The wald test and Cramér-Rao bound for misspecified models in electromagnetic source analysis

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 3427-3435

  Waldorp, Lourens J ^a,b   Huizenga, Hilde M ^a   Grasman, Raoul P P P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Approximate model; Constrained optimization; Fisher information with constraints; Model checking; Parameter covariance; Separable least squares; Source localization

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BRAIN; CONSTRAINT THEORY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICAL METHODS;

APPROXIMATE MODEL; CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION; CRAMER-RAO BOUND; ELECTROMAGNETIC SOURCE ANALYSIS; FISHER INFORMATION WITH CONSTRAINTS; MODEL CHECKING; PARAMETER COVARIANCE; SEPARABLE LEAST SQUARES; SOURCE LOCALIZATION; WALD TEST;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 27644466426     PISSN: 1053587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2005.853213     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. H. M. Huizenga and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Estimating and testing the sources of evoked potentials in the brain," Multivariate Behavioral Res., vol. 29, pp. 237-267, 1994.
2. M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, and O. V. Lounasmaa, "Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain," Rev. Modern Phys., vol. 65, pp. 413-497, 1993.
3. R. D. Pascual-Marqui and R. Biscay-Lirio, "Spatial resolution of neuronal generators based on EEG and MEG measurements," Int. J. Neurosci., vol. 68, pp. 93-105, 1993.
4. J. C. de Munck and M. J. Peters, "A fast method to compute the potential in the multisphere model," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1166-1174, Nov. 1993.
5. M. Peters and J. de Munck, "On the forward and the inverse problem for EEG and MEG," in Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials, F. H. Grori, M. Hoke, and G. L. Romani, Eds. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1989.
6. D. Gutiérrez, A. Nehorai, and C. H. Muravchik, "Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays," IEEE Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 2113-2122, Dec. 2004.
7. J. C. de Munck, B. W. van Dijk, and H. Spekreijse, "Mathematical dipoles are adequate to describe realistic generators of human brain activity," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 960-966, Nov. 1988.
8. J. C. Mosher, R. M. Leahy, D. W. Shattuck, and S. Baillet et al., "MEG source imaging using multipolar expansions," in Proc. IPMI99, A. Kuba et al., Eds., Heidelberg, Germany, 1999.
9. S. Supek and C. J. Aine, "Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: Model order and limits of source resolution," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 529-540, Jun. 1993.
10. H. M. Huizenga, "The Statistical Approach to Electromagnetic Source Localization in the Brain," Ph.D., Univ. Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
11. J. Malmivuo, V. Suihko, and H. Eskola, "Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 196-208, Mar. 1997.
12. H. M. Huizenga and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Equivalent source estimation of scalp potential fields contaminated by heteroscedastic and correlated noise," Brain Topograph., vol. 8, pp. 13-33, 1995.
13. T. R. Knösche, E. M. Berends, H. R. A. Jagers, and M. J. Peters, "Determining the number of independent sources of the EEG: A simulation study on information criteria," Brain Topograph., vol. 11, pp. 111-124, 1998.
14. C.-G. Bénar, R. N. Gunn, C. Grova, B. Champagne, and J. Gotman, "Statistical maps for EEG dipolar source localization," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 401-413, Mar. 2005.
15. J. C. Mosher, P. S. Lewis, and R. M. Leahy, "Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 541-557, Jun. 1992.
16. J. C. Mosher and R. M. Leahy, "Source localization using recursively applied and projected (rap) music," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 332-340, Feb. 1999.
17. R. Grave de Peralta Menendez, M. M. Murray, C. M. Michel, R. Martuzzi, and S. L. G. Andino, "Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints," NeuroImag., vol. 21, pp. 527-539, 2004.
18. A. M. Dale, A. K. Liu, B. R. Fischi, R. L. Buckner, J. W. Belliveau, J. D. Lewine, and E. Halgren, "Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: Combining fMRI and MEG for high resolution imaging of cortical activity," Neuron, vol. 26, pp. 55-67, 2000.
19. A. Sabharwal and L. Potter, "Wald statistic for model order selection in superposition models," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 956-965, Apr. 2002.
20. C.-H. J. Ying, A. Sabharwal, and R. L. Moses, "A combined order selection and parameter estimation algorithm for undamped exponentials," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 693-701, mar. 2000.
21. L. J. Waldorp, H. M. Huizenga, R. P. P. P. Grasman, B. E. Böcker, J. C. de Munck, and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Model selection in electromagnetic source analysis with an application to VEFs," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1121-1129, Oct. 2002.
22. L. J. Waldorp, H. M. Huizenga, A. Nehorai, R. P. P. P. Grasman, and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Model selection in spatio-temporal electromagnetic source analysis," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 414-420, Mar. 2005.
23. H. White, "Using least squares to approximate unknown regression functions," Int. Econ. Rev., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 149-170, 1980.
24. H. White, "Consequences and detection of misspecified and nonlinear regression models," J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., vol. 76, no. 374, pp. 419-433, 1981.
25. J. C. Mosher, M. E. Spencer, R. M. Leahy, and P. S. Lewis, "Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization," Electroencephalog. Clinical Neurophysiol., vol. 86, pp. 303-321, 1993.
26. P. Stoica, M. Viberg, and B. Otterston, "Instrumental variable approach to array processing in spatially correlated noise fields," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 121-133, Jan. 1994.
27. M. Viberg, P. Stoica, and B. Otterston, "Array processing in correlated noise fields based on instrumental variables and subspace fitting," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1187-1199, May 1995.
28. K. Mahata and T. Söderström, "Large sample properties of separable nonlinear least squares estimators," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1650-1658, Jun. 2004.
29. R. Golden, "Making correct statistical inferences using the wrong probability model," J. Math. Psychol., vol. 39, pp. 3-20, 1995.
30. H. White, "Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models," Econometrica, vol. 50, pp. 1-25, 1982.
31. G. H. Golub and V. Pereyra, "The differentiation of pseudo-inverses and nolinear least squares problems whose variables separate," SIAM J. Numerical Anal., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 413-432, 1973.
32. G. H. Golub and V. Pereyra, "Separable nonlinear least squares: The variable projection method and its applications," Inverse Prob., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1-26, 2003.
33. A. W. Van der Vaart, Asymptotic Statistics. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998.
34. J. C. de Munck, P. C. M. Vijn, and F. H. Lopes da Silva, "A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 791-804, Aug. 1992.
35. M. Scherg, "Fundementals of dipole source potential analysis," in Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials, F. Grori, M. Hoke, and G. L. Romani, Eds. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1990, pp. 40-69.
36. J. C. de Munck, "The estimation of time varying dipoles on the basis of evoked potentials," Electroencephalog. Clinical Neurophysiol., vol. 77, pp. 156-160, 1990.
37. H. M. Huizenga, J. C. de Munck, L. J. Waldorp, and R. P. P. P. Grasman, "Spatiotemporal EEGIMEG source analysis based on a parametric noise covariance model," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 533-539, Jun. 2002.
38. G. A. F. Seber and C. J. Wild, Nonlinear Regression. Toronto, ON, Canada: Wiley, 1989.
39. R. J. Muirhead, Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. New York: Wiley, 1982.
40. E. F. Vonesh and V. M. Chinchilli, Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1997.
41. T. Amemiya, Advanced Econometrics. Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell, 1985.
42. L. J. Waldorp, H. M. Huizenga, C. V. Dolan, and P. C. M. Molenaar, "Estimated generalized least squares electromagnetic source analysis based on a parametric noise covariance model," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 737-741, Jun. 2001.
43. G. Kauermann and R. J. Carroll, "A note on the efficiency of sandwich covariance extimation," J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., vol. 96, no. 456, pp. 1387-1396, 2001.
44. J. R. Magnus and H. Neudecker, Matrix Differential Calculus With Applications in Statistics and Economics. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 1999.
45. S. D. Silvey, "The Lagrangian multiplier test," Ann. Math. Statist., vol. 30, pp. 389-407, 1959.
46. R. F. Engle, "Wald, likelihood ratio, and lagrange multiplier tests in econometires," in Handbook of Econometrics, Z. Gilliches and M. Intriligator, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1984, vol. I, pp. 775-826.
47. E. L. Lehmann, Testing Statistical Hypotheses. New York: Wiley, 1959.
48. S. Gonçalvez, J. C. de Munck, J. P. A. Verbunt, R. M. Heethaar, and F. H. Lopez da Silva, "In vivo measurent of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and combined analysis of SEF/SEP data," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1124-1128, Sep. 2003.
49. Z. Zhang, "A fast method to compute surface potentials generated by dipoles within multilayer anisotropic spheres," Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 40, pp. 335-349, 1995.
50. J. C. Mosher, R. M. Leahy, and P. S. Lewis, "EEG and MEG: Forward solutions for inverse methods," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 245-259, Mar. 1999.