Eyewitness testimony and the Oklahoma bombing

Psychologist

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 292-295

  Memon, Amina ^a   Wright, Daniel B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033148039     PISSN: 09528229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ackil, J.K. & Zaragoza, M. (1995). Developmental differences in eyewitness suggestibility and memory for source. Journal of Experimental Child fcycholojy, 60, 57-83.
2. Allen, B.P. & Lindsay, D.D. (1998). Amalgamations of memories: Intrusions of information from one event into reports of another. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 277-285.
3. Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L.M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activationbased memory model. Psyehonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 1-21.
4. Brainerd, C. & Poole, D. (1997). Long term survival of children's false memories: A review, Learning and Individual Differences, 9, 125-152.
5. Christianson, S. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309.
6. Cutshall, J.L. & Yuille, J. (1989). Field studies of eyewitness memories of actual crimes. In D.C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence. New York: Springer.
7. Flin, R. H. & Shepherd, J.W. (1986). Tall stories: Eyewitnesses' ability to estimate height and weight characteristics. Human Learning, 5, 29-38.
8. Garry, M., Manning, C., Loftus, E.F. & Sherman, S. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 208-214.
9. Gorenstein, G.W. & Ellsworth, P. (1980). Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a later identification by an eyewitness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 616-622.
10. Johnson, K. (1996). John Doe enigma may help McVeigh, Nichols. USA Today, 18 April. Accessed 7 June 1998 on www.usatoday.com/news/index/fx58.htm.
11. Kebbel, M. & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers' perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 232-330.
12. Lindsay, D.S., Read, J.D. & Sharma, K. (1998).Accuracy and confidence in person identrfication:The relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely. Psychological Science, 9, 215-218.
13. Lindsay, R. (in press). Eyewitness evidence. In G. Chayko (Ed.), forensic Evidence in Canada, 2nd edn. Canada Law Book.
14. Memon, A., Vrij, A. & Bull, R. (1998). Psychology &Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility of Victims, Witnesses and Suspects. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
15. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Ross, D.F., Ceci, S.J., Dunning, D. & Toglia, M.P. (1994). Unconscious transference and line-up identification:Toward a memory blending approach. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read & M.P. Toglia (Eds), Adult Eyewitness Testimony: Current Trends and Developments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Sporer, S.L. (1996). Psychological aspects of person descriptors. In S.L Sporer, R.S. Malpass & G. Kohnken (Eds), Psychological Issues in Eyewitness Identification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Sporer, S.L., Penrod, S., Read, J.D. & Cutler, B.L. ( 1995). Choosing, confidence and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
19. United States v McVeigh (1997) 119 F.3d 806 (10th Cir.).
20. United States v Nichols (1998) 96-CR-68.
21. Wells, G.L. & Bradfield, A.L. (1998). 'Good, you identified the suspect': Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 360-376.
22. Wright, D.B. & Davies, G.M. (1999). Eyewitness testimony. In F.T. Durso, R.S. Nickerson, R.W. Schvaneveldt, S.T. Dumais, D.S. Lindsay & M.T.H. Chi (Eds), Hondbook of Applied Cognition. Chichester: Wiley.
23. Wright, D.B. & Self, G. (in preparation). Memory conformity and cars: The impact of accurate and inaccurate postevent information. (Paper available from D.B.Wright, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol.)
24. Wright, D.B. & Stroud, J. (1998). Memory quality and misinformation for peripheral and central objects, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 273-286.
25. Zaragoza, M.S. & Lane, S.M. (1998). Processing resources and eyewitness suggestibility. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 305-320.
26. Zaragoza, M.S. & Mitchell, K.J. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories. Psychological Science, 7, 294-300.