Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 323-331

  Feys, Hilde ^a   Van Hees, Johan ^a   Bruyninckx, Frans ^b   Mercelis, Rudy ^c   De Weerdt, Willy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Evoked potentials; Prognosis; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISABILITY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; MUSCLE TONE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0034017092     PISSN: 00223050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.68.3.323     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Wade DT, Langton Hewer R, Wood VA, et al. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983;46:521-24.
2. Parker VM, Wade DT, Langton Hewer R. Loss of arm function after stroke: measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med 1986;8:69-73.
3. Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1990;21:247-51.
4. Nakayama H, Jörgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:394-8.
5. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, et al. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:714-19.
6. Gowland C. Predicting sensorimotor recovery following stroke rehabilitation. Physiotherapy Canada 1984;36:313-20.
7. De Weerdt W, Lincoln NB, Harrison MA. Prediction of arm and hand function recovery in stroke patients. Int J Rehabil Res 1987;10:110-2.
8. Zeman BD, Yiannikas C. Functional prognosis in stroke: use of somatosensory evoked potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:242-7.
9. Chester CS, McLaren CE. Somatosensory evoked response and recovery from stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70: 520-5.
10. Macdonell RAL, Donnan GA, Bladin PF. A comparison of somatosensory evoked and motor evoked potentials in stroke. Ann Neurol 1989;25:68-73.
11. Gott PS, Karnaze DS, Fisher M. Assessment of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in cerebral ischemia. Stroke 1990;21:1167-71.
12. Kovala T. Prognostic significance of somatosensory potentials evoked by stimulation of the median and posterior tibial nerves: a prospective 1 year follow up study in patients with supratentorial cerebral infarction. Eur Neurol 1991;31:141-8.
13. Chu N, Wu T. Motor response patterns and prognostic value of transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients. In: Lissens MA, ed. Clinical applications of magnetic transcranial stimulation. Leuven: Peeters Press, 1992:127-45.
14. Keren O, Ring H, Solzi P, et al. Upper limb somatosensory evoked potentials as a predictor of rehabilitation progress in dominant hemisphere stroke patients. Stroke 1993;24: 1789-93.
15. Péréon Y, Aubertin P, Guihéneuc P. Prognostic significance of electrophysiological investigations in stroke patients: somatosensory and motor evoked potentials and sympathetic skin response. Neurophysiol Clin 1995;25:146-57.
16. Timmerhuis TPJ, Hageman G, Oosterloo SJ, et al. The prognostic value of cortical magnetic stimulation in acute middle cerebral artery infarction compared to other parameters. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1996;98:231-6.
17. La Joie WJ, Reddy NM, Melvin JL. Somatosensory evoked potentials: their predictive value in right hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:223-6.
18. Hendricks HT, Pasman JW, Mulder T, et al. Value of somatosensory evoked potentials for the prediction of motor recovery of the upper extremity after cerebral infarction. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences 1994;7:3-8.
19. Hendricks HT, Hageman G, Van Limbeck J. Prediction of recovery of upper extremity paralysis after stroke by measuring evoked potentials. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997;29:155-9.
20. Barker AT, Freeston IL, Jalinous R, et al. Magnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: an introduction and the results of an initial clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery 1987;20:100-9.
21. Arac N, Sagduyu A, Binai S, et al. Prognostic value of transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute stroke. Stroke 1994; 25:2183-6.
22. Rapisarda G, Bastings E, Maertens de Noordhout A, et al. Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? Stroke 1996;27:2191-6.
23. Catano A, Houa M, Caroyer JM, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in acute stroke: early excitation threshold and functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;101:233-9.
24. D'Olhaberriague L, Gamissans JE, Marrugat J, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a prognostic tool in stroke. J Neurol Sci 1997;147:73-80.
25. Heald A, Bates D, Cartlidge NEF, et al. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. Brain 1993;116:1371-85.
26. van Rijckevorsel-Harmant K, Boon V, de Barsy T. Central magnetic stimulation, somatosensory potentials, and clinical evolution during a rehabilitation treatment in hemiplegic patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; S102.
27. Catano A, Houa M, Caroyer JM, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in non-haemorrhagic sylvian strokes: interest of facilitation for early functional prognosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;97:349-54.
28. Dominkus M, Grisold W, Jelinek V. Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials as a prognostic indicator for motor recovery in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:745-8.
29. Zgur T, Prevec TS, Goljar N. Correlation of motor evoked potentials to motor deficit during the recovery of ischaemic stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;S102.
30. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31.
31. Cracco RQ. Evaluation of conduction in central motor pathways: techniques, pathophysiology, and clinical interpretation. Neurosurgery 1987;20:199-203.
32. Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner 1964;192:540-2.
33. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:64-7.
34. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, et al. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther 1993;73:447-54.
35. Sloan RL, Sinclair E, Thompson J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the modified Ashworth scale for spasticity in hemiplegic patients. Int J Rehabil Res 1992;15:158-61.
36. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the modified motor assessment scale and the Barthel index. Phys Ther 1988;68:1077-81.
37. De Weerdt WJG, Harrison MA. Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: a comparison of the Brunnström-Fugl-Meyer test and the action research test. Physiotherapy Canada 1985;37:65-70.
38. Chiappa KH. Short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: methodology. In: Chiappa Kh, ed. Evoked potentials in clinical medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997:283-339.
39. Eisen AA, Shtybel W. Clinical experience with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Muscle Nerve 1990;13:995-1011.
40. Freund RJ, Litell RC. SAS system for regression. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1991.
41. Feys HM, De Weerdt WJ, Selz BE, et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke. A single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke 1998;29:785-92.