Student engagement with social issues in a multimedia-supported learning environment?

Theory and Research in Social Education

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 472-504

  Saye, John W ^a   Brush, Thomas ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000870287     PISSN: 00933104     EISSN: 21631654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.1999.10505891     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Berson, M. J. (1996). Effectiveness of computer technology in the social studies: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 486-499.
2. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. B. (1993). The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
5. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 65-80.
8. Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught. New York: Longmans.
9. Denzin, N. (1978). The logic of naturalistic inquiry. In N. Denzin (Ed.), Sociological methods: A sourcebook (pp. 6-28). New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
11. Doyle, W., & Ponder, G. (1977-1978). The practicality ethic in teacher decision-making. Interchange, 8(3), 1-12.
12. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we’ve learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
13. Ehman, L. H., Glenn, A. D., Johnson, V., & White, C. S. (1998). Using computer databases in student problem solving. In J. A. Braun, P. Femlund, & C. S. White (Eds.), Technology tools in the social studies curriculum (pp. 164-187). Wilsonville, OR: Frankilin, Beedle.
14. Engle, S. (1960). Decision making: The heart of social studies instruction. Social Education, 24(6), 301-304, 306.
15. Evans, R. W., & Saxe, D. W. (1988). Handbook on teaching social issues. Washington: National Council for the Social Studies.
16. Gitlin, A. D. (1990). Educative research, voice, and school change. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 443-466.
17. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
18. Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Gordon, R. (1998). Balancing real-world problems with real world results. Phi Delta Kappan, 27(1), 390-393.
21. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1998). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. II). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Hunt, M. P., & Metcalf, L. E. (1968). Teaching high school social studies: Problems in reflective thinking and understanding. New York: Harper & Row.
23. Jacobsen, M., J., Maouiri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1996). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(3/4), 239-281.
24. Kagan, D. M. (1993). Laura and Jim and what they taught me about the gap between educational theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
25. Kinzie, M., & Sullivan, H. (1989). Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 5-14.
26. Leming, J. S. (1994). Why social studies teachers can’t teach Johnny/Susan to think: An epistemic development perspective. Paper presented at annual meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies. Phoenix, AZ.
27. Martin, L. (1987). Teachers’ adoption of multimedia technologies for science and mathematics instruction. In R. Pea & K. Sheingold (Eds.), Mirrors of minds: Patterns of experience in educational computing (pp. 35-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. McKee, S. J. (1988). Impediments to implementing critical thinking. Social Education, 52(6), 444-446.
29. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Newmann, F. M. (1990). A test of higher-order thinking in social studies: Persuasive writing on constitutional issues using the NAEP approach. Social Education, 54(6), 369.
31. Newmann, F. M. (1991a). Higher order thinking in the teaching of social studies: Connections between theory and practice. In J. Voss, D. Perkins, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 381-400). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Newmann, F. M. (1991b). Classroom thoughtfulness and students’ higher order thinking: Common indicators and diverse social studies courses. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(4), 410-433.
33. Newmann, F. M. (1991c). Promoting higher order thinking in social studies: Overview of a study of sixteen high school departments. Theory and Research in Social Education, 29(4), 324-340.
34. Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Oliver, D., & Shaver, J. P. (1966). Teaching public issues in the high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36. Onosko, J. (1991). Barriers to the promotion of higher order thinking in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(4), 341-366.
37. Parker, W. C., Mueller, M., & Wendling, L. (1989). Critical reasoning on civic issues. Theory and Research in Social Education, 29(4), 7-32.
38. Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Perfetti, C. A., Britt, M. A., Dyke, J. V., & Gabrys, G. (1999). The source/s apprentice: A program of research and development in history instruction. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
40. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20.
41. Ringstaff, C., Sandholtz, J., & Dwyer, D. (1991). Trading places: When teachers utilize student expertise in technology-intensive classrooms. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
42. Rossi, J. A. (1995). In-depth study in an issues-centered social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education, 23(2), 87-120.
43. Rossi, J. A., & Pace, C. M. (1998). Issues-centered instruction with low achieving high school students: The dilemmas of two teachers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26(3), 380-409.
44. Saye, J. W. (1997). Technology and educational empowerment: Students’ perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 5-26.
45. Saye, J. W. (1998a). Creating time to develop student thinking: Team-teaching with technology as an instructional partner. Social Education, 62(6), 356-362.
46. Saye, J. W. (1998b). Technology in the classroom: The role of dispostions in teacher gatekeeping. Journal of Curriculum & Supervision, 13(3), 210-234.
47. Scheurman, G., & Newmann, F. M. (1998). Authentic intellectual work in social studies: putting performance before pedagogy. Social Education, 62(1), 21-35.
48. Shulman, L. S., & Carey, N. B. (1984). Psychology and the limitations of individual rationality: Implications for the study of reasoning and civility. Review of Educational Research, 54, 501-524.
49. Shaver, J. P., Davis, O. L., & Helburn, S. W. (1979). The status of social studies education: Impressions from three NSF studies. Social Education, 4(3), 150-153.
50. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational: Mathematical essays. New York: Wiley.
51. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Spoehr, K., & Spoehr, L. (1994). Learning to think historically. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 71-77.
53. Stevenson, R. B. (1990). Engagement and cognitive challenge in thoughtful social studies classes: A study of student perspectives, journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(4), 329-341.
54. Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237-284). New York: Macmillan.
55. VanSickle, R. L., & Hoge, J. D. (1991). Higher cognitive thinking skills in social studies: Concepts and critiques. Theory and Research in Social Education, 19(2), 152-172.
56. VanSickle, R. L. (1991). The role of student motivation in higher ognitive thought in social studies classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the College and University Faculty Assembly of the National Council for the Social Studies, Washington, D. C.
57. Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T. A., & Penner, B. C. (1983). Problem solving skill in the social sciences. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. New York: Academic.
58. Wilson, B., Hamilton, R., Teslow, J., & Cyr, T. (1994). Technology making a difference: The Parkview Elementary School study. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.
59. Wiggins, G. (1998). An exchange of views on "Semantics, pychometrics, and assessment reform: A close look at ’Authentic’ assessments". Educational Researcher, 27(6), 20-21.
60. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73-87