Innovative integration of technology in an undergraduate history course

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 546-565

  Milman, Natalie B ^a   Heinecke, Walter E ^b  

^a Northern Virginia Graduate Center   (United States)

^b Curry School of Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993097843     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2000.10505923     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ayers, E. L., & Thomas, W. G. (1998). Teaching with technology initiative: Final report. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
2. Barr, R. B„ & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning, a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(9), 12-25.
3. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Bolster, A. S., Jr. (1983, August). Toward a more effective model of research on teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 294-308.
5. Brownfield, P., Hwang, J., Picou, D., & Santarelli, A. (1998, May). Bureau of refugees, freed-men, and abandoned lands. Retrieved July 20, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http.//jefferson.village.virginia.edu/vshadow2/HIUS403/freedmen/bureau.html
6. Cooper, J. M., & Bull, G. L., (1997). Technology and teacher education: Past practice and recommended directions. Action in Teacher Education, 19(2), 97-106.
7. Crocker, E., McMurphy, K., Tran, H., & Doshi, R. (1998, May). War comes home: Chambersburg, summer of 1864. Retrieved July 20, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/vshadow2/HrUS403/frhome/home.html
8. Denzin, N. K. (1992). Symbolic Interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
10. Freed, D., Richardson, S., Kelly, M., & Sensoy, C. (1998, May). Civil War writings. Retrieved July 20, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/vshadow2/HIUS403/ letters/home.html
11. Green, K. C. (1999, October). The 1999 national survey of information technology in U.S. higher education: The continuing challenge of instructional integration and user support. The Campus Computing Project. Retrieved July 20, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.campuscomputing.net/pdf/1999-CCP.pdf
12. International Society for Technology in Education. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a Digital Age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology. Retrieved July 20, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.mff.org/edtech/publication.taf?_function=detail&Content_uidl =154
13. Kovalchick, A. (1999). A grounded theory of post-secondary faculty design of technology-based instruction as institutional innovation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
14. Martorella, P. H. (1997).Technology and the social studies-or which way to the sleeping giant? Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(4), 511-514.
15. McMichael, A. (1998, February). The historian, the Internet, and the Web: A reassessment. Perspectives, 36(2), 29-32.
16. McPherson, J. M. (1997). For cause and comrades: Why men fought in the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Fra n-cisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (1997). Technology and the new professional teacher: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Washington, D.C.: Author.
19. Perkins, D. N. (1992). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 45-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Person, R. (1994). Organizational structure at the crossroads. Educational Record, 75, 4246.
21. Privateer, P. M. (1999). Academic technology and the future of higher education: Strategic paths taken and not taken. Journal of Higher Education, 70(1), 60-79.
22. Rose, S. A., & Fernlund, P. M. (1997). Using technology for powerful social studies learning. Social Education, 61(3), 160-166.
23. Shea, C. (1998, March 20). Taking aim at the 'Ken Burns’ view of the Civil War: Edward Ayers arrives at his revisionist argument by using the web and focusing on 2 counties. Retrieved March 31, 1998 from the World Wide Web: http://www.chronicle.com
24. Trinkle, D. (1999, April). History and the computer revolutions: A survey of current practices. Journal of the Association for History and Computing 2 (1). Retrieved July 18, 2000 from the World Wide Web:http://www.mcel.pacificu.edu/JAHC/JAHCIIl/ARTICLESII1/Trinkle/Trinkleindex.html