenko S, Gritsenko V, and Prochazka A. Contribution of stretch reflexes to locomotor control: a modeling study. Biol Cybern 90: 146-155, 2004.
39. Yakovenko S, Mushahwar V, VanderHorst V, Holstege G, and Prochazka A. Spatiotemporal activation of lumbosacral motoneurons in the locomotor step cycle. J Neurophysiol 87: 1342-1353, 2002.