Identification of and adaptation to students' preinstructional beliefs in introductory communication research methods: Contributions of interactive web technology

Communication Education

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 189-205

  Jackson, Sally ^a   Wolski, Stacy ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Argumentation; On line learning protocols; Prior beliefs; Science instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035627063     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520109379247     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of social research, 8th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 1-40.
3. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
4. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11.
6. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117-159.
7. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.
8. Jackson, S. (1998). Beyond web course automation: Designing online dialogues. NAUWeb98 Conference, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ. [Online June 2000: http://star.ucc.nau.edu/~nauweb98/papers/jackson.html]
9. Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1980). Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66, 251-265.
10. Jackson, S. A., & Madison, C. (1999). Instruction by design: Technology in the discourse of teaching and learning. In A. L. Vangelisti, J. A. Daly, & G. W. Friedrich (Eds.), Teaching communication: Theory, research and methods, 2nd ed. (pp. 393-408). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Jackson, S., Wolski, S., Bonito, J., & Polcar, L. (1999). Disciplining commonsense explanations of communication with structured online dialogues. In D. G. Brown (Ed.), Interactive learning: Vignettes from America's most wired campuses. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
12. Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (1989). Building a model of conversational argument. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O'Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 2: Paradigm exemplars (pp. 153-171). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Nissani, M. (1997). Can the persistence of misconceptions be generalized and explained? Journal of Thought, 32, 69-76.
15. O'Keefe, B. J. (1988). The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication Monographs, 55, 80-103.
16. O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Pea, R. D. (1993). Learning scientific concepts through material and social activities: Conversational analysis meets conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 28, 265-277.
18. Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: U. of Alabama.