Prognostic value of motor evoked potentials in stroke motor outcome

Europa Medicophysica

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 125-130

  Nascimbeni, A ^a,c   Gaffuri, A ^a   Granella, L ^a   Colli, M ^b   Imazio, P ^b  

^a S CROCE E CARLE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular accident; Evoked potentials, motor; Magnetics; Prognosis; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; HUMAN; MEDLINE; PARALYSIS; PARESIS; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; STROKE;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; HUMANS; MAGNETICS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 26244442507     PISSN: 00142573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Barker AT, Jalinous R, Freeston IL. Non-invasive stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985;1:1106-7.
2. Mills KR. Magnetic stimulation of the human nervous system. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
3. Cruz Martinez A, Munoz J, Palacios F. The muscle inhibitory period by transcranial magnetic stimulation study in stroke patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;38:189-92.
4. Catano A, Houa M, Noël P. Magnetic transcranial stimulation: clinical interest of the silent period in acute and chronic stages of stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;105:290-6.
5. Classen J, Schnitzler A, Binkofski F, Werhaln KJ, Kim YS, Kessler KR et al. The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic stroke. Brain 1997;120,605-19.
6. Ahonen J-P, Jehkonen M, Dastidar P, Molnar G, Häkkinen V. Cortical silent period evoked by magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;109:224-9.
7. Braune HJ, Fritz C. Transcranial magnetic stimulation evoked inhibition of voluntary muscle activity (silent period) is impaired in patients with ischemic hemispheric lesion. Stroke 1995;26:550-3.
8. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Bassi A, Rossini PM, Bernardi G. Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. Stroke 1997;28: 110-7.
9. Byrnes ML, Thickbroom GW, Phillips BA, Mastaglia FL. Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke. Brain Res 2001;19:278-87.
10. Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganisation after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31:1210-6.
11. Liepert J, Graef S, Uhde I, Leidner O, Weillwer C. Training induced changes of motor cortex representation in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2000;101:321-6.
12. Nudo RJ, Birute MW, Fuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996;272:1791-4.
13. Calautti C, Baron JC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 2003;34:1553-66.
14. Trompetto C, Assini A, Buccolieri A, Marchese R, Abbruzzese G. Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:1860-7.
15. Alagona G, Delvaux V, De Pasqua PGV, Pennisi G, Delwaide PJ, Nicoletti F et al. Ipsilateral motor responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and acute stroke patients. Stroke 2001;32:1304-11.
16. Caramia MD, Palmieri MG, Giacomini P, Iani C, Dally L, Silvestrini M. Ipsilateral activation of the unaffected motor cortex in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:1990-6.
17. Netz J, Lammers T, Hömberg V. Reorganisation of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain 1997;120:1579-86.
18. Siebner HR, Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res 2003;148:1-16.
19. Kwakkel G, Wagenar R, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke. A critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996;25:479-89.
20. Shelton F, Reding MJ. Effect of lesion location on upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 2000;32:107-12.
21. Cruz Martinez A, Munoz J, Palacios F. The muscle inihibitory period by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Study in stroke patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;38:189-92.
22. Hendricks HT, Pasman JW, Van Limbeck J, Zwarts MJ. Motor evoked potentials in predicting recovery from upper extremity paralysis after acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;16:265-71.
23. Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Archer SA, Mastaglia FL. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:2025-9.
24. Turton A, Lemon RN. The contribution of fast corticospinal input to the voluntary activation of proximal muscles in normal subjects and in stroke patients. Exp Brain Res 1999;129:559-72.
25. Hendricks HT, Pasman JW, Merx JI, Van Limbeck J, Zwarts M. Analysis of recovery process after stroke by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;20:188-95.
26. Heald A, Bates D, Cartlidge NE, French JM, Miller S. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. Brain 1993:116: 1371-85.
27. Escudero JV, Sancho J, Bautista D, Escudero M, López-Trigo J. Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1998;29:1854-9.
28. Palliyath S. Role of central conduction time and motor evoked response amplitude in predicting stroke outcome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2000;40:315-20.
29. Vang C, Dunbabin D, Kilpatrick D. Correlation between functional and electrophysiological recovery in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1999;30:2126-30.
30. D'Olhaberriague L, Espadaler Gamissans JM, Marrugat J, Valls A, Oliveras Ley C, Seoane JL. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a prognostic tool in stroke. J Neurol Sci 1997;147:73-80.
31. Cruz Martinez A, Tejada J, Diez Tejedor E. Motor hand recovery after stroke: prognostic yield of early transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1999;39:405-10.
32. Catano A, Houa M, Caroyer JM, Ducarne H, Noel P. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in non-haemorrhagic sylvian strokes: interest of facilitation for early functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97:349-54.
33. Di Lazzaro V, Olivero A, Profice P, Saturno E, Pilato F, Tonali P. Motor cortex excitability changes within 8 hours after ischemic stroke may predict the functional outcome. Eur J Emerg Med 1999;6:119-21.
34. Hendricks HT, Hageman G, Van Limbeck J. Prediction of recovery from upper extremity paralysis after stroke by measuring evoked potentials. Scand J Rehab Med 1997;29:155-9.
35. Rapisarda G, Bastings E, Maertens de Noordhout A, Pennisi G, Delwaide PJ. Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? Stroke 1996;27: 2191-6.
36. Pennisi G, Rapisarda G, Bella R, Calabrese V, Maertens de Noordhout A, Delwaide PJ. Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients. Stroke 1999;30:2666-70.
37. Arac N, Sagduyu A, Binai S, Ertekin C. Prognostic value of transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute stroke. Stroke 1994;25:2183-6.
38. Feys H, Van Hees J, Bruyninckx F, Mercelis R, De Weerdt W. Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after stroke. J Neurol Nerosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:323-31.
39. Hendricks HT, Zwarts MJ, Plat EF, Van Limbeck J. Systematic review for the early prediction of motor and functional outcome after stroke by using motor-evoked potentials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1303-8.
40. Hendricks HT, Pasman JW, Van Limbeck J, Zwarts MJ. Motor evoked potentials of the lower extremity in predicting motor recovery and ambulation after stroke: a cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1373-9.
41. Steube D, Wietholter S, Correl C. Prognostic value of lower limb motor evoked potentials for motor impairment and disability after 8 weeks of stroke rehabilitation. A prospective investigation of 100 patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2001;41:463-9.
42. Nakayama H, Jørgesen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:394-8.
43. Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, Cox Steck GA, Spichiger R, Vereeck LE et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke. Stroke 1998;29: 785-92.
44. Seitz R, Azari N, Knorr U, Binkofski F, Herzog H, Freund HJ. The role of diaschis in stroke recovery. Stroke 1999;30:1844-50.
45. Freddi A. Penombra ischemica, ridondanza e plasticità nel ripristino della funzione. Proceedings of the International Congress Stroke Today; 2003 May 5-8; Spoleto, Italy.
46. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1996;75:2144-9.
47. Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris DM. Improved motor recovery after stroke and massive cortical reorganisation following constraint-induced movement therapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2003;14: S77-91.
48. Lee RG, Van Dankelaar P. Mechanisms underlying functional recovery following stroke. Can J Neurol Sci 1995;22:257-63.
49. Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Frost SB. Role of adaptive plasticity recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve 2001;24: 1000-19.
50. Johansson BB. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2000;31:223-30.