Deformations of the isolated mouse tectorial membrane produced by oscillatory forces

Hearing Research

Volumn 144, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 29-46

  Abnet, C Cameron ^a,c   Freeman, Dennis M ^b,c,d  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b USA   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Cochlea; Magnetic bead; Mechanical coupling; Micromechanics; Mouse; Tectorial membrane; Viscoelastic

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; COCHLEA DUCT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFORMITY; FORCE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; MALE; MECHANICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; VISCOELASTICITY;

ANIMALS; ANISOTROPY; ELASTICITY; MAGNETICS; MALE; MICE; MICROSPHERES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TECTORIAL MEMBRANE; TIME FACTORS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0034108394     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00041-1     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abnet, C.C., Freeman, D.M., 1997. Mechanical properties of the isolated mouse tectorial membrane. In: Abstracts of the Twentieth Midwinter Research Meeting, St. Petersburg Beach, FL. Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p. 13.
2. Abnet, C.C., Freeman, D.M., 1998. Deformations of the isolated mouse tectorial membrane produced by calibrated, oscillatory forces. In: Abstracts of the Twenty-First Midwinter Research Meeting, St. Petersburg Beach, FL. Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p. 183.
3. Allen J.B. Cochlear micromechanics - a physical model of transduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68:1980;1660-1670.
4. Bausch A.R., Ziemann F., Boulbitch A.A., Jacobson K., Sackmann E. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. Biophys. J. 75:1998;2038-2049.
5. Billone M., Raynor S. Transmission of radial shear forces to cochlear hair cells. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54:1973;1143-1156.
6. Cooper N.P., Rhode W.S. Nonlinear mechanics at the apex of the guinea-pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 82:1997;225-243.
7. Dallos P., Billone M.C., Durrant J.D., Wang C.Y., Raynor S. Cochlear inner and outer hair cells: Functional differences. Science. 177:1972;356-358.
8. Davis C.Q., Freeman D.M. Statistics of subpixel registration algorithms based on spatiotemporal gradients or block matching. Opt. Eng. 37:1998;1290-1298.
9. Davis C.Q., Freeman D.M. Using a light microscope to measure motions with nanometer accuracy. Opt. Eng. 37:1998;1299-1304.
10. Davis H. A mechano-electrical theory of cochlear action. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 67:1958;789-801.
11. de Boer, E., 1996. Mechanics of the cochlea: Modeling efforts. In: Dallos, P., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (Eds.), The Cochlea. Springer, New York, pp. 258-317.
12. Freeman, D.M., Weiss, T.F., 1986. On the role of fluid inertia and viscosity in stereociliary tuft motion: Analysis of isolated bodies of regular geometry. In: Allen, J.B., Hall, J.L., Hubbard, A., Neely, S.T., Tubis, A. (Eds.), Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms, Vol. 64 in Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 147-154.
13. Freeman D.M., Hattangadi S.M., Weiss T.F. Osmotic responses of the isolated mouse tectorial membrane to changes in pH. Audit. Neurosci. 3:1997;363-375.
14. Geisler C.D. A model of the effect of outer hair cell motility on cochlear vibrations. Hear. Res. 24:1986;125-131.
15. Hartog, J.P.D., 1956. Mechanical Vibrations. McGraw-Hill, New York.
16. Hasko J.A., Richardson G.P. The ultra-structural organization and properties of the mouse tectorial membrane matrix. Hear. Res. 35:1988;21-38.
17. Hayes W.C., Bodine A.J. Flow-independent viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage matrix. J. Biomech. 11:1941;407-419.
18. Hudspeth A.J., Corey D.P. Controlled bending of high-resistance glass microelectrodes. Am. J. Physiol. 234:1978;C56-C57.
19. James S.L., Marriott C. A modified oscillating sphere magnetic microrheometer for use with biological secretions. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 15:1982;179-181.
20. Johnstone J.R., Johnstone B.M. Origin of summating potential. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 40:1966;1405-1413.
21. Kempson G.E., Muir H., Pollard C., Tuke M. The tensile properties of the cartilage of human femoral condyles related to the content of collagen and glycosaminoglycans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 297:1973;456-472.
22. King M., Macklem P.T. Rheological properties of microliter quantities of normal mucus. J. Appl. Physiol.: Respir. Environ. Exercise Physiol. 42:1977;797-802.
23. Kolston P.J. Sharp mechanical tuning in a cochlear model without negative damping. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83:1988;1481-1487.
24. Kronester-Frei A. Ultrastructure of the different zones of the tectorial membrane. Cell Tissue Res. 193:1978;11-23.
25. Lim D.J. Fine morphology of the tectorial membrane. Arch. Otolaryngol. 96:1972;199-215.
26. Lim D.J. Cochlear anatomy related to cochlear micromechanics. A review. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:1980;1686-1695.
27. Lim D.J. Functional structure of the organ of Corti: A review. Hear. Res. 22:1986;117-146.
28. Lutz, R.J., Litt, M., Chakrin, L.W., 1973. Physical-chemical factors in mucus rheology. In: Gabelnick, H.L., Litt, M. (Eds.), Rheology of Biological Systems. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
29. Mammano F., Nobili R. Biophysics of the cochlea: Linear approximation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;3320-3332.
30. Naidu, R.C., Mountain, D.C., 1998. Can longitudinal coupling within the cochlear partition be neglected? In: Abstracts of the Twenty-First Midwinter Research Meeting, St. Petersburg Beach, FL. Association Research in Otolaryngology.
31. Neely S.T., Kim D.O. An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity. Hear. Res. 9:1983;123-130.
32. Neely S.T., Kim D.O. A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1986;1472-1480.
33. Patuzzi, R., 1996. Cochlear micromechanics and macromechanics. In: Dallos, P., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (Eds.), The Cochlea. Springer, New York, pp. 186-257.
34. Rhode W.S. Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:1981;1218-1231.
35. Rhode W.S., Geisler C.D. Model of the displacement between opposing points on the tectorial membrane and reticular lamina. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42:1967;185-190.
36. Richardson, G.P., Russell, I.J., Wasserkort, R., Hans, M., 1989. Aminoglycoside antibiotics and lectins cause irreversible increases in the stiffness of cochlear hair-cell stereocilia. In: Wilson, J.P., Kemp, D.T. (Eds.), Cochlear Mechanisms: Structure, Function, and Models. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 57-65.
37. Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C., Recio A., Narayan S.S., Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1997;2151-2163.
38. Seifriz W. An elastic value of protoplasm, with further observations on the viscosity of protoplasm. Br. J. Exp. Biol. 2:1924;1-11.
39. Sellick P.M., Patuzzi R., Johnstone B.M. Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72:1982;131-141.
40. 2+ concentration. Hear. Res. 87:1995;187-207.
41. Steel K.P. Donnan equilibrium in the tectorial membrane. Hear. Res. 12:1983;265-272.
42. Strelioff D., Flock A. Stiffness of sensory-cell hair bundles in the isolated guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 15:1984;19-28.
43. Thalmann I. Collagen of accessory structures of organ of Corti. Connect. Tissue Res. 29:1993;191-201.
44. Thalmann I., Machiki K., Calabro A., Hascall V., Vincent C., Thalmann R. Composition and supramolecular organization of the tectorial membrane. Laryngoscope. 97:1987;357-367.
45. Thalmann I., Machiki K., Calabro A., Hascall V.C., Thalmann R. Uronic acid-containing glycosamino-glycans and keratan sulfate are present in the tectorial membrane of the inner ear: Functional implications. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 307:1993;391-396.
46. Tortonese M. Cantilevers and tips for atomic force microscopy. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 16:1997;28-33.
47. Tortonese M., Kirk M. Characterization of application specific probes for SPMs. SPIE. 3009:1997;53-60.
48. Tran-Son-Tay R., Beaty B.B., Acker D.N., Hochmuth R.M. Magnetically driven, acoustically tracked, translating-ball rheometer for small, opaque samples. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59:1988;1399-1404.
49. Tsuprun V., Santi P. Crystalline arrays of proteoglycan and collagen in the tectorial membrane. Matrix Biol. 15:1996;31-38.
50. von Békésy, G., 1960. Experiments in Hearing. McGraw-Hill, New York.
51. Wang N., Butler J.P., Ingber D.E. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 260:1993;1124-1126.
52. Weiss T.F., Freeman D.M. Equilibrium behavior of an isotropic polyelectrolyte gel model of the tectorial membrane: Effect of pH. Hear. Res. 111:1997;55-64.
53. Weiss T.F., Freeman D.M. Equilibrium behavior of an isotropic polyelectrolyte gel model of the tectorial membrane: The role of fixed charges. Audit. Neurosci. 3:1997;351-361.
54. Yih, C.-S., 1979. Fluid Mechanics. West River Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
55. Zahn, M., 1979. Electromagnetic Field Theory: A Problem Solving Approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
56. Zaner K.S., Valberg P.A. Viscoelasticity of F-actin measured with magnetic microparticles. J. Cell Biol. 109:1989;2233-2243.
57. Zhu W., Iatridis J.C., Hlibezuk V., Ratcliffe A., Mow V.C. Determination of collagen-proteoglycan interactions in vitro. J. Biomech. 29:(6):1996;773-783.
58. Ziemann F., Radler J., Sackmann E. Local measurements of viscoelastic moduli of entangled actin networks using an oscillating magnetic bead micro-rheometer. Biophys. J. 66:1994;2210-2216.
59. Zwislocki J.J. Tectorial membrane: a possible sharpening effect on the frequency analysis in the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. 87:1979;267-279.
60. Zwislocki J.J., Cefaratti L.K. Tectorial membrane II: Stiffness measurements in vivo. Hear. Res. 42:1989;211-228.
61. Zwislocki J.J., Kletsky E.J. Tectorial membrane: A possible effect on frequency analysis in the cochlea. Science. 204:1979;639-641.
62. Zwislocki J.J., Kletsky E.J. Micromechanics in the theory of cochlear mechanics. Hear. Res. 2:1980;505-512.