Now You See It; Now You Don't: Inhibiting Recall and Recognition of Scenes

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 471-482

  Wright, Daniel B ^a   Loftus, Elizabeth F ^b   Hall, Melanie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141437148     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.719     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson MC, Bjork RA, Bjork EL. 1994. Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20: 1063-1087.
2. Anderson MC, Spellman BA. 1995. On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review 102: 68-100.
3. Ayers MS, Reder LM. 1998. A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5: 1-21.
4. Brainerd CJ, Reyna VF. 1998. Fuzzy-trace theory and children's false memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 71: 81-129.
5. Cohen J. 1977. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Revised edn). Academic Press: London.
6. Garry M, Manning CG, Loftus EF, Sherman SJ. 1996. Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 3: 208-214.
7. Hyman IE Jr, Husband TH, Billings FJ. 1995. False memories of childhood experiences. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9: 181-195.
8. Johnson MK. 1997. Source monitoring and memory distortion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society - Series B 352: 1733-1745.
9. Loftus EF. 1993. The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist 48: 518-537.
10. Loftus EF. 1997. Creating false memories. Scientific American 277: September, 70-75.
11. Loftus EF, Miller DG, Burns HJ. 1978. Semantic integration of verbal information into visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4: 19-31.
12. Loftus EF, Pickrell JE. 1995. The formation of false memories. Psychiatric Annals 25: 720-725.
13. Loftus EF, Polonsky S, Fullilove MT. 1994. Memories of childhood sexual abuse: Remembering and repressing. Psychology of Women Quarterly 18: 67-84.
14. Macrae CN, MacLeod MD. 1999. On recollections lost: When practice makes imperfect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 463-473.
15. Neisser U. 1986. Nested structure of autobiographical memory. In Autobiographical Memory, Rubin DC (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 71-81.
16. Pezdek K, Roe C. 1997. The suggestibility of children's memory for being touched: Planting, erasing, and changing memories. Law and Human Behavior 21: 95-106.
17. Read JD. 1996. From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 3: 105-111.
18. Roediger HL, McDermott KB. 1995. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 21: 803-814.
19. Schank RC. 1982. Dynamic Memory: A theory of learning in computers and people. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
20. Schank RC, Abelson RP. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
21. Shaw JS, Bjork RA, Handal A. 1995. Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2: 249-253.
22. Williams LM. 1994. Recall of childhood trauma: A prospective study of women's memories of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62: 1167-1176.
23. Wright DB, Davies GM. 1999. Eyewitness testimony. In Handbook of Applied Cognition, Durso FT, Nickerson RS, Schvaneveldt RW, Dumnis ST, Lindsay DS, Chi TH (eds). John Wiley: New York; 789-818.
24. Wright DB, Self G, Justice C. 2000. Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology 91: 189-202.