Loss of sound tooth structure when replacing amalgam restorations by adhesive inlays

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 327-331

  Moscovich, H ^a   Creugers, N H J ^a   De Kanter, R J A M ^a   Roeters, F J M ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Cariology and Endodontology ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY;

ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; RETREATMENT;

DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; INLAYS; MOLAR; RETREATMENT;

EID: 0032214963     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ATTIN T, VATASCHKI M & HELLWIG E (1996) Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials Quintessence International 27 203-209.
2. BURKE FJT, WILSON NHF & WATTS DC (1993) The effect of cavity wall taper on fracture resistance of teeth restored with resin composite inlays Operative Dentistry 18 230-236.
3. ELDERTON RJ (1979) A new look at cavity preparation Proceedings of the British Paedodontic Society 9 25-30.
4. GARBER DA & GOLDSTEIN RE (1994) Porcelain and Composite Inlays and Onlays: Esthetic Posterior Restorations Chicago: Quintessence Pub Co, p 41.
5. HUNTER AR, TREASURE ET & HUNTER AJ (1995) Increase in cavity volume associated with the removal of class 2 amalgam and composite restorations Operative Dentistry 20 2-6.
6. LARSON TD, DOUGLAS WH & GEISTFELD RE (1981) Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth Operative Dentistry 6 2-5.
7. McKINNEY JE, ANTONUCCI JM & RUPP NW (1987) Wear and microhardness of glass-ionomer cements Journal of Dental Research 66 1134-1139.
8. MILLAR BJ, ROBINSON PB & DAVIES BR (1992) Effects of the removal of composite resin restorations on Class II cavities British Dental Journal 173 210-212.
9. MILLEDING P, ÖRTENGREN U & KARLSSON S (1995) Ceramic inlay systems: some clinical aspects Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 22 571-580.
10. MOSCOVICH H, ROETERS FJ, VERDONSCHOT N, DE KANTER RJ & CREUGERS NH (1998) Effect of composite basing on the resistance to bulk fracture of industrial porcelain inlays Journal of Dentistry 26 183-189.
11. ORAM DA & PEARSON GJ (1994) A survey of current practice into the use of aesthetic inlays British Dental Journal 176 457-462.
12. PITT FORD TR (1985) The Restoration of Teeth Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, Chapter 8.
13. REID JS, SAUNDERS WP & BAIDAS KM (1993) Marginal fit and microleakage of indirect inlay systems American Journal of Dentistry 6 81-84.
14. REINHARDT JW, SWIFT EJ Jr & BOLDEN AJ (1993) A national survey on the use of glass-ionomer cements Operative Dentistry 18 56-60.
15. ROULET JF & HERDER S (1990) Bonded Ceramic Inlays Chicago: Quintessence Pub Co, p 34.
16. WASSELL RW, WALLS AW & McCABE JF (1992) Cavity convergence angles for direct composite inlays Journal of Dentistry 20 294-297.
17. WATTS DC, WILSON NH & BURKE FJ (1995) Indirect composite preparation width and depth and tooth fracture resistance American Journal of Dentistry 8 15-19.
18. YAMADA T, ASANO M, TAKAINIZU M & KOHNO A (1997) Adaptability of glass-ceramic inlays: effects of taper and surface roughness Journal of Dental Research 76 Abstracts of Papers p 192 Abstract 1432.