A new method for predicting functional recovery of stroke patients with hemiplegia: Logarithmic modelling

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 779-789

  Koyama, Tetsuo ^a   Matsumoto, Kenji ^a   Okuno, Taiji ^a   Domen, Kazuhisa ^a  

^a HYOGO COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONVALESCENCE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HEALTH SURVEY; HEMIPLEGIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTAL MAIL; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH THERAPY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STROKE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 27144516215     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr876oa     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Tilling K, Sterne JA, Rudd AG, Glass TA, Wityk RJ, Wolfe CD. A new method for predicting recovery after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 2867-73.
2. Dam M, Tonin P, Casson S et al. The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke 1993; 24: 1186-91.
3. Allen CM. Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: a prognostic score. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 475-80.
4. Reding MJ, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Life table analysis approach. Stroke 1988; 19: 1354-58.
5. Gladman JR, Harwood DM, Barer DH. Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: prospective evaluation of five multivariate models and comparison with simple methods. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55: 347-51.
6. Falconer JA, Naughton BJ, Dunlop DD, Roth EJ, Strasser DC, Sinacore JM. Predicting stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcome using a classification tree approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 619-25.
7. Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. Predicting stroke outcome: Guy's prognostic score in practice. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 932-35.
8. Mauthe RW, Haaf DC, Hayn P, Krall JM. Predicting discharge destination of stroke patients using a mathematical model based on six items from the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 10-13.
9. Lai SM, Duncan PW, Keighley J. Prediction of functional outcome after stroke: comparison of the Orpington Prognostic Scale and the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke 1998; 29: 1838-42.
10. Sanchez-Blanco I, Ochoa-Sangrador C, Lopez-Munain L, Izquierdo-Sanchez M, Fermoso-Garcia J. Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 464-75.
11. Thommessen B, Bautz-Holter E, Laake K. Predictors of outcome of rehabilitation of elderly stroke patients in a geriatric ward. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 123-28.
12. Inouye M. Predicting outcomes of patients in Japan after first acute stroke using a simple model. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 645-49.
13. Giaquinto S, Buzzelli S, Di Francesco L et al. On the prognosis of outcome after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 1999; 100: 202-208.
14. Partridge CJ, Johnston M, Edwards S. Recovery from physical disability after stroke: normal patterns as a basis for evaluation. Lancet 1987; 1: 373-75.
15. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 406-12.
16. Sonoda S, Chino N, Domen K, Saitoh E. Changes in impairment and disability from the third to the sixth month after stroke and its relationship evaluated by an artificial neural network. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76: 395-400.
17. Oczkowski WJ, Barreca S. Neural network modelling accurately predicts the functional outcome of stroke survivors with moderate disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 340-45.
18. Stineman MG, Maislin G, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. A prediction model for functional recovery in stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 550-56.
19. Lofgren B, Gustafson Y, Nyberg L. Cross-validation of a model predicting discharge home after stroke rehabilitation. Validating stroke discharge predictors. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000; 10: 118-25.
20. Calautti C, Baron JC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 2003; 34: 1553-66 Epub 2003 May 8.
21. Goodwin N, Sunderland A. Intensive, time-series measurement of upper limb recovery in the subacute phase following stroke. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 69-82.
22. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 127-32.
23. Wright BD, Linacre JM, Smith RM, Heinemann AW, Granger CV. FIM measurement properties and Rasch model details. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997; 29: 267-72.
24. Ring H, Feder M, Schwartz J, Samuels G. Functional measures of first-stroke rehabilitation inpatients: usefulness of the Functional Independence Measure total score with a clinical rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 630-35.
25. Kwon S, Hartzema AG, Duncan PW, Min-Lai S. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 2004; 35: 918-23.
26. Ween JE, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, Roberts M. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 1996; 47: 388-92.
27. Zinn S, Dudley TK, Bosworth HB, Hoenig HM, Duncan PW, Horner RD. The effect of poststroke cognitive impairment on rehabilitation process and functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1084-90.
28. Novack TA, Satterfield WT, Lyons K, Kolski G, Hackmeyer L, Connor M. Stroke onset and rehabilitation: time lag as a factor in treatment outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984; 65: 316-19.
29. Mayo NE, Korner-Bitensky NA, Becker R. Recovery time of independent function post-stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 70: 5-12.
30. Chaudhuri G, Harvey RF, Sulton LD, Lambert RW. Computerized tomography head scans as predictors of functional outcome of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 496-98.
31. Saeki S, Ogata H, Hachisuka K, Okubo T, Takahashi K, Hoshuyama T. Association between location of the lesion and discharge status of ADL in first stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 858-60.
32. Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002; 33: 179-85.
33. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, Traballesi M, Grasso MG, Lubich S. Poststroke depression and its role in rehabilitation of inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 985-90.
34. Katz N, Hartman-Maeir A, Ring H, Soroker N. Functional disability and rehabilitation outcome in right hemisphere damaged patients with and without unilateral spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 379-84.
35. Pettersen R, Dahl T, Wyller TB. Prediction of long-term functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 149-59.
36. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke-a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 479-89.
37. Asberg KH, Nydevik I. Early prognosis of stroke outcome by means of Katz Index of activities of daily living. Scand J Rehabil Med 1991; 23: 187-91.
38. Hellawell DJ, Taylor R, Pentland B. Persisting symptoms and carers' views of outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 333-40.
39. Svensson E, Starmark JE. Evaluation of individual and group changes in social outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a long-term follow-up study. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 251-59.