Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 465-487

  Salmivalli, Christina ^a   Kaukiainen, Ari ^a   Voeten, Marinus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STUDENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGGRESSION; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; DOMINANCE-SUBORDINATION; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STUDENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27644466572     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000709905X26011     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Boulton, M., Bucci, E., & Hawker, D. (1999). Swedish and English secondary school pupils' attitudes towards, and conceptions of, bullying: Concurrent links with bully/victim involvement. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 277-284.
2. Carvajal, S. C., Baumler, E., Harrist, R. B., & Parcel, G. S. (2001). Multilevel models and unbiased tests for group based interventions: Examples from the Safer Choices Study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 185-205.
3. Cook, Th. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing.
4. Cowie, H., & Sharp, S. (1994). Tackling bullying trough the curriculum. In P. K. Smith & S. Sharp (Eds), School bullying. Insights and perspectives (pp. 84-107). London: Routledge.
5. Denham, S., & Holt, A. (1993). Preschoolers' likability as cause or consequence of their social behavior. Developmental Psychology, 29, 271-275.
6. Desbiens, N., Royer, E., Fortin, L., & Bertrand, R. (1998). Social competence, social status and social affiliations of students with behavior problems: Implications for school intervention/-Competence sociale, statut sociometrique et reseaux affiliatifs des eleves en trouble du comportement: Persepctives d'intervention a l'ecole. Science et Comportement, 26, 107-127.
7. Eslea, M., & Smith, P. K. (1999). The long-term effectiveness of anti-bullying work in primary schools. Educational Research, 40, 203-218.
8. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.). London: Arnold [also available at http://www.arnoldpublishers.com/support/goldstein.htm] .
9. Hawker, D., & Boulton, M. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441-455.
10. Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (Eds.). (2001). Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. New York: Guilford Press.
11. Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. New York: Guilford Press.
12. Lemerise, E., Harper, B., & Howes, H. (1998). The transition from kindergarten to ungraded primary: Longitudinal predictors of popularity and social reputation. Early Education and Development, 9, 187-201.
13. Ljungström, K. (1990). Mobbning i skolan. Ett kompendium om mobbning samt on mobbningbehandling enligt Farstametoden. Stockholm: Ordkällan/Pedaktiv.
14. Ma, X. (2001). Bullying and being bullied: To what extent are bullies also victims? American Educational Research Journal, 38, 351-370.
15. Ma, X. (2002). Bullying in middle school: Individual and school characteristics of victims and offenders. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 63-89.
16. Maines, B., & Robinson, G. (1998). The no blame approach to bullying. In D. Shorrocks-Taylor (Ed.), Direction in eduactional psychology. London: Whurr Publication.
17. Menesini, E., Eslea, M., Smith, P. K., Genta, M. L., Giannetti, E., Fonzi, A., & Costabile, A. (1997). Cross-national comparison of children's attitudes towards bully/victim problems in school. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 245-257.
18. Mooij, T. (1998). Pupil-class determinants of aggressive and victim behavior in pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 373-385.
19. Mooij, T. (1999a). Promoting prosocial pupil behavior: 1-A multilevel theoretical model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 469-478.
20. Mooij, T. (1999b). Promoting prosocial pupil behavior: 2-Secondary school intervention and pupil effects. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 479-504.
21. Munthe, E. (1989). Bullying in Scandinavia. In E. Roland & E. Munthe (Eds.), Bullying: An international perspective (pp. 66-78). London: David Fulton.
22. Olweus, D. (1973). Hackkycklingar och översittare: Forskning om skolmobbning. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
23. Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In D. Pepler & K. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-448). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. New York: Guilford Press.
25. Olweus, D., & Alsaker, F. (1991). Assessing change in a cohort-longitudinal study with hierarchical data. In D. Magnusson, L. Bergman, G. Rudinger & B. Törestad (Eds.), Problems and methods in longitudinal research: Stability and change (pp. 107-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Ortega, R., & Lera, M. -J. (2000). The Seville anti-bullying project. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 113-123.
27. Pepler, D., Craig, W., Ziegler, S., & Charach, A. (1994). An evaluation of an anti-bullying intervention in Toronto schools. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 13, 95-110.
28. Pepler, D., Smith, P. K., Rigby K. (2004). Looking back and looking forward: Implications for making interventions work effectively. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Pikas, A. (1975). Så stoppar vi mobbning. Stockholm: Prisma.
30. Pikas, A. (2002). New developments of the shared concern model. School Psychology International, 23, 307-326.
31. Plewis, I. (2002). Modelling impact heterogeneity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 165, 31-38.
32. Plewis, I., & Hurry, J. (1998). A multilevel perspective on the design and analysis of intervention studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4, 13-26.
33. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
34. Rigby, K., & Slee, P. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes towards victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615-627.
35. Roland, E. (1993). Bullying: A developing tradition of research and management. Understanding and managing bullying (pp. 15-30). Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
36. Salmivalli, C. (1998). Intelligent, attractive, well-behaving, unhappy: The structure of adolescents' self-concept and its relations to their social behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8, 333-354.
37. Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 453-459.
38. Salmivalli, C. (2001a). Peer-led intervention campaign against bullying. Who considered it useful, who benefited? Educational Research, 43, 263-278.
39. Salmivalli, C. (2001b). Group view on victimization - empirical findings and their implications. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 398-419).
40. Salmivalli, C. (2002). Is there an age decline in victimization by peers at school? Educational Research, 44, 237-245.
41. Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., Voeten, M., & Sinisammal, M. (2004). Targeting the group as a whole: The Finnish anti-bullying intervention. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler & K. Rigby (Eds.), School bullying: How effective can interventions be? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.
43. Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behavior in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246-258.
44. Sharp, S., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Tackling bullying in your school. In S. Sharp & P. K. Smith (Eds.), London: Routledge.
45. Sharp, S., & Thompson, D. (1994). The role of whole-school policies in tackling bullying behavior in schools. In P. Smith & S. Sharp (Eds.), School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge.
46. Smith, P. K., Ananiadou, K., & Cowie, H. (2003). Interventions to reduce school bullying. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 295-303.
47. Smith, P. K., & Brain, P. (2000). Bullying in schools: Lessons from two decades of research. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 1-9.
48. Smith, P. K., Madsen, K., & Moody, J. (1999a). What causes the age decline in reports of being bullied at school? Towards a developmental analysis of risks of being bullied. Educational Research, 41, 267-285.
49. Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tass, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. & Slee, P. (Eds.). (1999b). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York: Routledge.
50. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
51. Stevens, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Van Oost, P. (2000). Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of anti-bullying intervention in primary and secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 195-210.
52. Stevens, V., Van Oost, P., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2000). The effects of an anti-bullying intervention programme on peers' attitudes and behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 21-34.
53. Stevens, V., Van Oost, P., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2001). Implementation of the Flemish antibullying intervention and relation with program effectiveness. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 303-317.
54. Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97-111.
55. Whitney, I., Rivers, I., Smith, P. K., & Sharp, S. (1994). The Sheffield project: Methodology and findings. In P. K. Smith & S. Sharp (Eds.), School bullying: Insights and perspectives (pp. 20-56). London: Routledge.