Bonding of ceramic insert to a laboratory particle filler composite

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 272-277

  Kienanen, Pietari ^a,b   Alander, Pasi ^a   Lassila, Lippo V J ^a   Vallittu, Pekka K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b HAAGA HELIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FILLER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CHEMICAL BOND; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; MATERIAL COATING; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLECULAR STABILITY; PARTICLE SIZE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL BONDING; POLYURETHANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 27144549049     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350510020025     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. MacCulloch WT. Advances in dental ceramics. Br Dent J 1968;124:361-5.
2. Bowen RL. Properties of silica reinforced polymer for dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1963;66:57-64.
3. Kukrer D, Gemalmaz D, Kuybulu EO, Bozkurt FO. A prospective clinical study of ceromer inlays: results up to 53 months. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:17-23.
4. Schulz P, Johansson A, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of Mirage ceramic inlays over up to 9 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:510-14.
5. Rammelsberg P, Eickemeyer G, Erdelt K, Pospiech P. Fracture resistance of posterior metal-free polymer crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:303-8.
6. Suarez MJ, Lozano JF, Paz Salido M, Martinez F. Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:35-8.
7. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Saller A. In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results. J Dent 1996;24:25-31.
8. Van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlay/onlays: an 11-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
9. Vallittu PK. Survival rates of resin bonded, glass fibre-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures with mean follow-up of 42 months: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:241-6.
10. Vallittu PK. Prosthodontic treatment with a glass fiber-reinforced resin-bonded fixed partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:132-5.
11. Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Eckrote KA, Goldberg AJ. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced fixed bridges. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1524-34.
12. Gallegos LI, Nicholls JI. In vitro two-body wear of three veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:172-8.
13. Tani Y, Togaya T, Ishikawa A, Watanabe Y, Maruyama K, Katsuyama S. Effect of "Megafiller" insertion on the wear of composite resins. Dent Mater J 1994;13:174-81.
14. Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Inserts-megafillers in composite restoration: a literature review. Clin Oral Invest 2000;4:1-8.
15. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of glass inserts on resin composite wear. Am J Dent 1995;8:249-52.
16. Ödman P. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Cerana prefabricated ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:79-82.
17. Ödman P, Nillson E, Pietruszka K. Cerana: a new method for the restoration of teeth with prefabricated ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:340-7.
18. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:194-200.
19. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JWV. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with chemically cured or dual cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:241-6.
20. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Experimental design of FPD made of all-ceramic and fibre-reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2000;16:159-65.
21. Fischer H, Weber M, Eck M, Erdrich A, Marx R. Finite element and experimental analyses of polymer-based dental bridges reinforced by ceramic bars. J Biomech 2004;37:289-94.
22. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Pelka M. Zur komposithaftung von glaskeramikinserts. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1998;53:139-42.
23. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-31.
24. Matinlinna JP, Lassila LVJ, Özcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:155-64.
25. Hahn P, Schaller HG, Mullner U, Hellwig E. Marginal leakage in class II-restorations after use of ceramic-inserts luted with different materials. J Oral Rehab 1998;25:567-74.
26. Rantala LI, Lastumäki TM, Peltomäki T, Vallittu PK. Fatigue resistance of removable orthodontic appliance reinforced with glass fibre weave. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:501-6.
27. Fennis MM, Tezvergil A, Kuijs RH, Lassila LVJ, Kreulen CM, Creugers NHJ, et al. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005. In press.
28. Özcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MCH, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning Willem methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater M 2005;16:21-7.
29. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. Dent Mater 1999;15:262-7.
30. Murphy J. Reinforced plastics handbook, 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 1998. p 253-93.
31. Li ZC, White SN. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:597-609.
32. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989;17:61-7.