Persisting symptoms and carers' views of outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 333-340

  Hellawell, Deborah J ^a   Taylor, Robert ^b   Pentland, Brian ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b NHS LOTHIAN   (United Kingdom)

^c Scottish Brain Inj Rehab Service   (United Kingdom)

^d ASTLEY AINSLIE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMNESIA; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEPRESSION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MOOD; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELATIVE; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CAREGIVERS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032771130     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/026921599669500092     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hop JW, Rinkel GJE, Algra A, Van Gijn J. Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Stroke 1997; 28: 660-64.
2. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975; 1: 80-84.
3. Van Gijn J, Bromberg JE, Lindsay KW, Hasan D, Vermeulen M. Definition of initial grading, specific events, and overall outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A survey. [Review] Stroke 1994; 25: 1623-27.
4. Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
5. Clifton GL, Kreutzer JS, Choi SC et al. Relationship between Glasgow Outcome Scale and neuropsychological measures after brain injury. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 34-39.
6. Hütter BO, Gilsbach J. Which neuropsychological deficits are hidden behind a good outcome (Glasgow = I) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 999-1006.
7. Hop JW, Rinkel GJE, Algra A, Van Gijn J. Quality of life in patients and partners after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1998; 29: 798-804.
8. Ljunggren B, Sonesson B, Saveland H, Brandt L. Cognitive impairment and adjustment in patients without neurological deficits after aneurysmal SAH and early operation. J Neurosurg 1985; 62: 673-79.
9. Soryal I, Sloan RL, Skelton C, Pentland B. Rehabilitation needs after haemorrhagic brain injury: are they similar to those after traumatic brain injury? Clin Rehabil 1992; 6: 103-10.
10. Ogden JA, Levin PL, Mee EW. Long-term neuropsychological and psychosocial effects of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neuropsychiatr Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1990; 3: 260-74.
11. Dikmen S, Machamer J, Temkin N. Psychosocial outcome in patients with moderate to severe head injury: 2-year follow-up. Brain Inj 1993; 7: 113-24.
12. King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NEG, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol 1995; 242: 587-92.
13. Brooks DN. The head-injured family. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1991; 13: 155-88.
14. McKenna P, Willison JR, Neil-Dwyer G. Recovery after subarachnoid haemorrhage. BMJ 1989; 299: 485-87.
15. Hütter BO, Gilsbach J, Kreitschmann I. Quality of life and cognitive deficits after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Br J Neurosurg 1995; 9: 465-75.
16. Brooks DN, McKinlay W. Personality and behavioural change after severe blunt head injury -a relative's view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 336-44.
17. Brooks DN, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinlay W. The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: a relative's view. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1986; 49: 764-70.
18. Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinlay W. The effects of severe head injury on patient and relative within seven years of injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1987; 2: 1-13.
19. O'Sullivan MG, Sellar R, Statham PF, Whittle IR. Management of poor grade patients after subarachnoid haemorrhage: the importance of neuroradiological findings on clinical outcome. Br J Neurosurg 1996; 10: 445-52.
20. Drake CG, Hunt WE, Kassell N et al. Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Grading Scale. J Neurosurg 1988; 68: 985-86.
21. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-70.
22. Lindsay KW, Bone I, Callander R. Neurology and neurosurgery illustrated, second edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1991.
23. Gray JM, Shepherd M, McKinlay WW, Robertson I, Pentland B. Negative symptoms in the traumatically brain-injured during the first year postdischarge, and their effect on rehabilitation status, work status and family burden. Clin Rehabil 1994; 8: 188-97.
24. Sonesson B, Ljunggren B, Saveland H, Brandt L. Cognition and adjustment after late and early operation for ruptured aneurysm. Neurosurgery 1987; 21: 279-87.
25. Ogden JA, Mee EW, Henning M. A prospective study of impairment of cognition and memory and recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1993; 33; 572-87.
26. McKenna P, Willison JR, Lowe D, Neil-Dwyer G. Cognitive outcome and quality of life one year after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurosurgery 1989; 24; 361-67.
27. Pawlikowska T, Chalder T, Hirsch SR, Wallace P, Wright DJ, Wessely SC. Population based study of fatigue and psychological distress. BMJ 1994; 308: 763-66.
28. Vilkki J, Holst P, Ohman J, Servo A, Heiskanen O. Social outcome related to cognitive performance and computed tomographic findings after surgery for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Neurosurgery 1990; 26: 579-85.
29. Goldberg RJ. Diagnostic dilemmas presented by patients with anxiety and depression. Am J Med 1995; 98: 278-84.
30. Hellawell DJ, Signorini DF. Reliability and validity of the Relative's Questionnaire. In: Advances in Neurotrauma: from Research to Community Living. Sevilla: Editorial Kronos, 1997: 115.
31. Anderson SI, Taylor R, Jones PA, Miller JD. A comparison of neuropsychological and functional outcome, and uptake of rehabilitation services, following severe and moderate head injury. Clin Rehabil 1994; 8: 301-306.