Role of central conduction time and motor evoked response amplitude in predicting stroke outcome

Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 315-320

  Palliyath, S ^a,b  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Neurology Department   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; HUMAN; MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PREDICTION; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; NEURAL CONDUCTION; PROGNOSIS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0033925496     PISSN: 0301150X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AHO, K., HATANO, S., MARQUARDSEN, J., SMIRNOV, V.E. and STRASSER, T: Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of WHO collaborative study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 58: 113-130,1980.
2. ALLEN, C. M. C.: Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: a prognostic score. J Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 47, 475-480, 1984.
3. ANDERSON, C.: Baseline measures and outcome predictions. Neuroepidemiology, 13 (6): 283-289, 1994.
4. BARKER, A. T., FREESTON, I. L., JALINOUS, R. and JARRETT, J. A.: Magnetic stimulation in clinical practice. In: Rossini, P. M. and Marsden, C. D. (eds.), Non-unvasive stimulation of Brain and Spinal Cord: Fundamentals and Clinical Applications. Alan R. Liss, New York, 231-241, 1988.
5. BERARDELLI, A., INGHILLERI, M., CRUCCU, G., MERCURI, B. and MANFREDI, M.: Electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation in patients with corticospinal damage due to stroke or motor neuron disease. Electrencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 81: 389-396, 1991.
6. BRIDGERS, S. L.: Magnetic cortical stimulation in stroke patients with hemiparesis. In: Chokroverty, S. (ed.), Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Neurophysiology. Butterworth, Boston, 233-247, 1990.
7. CAPPA, S. F., PERANI, D., GRASSI, F., BRESSI, S., ALBERONI, M., FRANCESCHI, M., BETTINARDI, V., TODDE, S. and FAZIO, F.: A PET follow-up study of recovery after stroke in aphasies. Brain & Language, 56 (1): 55-67, 1997
8. CHOLLET, F., DI PIERO, V., WISE, R. J. S., BROOKS, D. J., DOLAN, R. J. and FRANCKOWIAK, R. S. J.: The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann. Neurol., 29: 63-71, 1991.
9. COLEBATCH, J. G. and GANDEVIA, S. C.: The distribution of muscular weakness in the upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. Brain, 112: 749-763, 1989.
10. DOMINKUS, M., GRISOLD, W. and JELINEK, V.: Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials as a prognostic indicator for motor recovery in stroke patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. and Psychiat., 53: 745-748, 1990.
11. ESCUDERO, J. V., SANCHO, J., BAUTISTA, D., ESCUDERO, M. and LOPEZ-TRIGO, J.: Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke, 29: 1854-1859, 1998.
12. HALLETT, M , COHEN, L. G., NILSSON, J. and PANNIZA, M.: Difference between the electrical and magnetic nerve stimulation of peripheral nerve and motor cortex. In: Chokroverty, S. (ed.), Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Neurophysiology. Butterworth, Boston, 275-285, 1989.
13. HEALD, A., BATES, D., CARTLIDGE, N. E. F., FRENCH, T. M. and MILLER, S.: Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 1. Natural history of central motor conduction. Brain, 116: 1355-1370, 1993.
14. HEALD, A., BATES, D., CARTLIDGE, N. E. F., FRENCH, T. M. and MILLER, S.: Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. Brain, 116: 1371-1385, 1993.
15. INGRAM, D. A. and SWASH. M.: Central conduction is abnormal in motor neuron diseases. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 50: 159-166, 1987.
16. LA JOIE, W. J., REDDY, N. M. and MELVIN, J. L.: Somatosensory evoked potentials: their predictive value in right hemiplegia. Arc. of Phys. Med. and Rehab., 63: 223-226, 1982.
17. MACDONELL, R. A. L. DONNAN, G. A. and BLADIN, P. F.: A comparison of somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials in stroke. Ann. Neurol., 25: 68-73, 1989.
18. MURRAY, N. F.: Magnetic stimulation of the brain: clinical applications. In: Chokroverty, S. (ed.), Magnetic Stimulation in Clinical Neurophysiology. Butterworths, Boston, 215-231, 1990.
19. PANTANO, P., FORMISANO, R., RICCI, M., DI PIERO, V., SABATANI, U., DI POFI, B., BOZZAO, L. and LENZI, G. L.: Motor recovery after stroke. Morphological and functional alterations. Brain, 119: 1849-1857, 1996.
20. RAPISARDA, G., BASINGS, E., NOORDHOUT, M., PENNISI, G. and DELAWAIDE, P. J.: Can motor recovery in stroke be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? Stroke, 27: 2191-2196.
21. STEIGER, H. J.: Outcome of acute supratentorial cerebral infarction in patients under 60. Development of a prognostic grading system. Acta Neurochirurgica, 111 (3-4): 73-79, 1991.
22. ZEMAN, B. D. and YIANNIKAS, C.: Functional prognosis in stroke: use of somatosensory evoked potentials. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. and Psychiat., 2: 242-247, 1989.