Using the precursor to the relational evaluation procedure (PREP) to establish the relational frames of sameness, opposition, and distinction;Implementación del precursor del procedimiento de evaluación relacional en el establecimiento de marcos relacionales de igualdad, oposición y diferencia

Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 305-316

  Dixon, Mark R ^a,b,c   Zlomke, Kimberly M ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Universidad de Southern Illinois   (United States)

^c Association for Behavior Analysis Sobre Juego   (United States)

Author keywords

Matching to sample; Relational frame theory; Relational responding; Stimulus equivalence; Visual basic

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444609114     PISSN: 01200534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus Equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
2. Cullinan, V.A., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Smeets, P.M. (1998). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 121-145.
3. Cullinan, V.A., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Smeets, P.M. (2000). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure II. The Psychological Record, 50, 467-492.
4. Cullinan, V.A., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Smeets, P.M. (2001). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Searching for the contextual cues that control equivalence responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 339-349.
5. Dixon, M. R. & MacLin, O. H. (2003). Visual Basic for behavioral psychologists. Reno, NV: Context Press.
6. Dixon, M. R., Dymond, S., Rehfeldt, R. A., Roche, B. & Zlomke, K.R. (en prensa). Terrorism and relational frame theory. Behavior and Social Issues.
7. Green, G. & Saunders, R. R. (1998). Stimulus equivalence. En K. A. Lattal & M. Perone (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior (pp. 229-262). Plenum Press: Nueva York.
8. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Nueva York: Kluwer Academic.
9. Hayes, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog - verbal reports and the analysis of rules. A review of Ericsson and Simon's Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351-363.
10. Leader, G., Barnes, D. & Smeets, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
11. Leader, G. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Matching-to-sample and respondent-type training as methods for producing equivalence relations: Isolating the critical variable. The Psychological Record, 51, 429-444.
12. Rehfeldt, R. A. & Dixon, M. R. (2000). Investigating the relation between self-talk and emergent stimulus relations. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 18, 28-30.
13. Roche, B. & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned functions in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-301.
14. Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Stewart, I. & O'Hora, D. (2002). Relational frame theory: A new paradigm for the analysis of social behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 25, 75-91.
15. Steele, D. & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
16. Wulfert, E., Dougher, M. J. & Greenway, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489-504.