Dynamic material properties of the tectorial membrane: A summary

Hearing Research

Volumn 180, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 1-10

  Freeman, Dennis M ^a,b,c   Abnet, C Cameron ^d   Hemmert, Werner ^e   Tsai, Betty S ^f   Weiss, Thomas F ^a,b,c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^d Lightwave Instruments LLC   (United States)

^e INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG   (Germany)

^f BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bulk modulus; Cochlea; Connective tissue; Fixed charge; Macromechanics; Material property; Micromechanics; Osmotic response; Point impedance; Polyelectrolyte gel; Stiffness; Tectorial membrane; Viscoelastic

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BASILAR MEMBRANE; CELL AGGREGATION; COCHLEA DUCT; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DYNAMICS; ENDOLYMPH; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HAIR CELL; MATERIAL STATE; MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; OSMOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; VISCOELASTICITY;

EID: 0038699292     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00073-X     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abnet C.C., Freeman D.M. Deformations of the isolated mouse tectorial membrane produced by oscillatory forces. Hear. Res. 144:2000;29-46.
2. Allen J.B. Cochlear micromechanics - a physical model of transduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68:1980;1660-1670.
3. Aranyosi, A.J., Davis, C.Q., Freeman, D.M., 1998. Experimental measurements of micromechanical functions in the alligator lizard cochlea. In: Abstracts of the Twenty-Third Midwinter Research Meeting, St. Petersburg Beach, FL. Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p. 183.
4. Arima T., Lim D.J., Kawaguchi H., Shibata Y., Uemura T. An ultrastructural study of the guinea pig tectorial membrane 'type A' protofibril. Hear. Res. 46:1990;289-292.
5. Ashmore J.F. The stiffness of the sensory hair bundle of frog saccular hair cells. J. Physiol. 350:1984;20P.
6. Billone M., Raynor S. Transmission of radial shear forces to cochlear hair cells. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54:1973;1143-1156.
7. Crawford A.C., Fettiplace R. The mechanical properties of ciliary bundles of turtle cochlear hair cells. J. Physiol. 364:1985;359-379.
8. Dallos P., Billone M.C., Durrant J.D., Wang C.Y., Raynor S. Cochlear inner and outer hair cells: Functional differences. Science. 177:1972;356-358.
9. Davis C.Q., Freeman D.M. Statistics of subpixel registration algorithms based on spatiotemporal gradients or block matching. Opt. Eng. 37:1998;1290-1298.
10. Davis C.Q., Freeman D.M. Using a light microscope to measure motions with nanometer accuracy. Opt. Eng. 37:1998;1299-1304.
11. Davis H. A mechano-electrical theory of cochlear action. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 67:1958;789-801.
12. Davis, S.S., 1973. Rheological examination of sputum and saliva and the effect of drugs. In: Gabelnick, H.L., Litt, M. (Eds.), Rheology of Biological Systems Ch. 7. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp. 158-194.
13. de Boer, E., 1996. Mechanics of the cochlea: Modeling efforts. In: Dallos, P., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (Eds.), The Cochlea. Springer, New York, pp. 258-317.
14. Denny M.W., Gosline J.M. The physical properties of the pedal mucus of the terrestrial slug, Ariolimax columbianus. J. Exp. Biol. 88:1980;375-393.
15. Ferry, J.D., 1980. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. Wiley, New York.
16. Fitzgerald E.R., Freeland A.E. Viscoelastic response of intervertebral disks at audio frequencies. Med. Biol. Eng. 9:1970;459-478.
17. Freeman D.M., Weiss T.F. Superposition of hydrodynamic forces on a hair bundle. Hear. Res. 48:1990;1-16.
18. Freeman, D.M., Masaki, K., McAllister, A.R., Wei, J.L., Weiss, T.F., 2003. Static material properties of the tectorial membrane: A summary. S0378-5955(03)00072-8.
19. Fung, Y.C., 1993. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer, New York.
20. Geisler C.D. A model of the effect of outer hair cell motility on cochlear vibrations. Hear. Res. 24:1986;125-131.
21. Géléoc G.S.G., Lennan G.W.T., Richardson G.P., Kros C.J. A quantitative comparison of mechanoelectrical transduction in vestibular and auditory hair cells of neonatal mice. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 264:1997;611-621.
22. Gummer A.W., Hemmert W., Zenner H.-P. Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: Its crucial role in frequency tuning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;8727-8732.
23. Gummer A.W., Johnstone B.M., Armstrong N.J. Direct measurement of basilar membrane stiffness in the guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70:1981;1298-1309.
24. Hasko J.A., Richardson G.P. The ultrastructural organization and properties of the mouse tectorial membrane matrix. Hear. Res. 35:1988;21-38.
25. Hemmert, W., Tsai, B.S., Freeman, D.M., 2000. Mechanical impedance of the isolated tectorial membrane. In: Abstracts of the Twenty-Third Midwinter Research Meeting, St. Petersburg Beach, FL. Association Research in Otolaryngology, p. 207.
26. Hemmert W., Zenner H.P., Gummer A.W. Three-dimensional motion of the organ of Corti. Biophys. J. 78:2000;2285-2297.
27. Howard J., Ashmore J.F. Stiffness of sensory hair bundles in the sacculus of the frog. Hear. Res. 23:1986;93-104.
28. Howard J., Hudspeth A.J. Compliance of the hair bundle associated with gating of mechanoelectric transduction channels in the bullfrog's saccular hair cells. Neuron. 1:1988;189-199.
29. Hu X., Evans B.N., Dallos P. Direct visualization of organ of Corti kinematics in a hemicochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 82:1999;2798-2807.
30. Iatridis J.C., Weidenbaum M., Setton L.A., Mow V.C. Is the nucleus pulposus a solid or a fluid? Mechanical behaviors of the nucleus pulposus of the human intervertebral disc. Spine. 321:1996;1174-1184.
31. Johnstone J.R., Johnstone B.M. Origin of summating potential. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 40:1966;1405-1413.
32. Kolston P.J. Sharp mechanical tuning in a cochlear model without negative damping. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83:1988;1481-1487.
33. Kössl M., Richardson G.P., Russell I.J. Stereocilia bundle stiffness: effects of neomycin sulphate and A23187 and concanavalin A. Hear. Res. 44:1990;217-230.
34. Kronester-Frei A. Ultrastructure of the different zones of the tectorial membrane. Cell. Tiss. Res. 193:1978;11-23.
35. Langer M.G., Fink S., Koitschev A., Rexhausen U., Hörber J.K.H., Ruppersberg J.P. Lateral mechanical coupling of stereocilia in cochlear hair bundles. Biophys. J. 80:2001;2608-2621.
36. Legan P.K., Lukashkina V.A., Goodyear R.J., Kössl M., Russell I.J., Richardson G.P. A targeted deletion in α-tectorin reveals that the tectorial membrane is required for the gain and timing of cochlear feedback. Neuron. 28:2000;273-285.
37. Lim D.J. Fine morphology of the tectorial membrane: Its relation to the organ of Corti. Arch. Otolaryngol. 96:1972;199-215.
38. Lim D.J. Functional structure of the organ of Corti: a review. Hear. Res. 22:1986;117-146.
39. Mammano F., Nobili R. Biophysics of the cochlea: Linear approximation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;3320-3332.
40. 2+ concentration on hair-bundle stiffness and gating-spring integrity in hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;11923-11928.
41. Martin P., Mehta A.D., Hudspeth A.J. Negative hair-bundle stiffness betrays a mechanism for mechanical amplification by the hair cell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;12026-12031.
42. McGuirt W.T., Prasad S.D., Griffith A.J., Kunst H.P.M., Green G.E., Shpargel K.B., Runge C., Huybrechts C., Mueller R.E., Lynch E., King M.C., Brunner H.G., Cremers C.W.R.J., Takanosu M., Li S.W., Arita M., Mayne R., Prockop D.J., Camp G.V., Smith R.J.H. Mutations in COL11A2 cause non-syndromic hearing loss (DFNA13). Nat. Genet. 23:1999;413-419.
43. Miller C.E. Structural implications of basilar membrane compliance measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77:1985;1465-1474.
44. Naidu R.C., Mountain D.C. Measurements of the stiffness map challenge a basic tenet of cochlear theories. Hear. Res. 124:1998;124-131.
45. Naidu, R.C., Mountain, D.C., 2000. Longitudinal coupling within the basilar membrane and reticular lamina. In: Wada, H., Takasaka, T., Ikeda, K., Ohyama, K., Koike, T. (Eds.), Recent Developments in Auditory Mechanics. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 123-129.
46. Neely S.T., Kim D.O. An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity. Hear. Res. 9:1983;123-130.
47. Olson E.S., Mountain D.C. In vivo measurement of basilar membrane stiffness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:1991;1262-1275.
48. Olson E.S., Mountain D.C. Mapping the cochlear partition's stiffness to its cellular architecture. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:1994;395-400.
49. Orman S., Flock A. Stiffness measurements of stereociliary bundles in frog crista ampullaris. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 7:1981;536.
50. Patuzzi, R., 1996. Cochlear micromechanics and macromechanics. In: Dallos, P., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (Eds.), The Cochlea. Springer, New York, pp. 186-257.
51. Rack P.M.H., Ross H.F. The tendon of flexor pollicus longus: its effects on the muscular control of force and position at the human thumb. J. Physiol. 351:1984;99-110.
52. Rhode W.S., Geisler C.D. Model of the displacement between opposing points on the tectorial membrane and reticular lamina. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42:1967;185-190.
53. Ruggero, M.A., Rich, N.C., Robles, L., 1996. The effects of acoustic trauma, other cochlear injury, and death on basilar-membrane responses to sound. In: Axelsson, A., Borchgrevink, H., Hellström, P.A., Henderson, D., Hamernik, R.P., Salvi, R.J. (Eds.), Scientific Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Thieme Medical, New York, pp. 23-35.
54. Russell I.J., Kössl M., Richardson G.P. Nonlinear mechanical responses of mouse cochlear hair bundles. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 250:1992;217-227.
55. Shotwell S.L., Jacobs R., Hudspeth A.J. Directional sensitivity of individual vertebrate hair cells to controlled deflection of their hair bundles. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 374:1981;1-10.
56. Simmler M.C., Cohen-Salmon M., El-Amraoui A., Guillaud L., Benichou J.C., Petit C., Panthier J.J. Targeted disruption of Otog results in deafness and severe imbalance. Nat. Genet. 24:2000;139-143.
57. Steel K.P. The tectorial membrane in mammals. Hear. Res. 9:1983;327-359.
58. Strelioff D., Flock A. Stiffness of sensory-cell hair bundles in the isolated guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 15:1984;19-28.
59. Taber L.A., Steele C.R. Cochlear model including three-dimensional fluid and four modes of partition flexibility. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70:1981;426-436.
60. Timoshenko, S.P., Goodier, J.N., 1970. Theory of Elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York.
61. von Békésy G. The variation of phase along the basilar membrane with sinusoidal vibrations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19:1947;452-460.
62. von Békésy G. On the elasticity of the cochlear partition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 20:1948;227-241.
63. von Békésy G. Description of some mechanical properties of the organ of Corti. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25:1953;770-785.
64. Zwislocki J.J. Tectorial membrane: a possible sharpening effect on the frequency analysis in the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. 87:1979;267-279.
65. Zwislocki J.J. Five decades of research on cochlear mechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:1980;1679-1685.
66. Zwislocki J.J., Cefaratti L.K. Tectorial membrane II: Stiffness measurements in vivo. Hear. Res. 42:1989;211-228.
67. Zwislocki J.J., Kletsky E.J. Tectorial membrane: A possible effect on frequency analysis in the cochlea. Science. 204:1979;639-641.
68. Zwislocki J.J., Kletsky E.J. Micromechanics in the theory of cochlear mechanics. Hear. Res. 2:1980;505-512.