Investigating the effects of oral output on the learning of relative clauses in English: Issues in the psycholinguistic requirements for effective output tasks

Canadian Modern Language Review

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 587-609

  Izumi, Yukiko ^b   Izumi, Shinichi ^a  

^a SOPHIA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25844457705     PISSN: 00084506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.60.5.587     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. DeKeyser, R., & Sokalski, K. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46, 613-641.
3. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
4. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Izumi, S. (2000). The effects of output and input enhancement on the noticing and learning of relativization in English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
7. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
8. Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 168-196.
9. Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239-278.
10. Izumi, S, Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M., & Fearnow, S. (1999). Testing the output hypothesis: Effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 421-452.
11. Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the French immersion classroom? In R. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 284-309). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kramer, S., & Rosenthal, R. (1999). Effect sizes and significance levels in small-sample research. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
14. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
15. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
18. Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Penguin.
19. Muraoka, Y. (2000). The role of oral output in the acquisition of English relative clauses. Unpublished masters thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
20. Muraoka, Y. (2001, February). The role of oral output in the L2 acquisition of relative clauses in English. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, St. Louis, MO.
21. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
22. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
23. Sanz, C. (1997). Experimental tasks in SLA research: Amount of production, modality, memory, and production process. In W. Glass & A. Perez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish (pp. 41-56). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
24. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
25. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
26. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. Widdowson (pp. 125-44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 26, 371-391.
29. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 99-118). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
30. Trahey, M., & White, L (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181-203.
31. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.
33. VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225-243.
34. VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
35. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Wilkinson, L., Hill, M., & Vang, E. (1992). SYSTAT: Statistics, Version 5.2. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT.