Signalling for developmental plasticity

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 309-314

  Casal, Jorge J ^a   Fankhauser, Christian ^b   Coupland, George ^c   Blázquez, Miguel A ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b Sciences III   (Switzerland)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PLANT BREEDING RESEARCH   (Germany)

^d Ciudad Politécnica de la Innovación   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ASSOCIATION; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LOLIUM; MORPHOGENESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CUES; ENVIRONMENT; LOLIUM; MORPHOGENESIS; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

LOLIUM;

EID: 2642542594     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.04.007     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Jürgens G. Apical-basal pattern formation in Arabidopsis embryogenesis. EMBO J. 20:2001;3609-3616
2. Queitsch C., et al. Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature. 417:2002;618-624
3. Bergman A., Siegal M.L. Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature. 424:2003;549-552
4. Pinyopich A., et al. Assessing the redundancy of MADS-box genes during carpel and ovule development. Nature. 424:2003;85-88
5. Johanson U., et al. Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time. Science. 290:2000;344-347
6. Michaels S.D., et al. Attenuation of FLOWERING LOCUS C activity as a mechanism for the evolution of summer-annual flowering behavior in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:2003;10102-10107
7. Trevaskis B., et al. MADS box genes control vernalization-induced flowering in cereals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:2003;13099-13104
8. Mazzella M.A., et al. Temperature-dependent internode elongation in vegetative plants of Arabidopsis thaliana lacking phytochrome B and cryptochrome 1. Planta. 210:2000;497-501
9. Blázquez M.A., et al. A thermosensory pathway controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Genet. 33:2003;168-171
10. Cerdán P., Chory J. Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature. 423:2003;881-885
11. Monte E., et al. Isolation and characterization of phyC mutants in Arabidopsis reveals complex crosstalk between phytochrome signaling pathways. Plant Cell. 15:2003;1962-1980
12. Franklin K.A., et al. Mutant analyses define roles for phytochrome C in Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell. 15:2003;1981-1989
13. Moore B., et al. Role of Arabidopsis glucose sensor HXK1 in nutrient, light, and hormonal signaling. Science. 300:2003;332-336
14. Casal J.J., et al. The serine-rich N-terminal domain of oat phytochrome A helps regulate light responses and subnuclear localization of the photoreceptor. Plant Physiol. 129:2002;1127-1137
15. Yanovsky M.J., et al. Missense mutation in the PAS2 domain of phytochrome A impairs subnuclear localization and a subset of responses. Plant Cell. 14:2002;1591-1603
16. Quail P.H. Phytochrome photosensory signalling networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:2002;85-93
17. Osterlund M.T., et al. Targeted destabilization of HY5 during light-regulated development of Arabidopsis. Nature. 405:2000;462-466
18. Botto J.F., et al. The Cape Verde Islands allele of cryptochrome 2 enhances cotyledon unfolding in the absence of blue light in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 133:2003;1547-1556
19. 2+-binding protein involved in cryptochrome and phytochrome coaction. Science. 291:2001;487-490
20. Duek P.D., Fankhauser C. HFR1, a putative bHLH transcription factor, mediates both phytochrome A and cryptochrome signalling. Plant J. 34:2003;827-836
21. Staiger D., et al. The Arabidopsis SRR1 gene mediates phyB signaling and is required for normal circadian clock function. Genes Dev. 17:2003;256-268
22. Selby C.P., et al. Functional redundancy of cryptochromes and classical photoreceptors for nonvisual ocular photoreception in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:2000;14697-14702
23. Más P., et al. Dual role of TOC1 in the control of circadian and photomorphogenic responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 15:2003;223-236
24. Kaczorowski K.A., Quail P.H. Arabidopsis PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR7 (PRR7) is a signaling intermediate in phytochrome-regulated seedling deetiolation and phasing of the circadian clock. Plant Cell. 15:2003;2654-2665
25. Anderson S.L., et al. Attenuation of phytochrome A and B signaling pathways by the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell. 9:1997;1727-1743
26. Suárez-López P., et al. CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. Nature. 410:2001;1116-1120
27. Yanovsky M.J., Kay S.A. Molecular basis of seasonal time measurement in Arabidopsis. Nature. 419:2002;308-312
28. Nishimura R., et al. A Lotus basic leucine zipper protein with a RING-finger motif negatively regulates the developmental program of modulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;15206-15210
29. Valverde F., et al. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science. 303:2004;1003-1006
30. Hayama R., et al. Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice. Nature. 422:2003;719-722
31. Halliday K.J., et al. Phytochrome control of flowering is temperature sensitive and correlates with expression of the floral integrator FT. Plant J. 33:2003;875-885
32. Hepworth S.R., et al. Antagonistic regulation of flowering-time gene SOC1 by CONSTANS and FLC via separate promoter motifs. EMBO J. 21:2002;4327-4337
33. Moon J., et al. The SOC1 MADS-box gene integrates vernalization and gibberellin signals for flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 35:2003;613-623
34. Michaels S.D., et al. AGL24 acts as a promoter of flowering in Arabidopsis and is positively regulated by vernalization. Plant J. 33:2003;867-874
35. Yu, H., et al. (2002) AGAMOUS-LIKE 24, a dosage-dependent mediator of the flowering signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 16336-16341.
36. Benvenuto G., et al. The photomorphogenesis regulator DET1 binds the amino-terminal tail of histone H2B in a nucleosome context. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;1529-1534
37. Schroeder D., et al. De-Etiolated 1 and Damaged DNA Binding Protein 1 interact to regulate Arabidopsis photomorphogenesis. Curr. Biol. 12:2002;1462-1472
38. Wei N., Deng X.W. The COP9 signalosome. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19:2003;261-286
39. Seo H.S., et al. LAF1 ubiquitination by COP1 controls photomorphogenesis and is stimulated by SPA1. Nature. 424:2003;995-999
40. Groisman R., et al. The ubiquitin ligase activity in the DDB2 and CSA complexes is differentially regulated by the COP9 signalosome in response to DNA damage. Cell. 113:2003;357-367
41. AtSKP2 pathway in response to light. Plant Cell. 14:2002;3057-3071
42. Gendall A.R., et al. The VERNALIZATION 2 gene mediates the epigenetic regulation of vernalization in Arabidopsis. Cell. 107:2001;525-535
43. Simpson G.G., et al. FY is an RNA 3′ end-processing factor that interacts with FCA to control the Arabidopsis floral transition. Cell. 113:2003;777-787
44. Piñeiro M., et al. EARLY BOLTING IN SHORT DAYS is related to chromatin remodeling factors and regulates flowering in Arabidopsis by repressing FT. Plant Cell. 15:2003;1552-1562
45. Takada S., Goto K. TERMINAL FLOWER 2, an Arabidopsis homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1, counteracts the activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the vascular tissues of leaves to regulate flowering time. Plant Cell. 15:2003;2856-2865
46. Folta K.M., et al. Genomic and physiological studies of early cryptochrome 1 action demonstrate roles for auxin and gibberellin in the control of hypocotyl growth by blue light. Plant J. 36:2003;203-214
47. Gutiérrez R.A., et al. Identification of unstable transcripts in Arabidopsis by cDNA microarray analysis: rapid decay is associated with a group of touch- and specific clock-controlled genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;11513-11518
48. Lee S., et al. Gibberellin regulates Arabidopsis seed germination via RGL2, a GAI/RGAI-like gene whose expression is up-regulated following imbibition. Genes Dev. 16:2002;646-658
49. Martínez-García J.F., et al. Direct targeting of light signals to a promoter element-bound transcription factor. Science. 288:2000;859-863
50. Kim J., et al. Functional characterization of Phytochrome Interacting Factor 3 in phytochrome-mediated light signal transduction. Plant Cell. 15:2003;2399-2407
51. Fankhauser C., et al. PKS1, a substrate phosphorylated by phytochrome that modulates light signaling in Arabidopsis. Science. 284:1999;1539-1541
52. Lariguet P., et al. A growth regulatory loop that provides homeostasis to phytochrome A signaling. Plant Cell. 15:2003;2966-2978
53. Freeman M. Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development. Nature. 408:2000;313-319
54. Hasty J., et al. Engineered gene circuits. Nature. 420:2002;224-230
55. Rao C.V., et al. Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise. Nature. 420:2002;231-236
56. Noselli S., Perrimon N. Are there close encounters between signaling pathways? Science. 290:2000;68-69