Textbook technology supplements: What are they good for?

Communication Education

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 243-253

  Sellnow, Deanna D ^a   Child, Jeffrey T ^a   Ahlfeldt, Stephanie L ^b  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Université du Québec à Montréal   (United States)

Author keywords

Higher Education; Instructional Supplements; Public Speaking; Technology Enhanced Learning; Textbook Marketing

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944486572     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520500356360     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48, 109-126.
2. Carrell, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (2001). Variations in learning, motivation, and perceived immediacy between live and distance education classrooms. Communication Education, 50, 230-240.
3. Chen, M. (1986). Gender and computers: The beneficial effects of experience on attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, 265-282.
4. Chua, S. L., Chen, D. T., & Wong, A. F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 609-624.
5. Clery, S., & Lee, J. (2002, February). Institutional technology comes of age. National Education Association Higher Education Research Center Updates, 8(1), Retrieved January 20, 2004 from http://www.nea.org/he/heupdate/ vol8no1.pdf
6. Colley, A. M., Gale, M. T., & Harris, T. A. (1994). Effects of gender role identity and experience on computer attitude components. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10, 129-137.
7. Cronin, M. W. (1994). Interactive video instruction for teaching organizational techniques in public speaking. Basic Communication Course Annual, 11, 19-35.
8. Daly, J. A. (2002). After 50: Reflecting on the future. Communication Education, 51, 376-382.
9. DeLoughry, T. J. (1993, April 28). Two researchers say 'technophobia' may afflict millions of students. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A25-A26.
10. Downing, J., & Garmon, C. (2001). Teaching students in the basic course how to use presentation software. Communication Education, 50, 218-229.
11. Easton, S. S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor's role in online distance learning. Communication Education, 52, 87-105.
12. Hacker, K. L., & Wignall, D. L. (1997). Issues in predicting user acceptance of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in inter-university classroom discussions as an alternative to face-to-face interaction. Communication Reports, 10, 107-114.
13. Honeyman, D. S., & White, W. J. (1987). Computer anxiety in educators learning to use the computer: A preliminary report. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 20, 129-138.
14. Howard, G., & Smith, R. (1986). Computer anxiety in management: Myth or reality. Communications of the ACM, 29, 611-615.
15. Jackson, S., & Wolski, S. (2001). Identification of and adaptation to students' preinstructional beliefs in introductory communication research methods: Contributions of interactive Web technology. Communication Education, 50, 189-205.
16. Kuehn, S. A. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda. Communication Education, 43, 171-183.
17. Lane, D. R., & Shelton, M. W. (2001). The centrality of communication education in classroom computer-mediated communication: Toward a practical and evaluative pedagogy. Communication Education, 50, 241-255.
18. McIlroy, D., Bunting, B., Tierney, K., & Gordon, M. (2001). The relation of gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxieties and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 21-34.
19. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. P. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Roediger, H. L., III. (2005). Why are textbooks so expensive? The Academic Observer, 18, 1-3. Retrieved April 27, 2005, from http://www. psychologicalscience.org/observer
21. Schottenbauer, M. A., Rodriguez, B. F., Glass, C. R., & Arnkoff, D. B. (2004). Computers, anxiety, and gender: An analysis of reactions to the Y2K computer problem. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 67-84.
22. Scott, C. R., & Rockwell, S. C. (1997). The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies. Communication Education, 46, 44-62.
23. Sellnow, D. D. (2003). Public speaking: A process approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworm/Thomson Learning.
24. Shedletsky, L. J., & Aitken, J. E. (2001). The paradoxes of online academic work. Communication Education, 50, 206-217.
25. Sims, J. R. (2003). Streaming student speeches on the Internet: Convenient and "connected" feedback in the basic course. Basic Communication Course Annual, 15, 1-40.
26. Sprague, J. (1993). Retrieving the research agenda for communication education: Asking the pedagogical questions that are "embarrassments to theory. Communication Education, 42, 106-122.
27. Sprague, J. (2002). Communication education: The spiral continues. Communication Education, 51, 337-354.
28. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
29. Walldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990's: Extending the agenda for the 21st century. Communication Yearbook, 24, 207-229.
30. Williams, S., Ogletree, S., Woodburn, W., & Raffeld, P. (1993). Gender roles, computer attitudes, and dyadic computer interaction performance in college students. Sex Roles, 29, 515-524.
31. Wood, A. F., & Fassett, D. L. (2003). Remote control: Identity, power, and technology in the communication classroom. Communication Education, 52, 286-296.