Targeting the group as a whole: The Finnish anti-bullying intervention

Bullying in Schools: How Successful Can Interventions Be

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 251-274

  Salmivalli, Christina ^a   Kaukiainen, Ari ^a   Voeten, Marinus ^b   Sinisammal, Mirva ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Educational Sciences University of Nijmegen ^*  (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645760268     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511584466.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Cowie, H. and Sharp, S. (1994). Tackling bullying through the curriculum. In P. K. Smith and S. Sharp (eds.) School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 84-107.
2. Eslea, M. and Smith, P. K. (1999). The long-term effectiveness of anti-bullying work in primary schools. Educational Research, 40, 203-18.
3. Hazler, R., Miller, D., Carney, J., and Green, S. (2001). Adult recognition of school bullying situations. Educational Research, 43, 133-46.
4. Lee, V. L. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125-41.
5. Ljungström, K. (1990). Mobbning i skolan. Ett kompendium om mobbning samt on mobbningbehandling enligt Farstametoden. Stockholm: Ordkällan/Pedaktiv.
6. Menesini, E., Eslea, M., Smith, P. K., Genta, M. L., Giannetti, E., Fonzi, A., and Costabile, A. (1997). Cross-national comparison of children’s attitudes towards bully/victim problems in school. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 245-57.
7. Mooij, T. (1999a). Promoting prosocial pupil behaviour: 1-A multilevel theoretical model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 469-78.
8. Mooij, T. (1999b). Promoting prosocial pupil behaviour: 2-Secondary school intervention and pupil effects. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 479-504.
9. O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., and Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437-52.
10. Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In D. Pepler and K. Rubin (eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 411-48.
11. Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen and S. Graham (eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 3-20.
12. Olweus, D. and Alsaker, F. (1991). Assessing change in a cohort-longitudinal study with hierarchical data. In D. Magnusson, L. Bergman, G. Rudinger, and B. Törestad (eds.), Problems and methods in longitudinal research: Stability and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-32.
13. Pepler, D., Craig, W., Ziegler, S., and Charach, A. (1994). An evaluation of an anti-bullying intervention in Toronto schools. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health (Special Issue: Prevention: Focus on children and youth), 13, 95-110.
14. Pikas, A. (1975). Så stoppar vi mobbning. Stockholm: Prisma.
15. Rigby, K. and Slee, P. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behaviour and attitudes towards victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615-27.
16. Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 453-59.
17. Salmivalli, C. (2001a). Group view on victimization-empirical findings and their implications. In J. Juvonen and S. Graham (eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 398-419.
18. Salmivalli, C. (2001b). Peer-led intervention campaign against school bullying: Who considered it useful, who benefited? Educational Research, 43, 263-278.
19. Salmivalli, C. (2003). Koulukiusaamiseen puutuminen: Kohti tehokkaita toimintamalleja [School bullying: Towards effective interventions]. Jyväskylä: PS-Kustannus.
20. Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., and Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 305-12.
21. Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., and Voeten, M. (in press). Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
22. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., and Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.
23. Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., and Lagerspetz, K. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205-18.
24. Salmivalli, C. and Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behavior in bullying situations. International Journal of Behaviored Development, 28, 246-258.
25. Sharp, S. and Smith, P. K. (1994). Tackling bullying in your school: A practical handbook for teachers. London: Routledge.
26. Sharp, S. and Thompson, D. (1994). The role of whole-school policies in tackling bullying behaviour in schools. In P. K. Smith and S. Sharp (eds.), School bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 57-83.
27. Snijders, T. A. B. and Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage.
28. Stevens, V., Van Oost, P., and de Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2000). The effects of an antibullying intervention programme on peers’ attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 21-34.
29. Sutton, J. and Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97-111.
30. Whitney, I., Rivers, I., Smith, P. K., and Sharp, S. (1994). The Sheffield project: Methodology and findings. In P. K. Smith and S. Sharp (eds.), School Bullying: Insights and perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 20-56.