Functional measures of first-stroke rehabilitation inpatients: Usefulness of the functional independence measure total score with a clinical rationale

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 630-635

  Ring, Haim ^a   Feder, Monica ^b   Schwartz, Julia ^b   Samuels, Guita ^b  

^a LOEWENSTEIN REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (Israel)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APHASIA; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEGLECT; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STROKE;

EID: 0030912549     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90429-9     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, editor. Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Baltimore: Brooks, 1987.
2. Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation. Report of first admissions for 1992. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73:51-5.
3. Granger CV, Ottenbacher KJ, Hamilton BB. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation. Report of first admissions for 1993. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74:62-6.
4. Fiedler RG, Granger CV, Ottenbacher KJ. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation. Report of first admissions for 1994. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 75:125-9.
5. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC, Hens MM. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71:870-5.
6. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:133-8.
7. Oczkowski WJ, Barreca S. The functional independence measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:1291-4.
8. Chau N, Daler S, Andre JM, Patris A. Inter-rater agreement of two functional independence scales: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and a subjective uniform continuous scale. Disabil Rehabil 1994; 16:63-71.
9. Ottenbacher KJ, Mann WC, Granger CV, Tomita M, Hurren D, Charvat B. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:1297-1301.
10. Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valerstein E, editors. Clinical neuropsychology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993:279-336.
11. Cermak SA, Lin K. Assessment of unilateral neglect in individuals with right cerebral vascular accident. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1994; 10: 42-55.
12. Denes G, Semenza C, Stoppa E, Lis A. Unilateral spatial neglect and recovery from hemiplegia. Brain 1982; 105:543-52.
13. Kinsella G, Ford B. Hemi-inattention and the recovery patterns of stroke patients. Int Rehabil Med 1985; 7:102-6.
14. Sunderland A, Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R. The natural history of visual neglect after stroke. Int Disabil Studies 1987; 9:60-1.
15. Antonucci E, Guariglia C, Judica A, Magnotti L, Paolucci S, Pizzamiglio L, et al. Effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation in a randomized group study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1995; 17:383-9.
16. Pedersen PM, Jorgesen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschov HO, Olsen TS. Orientation in the acute and chronic stroke patient: Impact on ADL and social activities. The Copennhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77:336-9.
17. Porcelli J. Aphasia assessment and treatment. In: Goldberg G, editor. Stroke rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil North Am 1991; 2:487-500.
18. Steinvil Y, Ring H, Luz Y, Schechter I, Solzi P. Type of aphasia: relationship to age, sex, previous risk factors and outcome of rehabilitation. Scand J Rehabil Med 1985;Suppl 12:68-71.
19. Widen-Holmquist T, De Pedro-Cuesta J, Holm M, Sandstrom B, Hellblom A, Stawiarz L, et al. Stroke rehabilitation in Stockholm. Basis for late intervention in patients living at home. Scand J Rehabil Med 1993; 25:173-81.
20. Feder M, Ring H, Motin M. Bladder control in first-stroke patients after in-patient rehabilitation. Relationship to age, right hemisphere damage, functional profile and neglect syndrome. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 6:106-9.
21. Gerber DA, Good DC, Laven LL, Verhulst SJ. Causes of urinary incontinence after acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1993; 24:378-82.
22. Davidoff GN, Keren O, Ring H, Solzi P. Who goes home after stroke. A case control study. Neurorehabil 1992; 2:53-62.
23. Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke. A critical review. Stroke 1986; 17:765-76.
24. Dombovy ML, Sandok BA, Basford JR. Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. Stroke 1986; 17:363-9.
25. Gordon EE, Drenth V, Jarvis L, Johnson J, Wright V. Neurophysiologic syndromes in stroke as predictors of outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1978; 59:399-403.
26. Ring H, Schwartz J, Elazar B, Bergbaus N, Luz Y, Solzi P, et al. Criteria for referral of CVA patients for rehabilitation. Scand J Rehabil Med 1985;suppl 12:143-7.
27. Findley TW, Zorowitz RD, Maney M, Johnston MV. Rehabilitation and functional evaluation of stroke survivor in New Jersey. In: Chino N, Melvin J, editors. Functional evaluation of stroke patients. Tokyo: Springer Verlag, 1996:59-73.
28. Johnston MV, Kirshblum S, Zorowitz RD, Shiflett SC. Prediction of outcomes following rehabilitation of stroke patients. Neurorehabil 1992; 2:71-96.
29. Katz N, Itzkovich M, Averbuch S, Elazar B. Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients: reliability and validity. Am J Occup Ther 1990; 43:184-92.
30. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Behavioral Inattention Test. Titchfield, Hants, UK: Thames Valley Test Company, 1987.
31. Hartman-Maeir A, Katz N. Validity of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT). Relationship with functional tasks. Am J Occup Ther 1995; 49:507-16.
32. Schechter I. Israeli Loewenstein Aphasia Test (ILAT). Tel Aviv: Loewenstein Rehabilitation Center, 1965.
33. Gil M, Schechter I, Bergman M. The transition stages between the main aphasic syndromes. Scand J Rehabil Med 1985;Suppl 12:72-5.
34. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Volume 2. 4th ed. Gary (NC): SAS Institute Inc., 1990.
35. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC. Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1992; 23:978-82.
36. Chae J, Zorowitz RD, Johnston MV. Functional outcome of hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic stroke patients after in-patient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 75:177-82.
37. Wagner MT, Cushman LA. Functional significance of the subcortical vascular syndrome in the rehabilitative setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:193-7.
38. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Relationship between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:566-73.
39. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:127-32.
40. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 72:84-9.
41. Stineman MG, Hamilton BB, Goin JE, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. Functional gain and length of stay for major rehabilitation impairment categories. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 75:68-78.
42. Chang N-C, Chan C. Rasch analysis for outcome measures: some methodological considerations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 934-9.
43. Stineman MG, Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Goin JE, Escarce JJ, Williams SV. Four methods of characterizing disability in the formation of function related groups. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:1277-83.
44. Stineman MG, Escarce JJ, Goin JE, Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Williams SV. A case-mix classification system of medical rehabilitation. Med Care 1994; 32:366-79.
45. Bunch WH, Dvonch VM. The "value" of functional independence measure scores. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73:40-3.
46. Segal ME, Gillard M, Schall RR. Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 75:208-12.
47. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75:133-43.
48. Keith RA, Wison DB, Gutierrez P. Acute and subacute rehabilitation for stroke: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 75: 495-500.
49. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:531-6.