Minimally invasive navigated knee surgery: An American perspective

Orthopedics

Volumn 28, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  Stulberg, S David ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FRACTURE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE SURGERY; LIMB DEFORMITY; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATION; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; SKIN DEFECT; SKIN INCISION; SOFT TISSUE INJURY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE JOINT; PATIENT SELECTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 27744448303     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aldinger PR, Clarius M, Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, Breusch SJ. [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the Oxford Uni: meniscal bearing knee]. Orthopade. 2004; 33:1277-1283.
2. Argenson JN, Flecher X. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2004; 11:341-347.
3. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH. Rapid recovery protocol for peri-operative care of total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. Surg Technol Int. 2004; 13:239-247.
4. Bohler M, Messner M, Glos W, Riegler ML. Computer navigated implantation of total knee prostheses: radiological study. Acta Chir Aust. 2000; 33(Suppl):63.
5. Bonutti PM, Neal DJ, Kester MA. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg technique. Orthopedics. 2003; 26:899-903.
6. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, Ragland PS, Kester M. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(Suppl):26-32.
7. Emerson RH JR, Higgins LL. A comparison of highly instrumented and minimally instrumented unicompartmental knee prostheses. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:153-157.
8. Fisher DA, Watts M, Davis KE. Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(7 Suppl 1):2-8.
9. Fuchs S, Rolauffs B, Plaumann T, Tibesku CO, Rosenbaum D. Clinical and functional results after the rehabilitation period in minimally-invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005; 13:179-186.
10. Gesell MW, Tria AJ Jr. MIS unicondylar knee arthroplasty: surgical approach and early results. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:53-60.
11. Goble EM, Justin DF. Minimally invasive total knee replacement: principles and technique. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35:253-245.
12. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:68-73.
13. Jahromi I, Walton NP, Dobson PJ, Lewis PL, Campbell DG. Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision. Int Orthop. 2004; 28:286-289.
14. Konig DP, Popken F, Herzberg W, Evsel P. The minimally invasive unicompartmental knee system "Preservation" First clinical results and analysis of complications [in German]. Orthopade. 2004; 33:1284-1289.
15. Laskin RS. Minimally invasive total knee replacemnt using a mini-midvastus incision technique and results. Surg Technol Int. 2004; 13:231-238.
16. Laskin RS, Besac B, Phongiunakorn A, et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:74-81.
17. Meek RM, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35:191-200.
18. Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, et al. Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19:296-301.
19. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, et al. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system. Int Orthop. 2004; 28:193-197.
20. Rees JL, Price AJ. Beard DJ, Dodd CA, Murray DW. Minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional results at 1 year and the effect of surgical inexperience. Knee. 2004; 11:363-367.
21. Repicci JA. Mini-invasive knee unicompartmental arthroplasty: bone-sparing technique. Surg Technol Int. 2003; 11:282-286.
22. Repicci JA, Hartman JF. Minimally invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: an outpatient arthritic bypass procedure. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35:210-216.
23. Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Caneci C. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:61-67.
24. Tria AJ Jr. Advancements in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2003; 26(8 Suppl):859-863.
25. Tria AJ Jr. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004; 35:227-234.
26. Tria AJ Jr, Coon TM. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop. 2003; 416:185-190.
27. Vail TP. Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004; 428:51-52.
28. Yang KY, Wang MC, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty-early results of a matched-pair comparison. Singapore Med J. 2003; 44:559-562.
29. Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Stress fracture of the medial tibial plateau after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a report of 2 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18:801-803.
30. American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. "Minimally Invasive and Small Incision Joint Replacement Surgery: What Surgeons Should Consider" [brochure]. May 2005.
31. American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. "Minimally Invasive and Incision Joint Replacement Surgery: What Patients Should Consider" [brochure]. June 2005.
32. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, et al. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop. 2002; 404:7-13.
33. Bathis H, Perlick L, Luring C, Kalteis T, Grifka J. CT-based and CT-free navigation in knee prosthesis implantation. Results of a prospective study [in German]. Unfallchirurg. 2003; 106:935-940.
34. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, et al. Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004; 28:87-90.
35. Briard JL, Stindel E, Plaweski S, et al. CT free navigation with the LCS surgetics station: A new way of balancing the soft tissues in TKA based on bone morphing. In: Steihl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004. 274-280.
36. Clemens U, Konermann WH, Kohler S, et al. Computer-assisted navigation with the OrthoPilot system using the search evolution TKA prosthesis. In: Steihl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004: 236-241.
37. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, Picard F, Leitner F. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1998; 354:49-56.
38. Fadda M, Bertelli D, Martelli S, et al. Computer assisted planning for total knee arthroplasty: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Virtual Reality and Robotics in Medicine and Medial Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Grenoble, France. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1997:619-628.
39. Fuiko R, Kotten B, Zettl R, Ritschl P. The accuracy of palpation from orientation points for the navigated implantation of knee prostheses [in German]. Orthopade. 2004; 33:338-343.
40. Garg A, Walker PS. Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer graphics model. J Biochem. 1990; 23:45-58.
41. Hart R, Janecek M, Chaker A, Bucek P. Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation. Int Orthop. 2003; 27:366-369.
42. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted total knee prosthesis implantation without preoperative imaging. A comparison with classical instrumentation. Presented at the Fourth Annual North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; 2000; Pittsburgh, PA.
43. Konermann WH, Sauer MA. Postoperative alignment of conventional and navigated total knee arthoplasty. In: Steihl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004:219-225.
44. Krackow KA, Bayers-Thering M, Phillips MJ, Bayers-Thering M, Mihalko WM. A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1999;22:698-701.
45. Lampe F, Hille E. Navigated implantation of the Columbus total knee arthroplasty with the OrthoPilot System: Version 4.0. In: Steihl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004:248-253.
46. Matsen FA, Garbini JL, Sidles JA. Robotic assistance in orthopaedic surgery. A proof of principle using distal femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993; 296:178-186.
47. Mattes T, Puhl W. Navigation in TKA with the Navitrack System. In: Steild JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag; 2004:293-300.
48. Miehlke RK, Clemens U, Jens J-H, Kershally S. Navigation in knee arthroplasty: preliminary clinical experience and prospective comparative study in comparison with conventional technique. Orthoop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2001; 139:1109-1129.
49. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Ikai M, et al Accuracy evaluation of a shape-based registration method for a computer navigation system for total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2003; 16:98-105.
50. Nizard R. Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002; 68:215-230. Review.
51. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Grifka J. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004; 75:464-470.
52. Picard F, Moody JE, DiGioia AM, et al. Knee reconstructive surgery: preoperative model system. In: DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Picard R, Nolte PL, eds. Computer and Robotic Assisted Knee and Hip Surgery. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ Press; 2004:139-156.
53. Saragaglia D, Picard, F. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee endoprosthesis with no pre-operative imaging: the Kinematic Model. In: Steild JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Vertag; 2004:226-233.
54. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure: results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001; 87:215-220.
55. Sati M, Staubli HU, Bourquin Y, Kunz M, Nolte LP. CRA hip and knee reconstructive surgery: ligament reconstructions in the knee-intra-operative model system (non-image based). In: DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Picard R, Nolte PL, eds. Computer and Robotic Assisted Knee and Hip Surgery. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ Press; 2004:235-256.
56. Sparmann M, Wolke B. Knee endoprosthesis navigation with the Stryker system. In: Steihl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004:319-323.
57. Stindel E, Briard JL, Merloz P, et al. Bone morphing: 3D morphological data for total knee arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg. 2002; 7:156-168.
58. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, et al. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004; 426:180-186.
59. Stulberg SD, Koyonos L, McClusker S, Granieri M. Factors affecting the accuracy of minimally invasive TKA. Presented at: Annual Meeting of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2005; Washington, DC.
60. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(Suppl):90-98.
61. Stulberg SD, Picard F, Saragaglia D. Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty. Operative techniques. Orthopaedics. 2000; 10:25-39.
62. Stulberg SD, Sarin V. The use of a navigation system to assist ligament balancing in TKR. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual American CAOS Meeting; July 2001; Pittsburgh, PA.
63. Stulberg SD, Saragaglia D, Miehlke R. Total knee replacement: navigation technique intra-operative model system. In: DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Picard R, Nolte PL, eds. Computer and Robotic Assisted Knee and Hip Surgery. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ Press; 2004:157-178.
64. Stulberg S, Sarin V, Loan P. The use of computer assisted navigation in TKR: results of an initial experience in 35 patients, Presented at: North American Program on Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery; July 6-8, 2001; Pittsburgh, PA.
65. Wiese M, Rosenthal A, Bernsmann K. Clinical experience using the SurgiGATE system. In: Steihl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2004:400-404.