Minimally Invasive Unicondylar Versus Total Condylar Knee Arthroplasty - Early Results of a Matched-Pair Comparison

Singapore Medical Journal

Volumn 44, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 559-562

  Yang, Kuang Ying ^a   Wang, M C ^a   Yeo, S J ^a   Lo, N N ^a  

^a SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT MOBILITY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOBILIZATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1642471729     PISSN: 00375675     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knec Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: An update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72(5):503-13.
2. Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978; 60(2):182-5.
3. Bernasek TL, Rand JA, Bryan RS. Unicompartmental porous coated anatomic total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; 236:52-9.
4. Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A. Polyethylene wear of the PCA unicompartmental knee. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63(3):260-2.
5. Swienckowski J, Page BJ. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee - Use of the L-cut and comparison with the tibial inset method. Clin Orthop 1989; 239:161-7.
6. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop 1999; 367:50-60.
7. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(6):983-9.
8. Bengtson S, Knutson K. The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1991; 62(4):301-11.
9. Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn 1968; Supp 277:7-72.
10. Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F Jr, Elting J, Stiehl J. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1996; 331:87-92.
11. Rinonapoli E, Mancini GB, Corvaglia A, Musiello S. Tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: A 10- to 21-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop 1998; 353:185-93.
12. Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop 1991; 273:157-64.
13. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Resenberg AG, Galante JO. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop 1999; 367:50-60.
14. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah N. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective randomized trial of 102 ostcoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(5):862-5.
15. Jefferson RJ, Whittle MW. Functional biomechanical results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total condylar arthroplasty and tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72(1):161-2.
16. Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: A comparative study. Clin. Orthop 1991; 273:151-6.
17. Cobb AG, Kozinn SC, Scott RD. Unicondylar or total knee replacement: the patient's preference. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72(1):166.
18. Levine WN, Ozuna RM, Scott RD, et al. Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11:797-801.
19. Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70(2):170-5.