On the design of optimally informative dynamic experiments for model discrimination in multiresponse nonlinear situations

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1379-1390

  Chen, Bing H ^a   Asprey, Steven P ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FERMENTATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; YEAST;

MULTIRESPONSE SITUATIONS;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

DESIGN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DYNAMIC MODEL; DYNAMICS; EXPERIMENT; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FED BATCH REACTOR; FERMENTATION TECHNIQUE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICS; MODEL; MULTIRESPONSE NONLINEAR SITUATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; OPTIMALLY INFORMATIVE DYNAMIC EXPERIMENT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0041846841     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie0203025     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hunter, W. G.; Reiner, A. M. Designs for Discriminating Between Two Rival Models. Technometrics 1965, 7, 307.
2. Box, G. E. P.; Hill, W. J. Discrimination Among Mechanistic Models. Technometrics 1966, 9, 57.
3. Reilly, P. W. Statistical Methods in Model Discrimination. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1970, 48, 168.
4. Buzzi-Ferraris, G.; Forzatti, P. A New Sequential Experimental Design Procedure for Discriminating Among Rival Models. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1983, 38, 225.
5. Buzzi-Ferraris, G.; Forzatti, P. Sequential Experimental Design for Model Discrimination in the Case of Multiple Responses. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1984, 39, 81.
6. Buzzi-Ferraris, G.; Forzatti, P.; Canu, P. An Improved Version of a Sequential Design Criterion of Discriminating Among Rival Response Models. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1990, 39, 81.
7. Espie, D. M.; Macchietto, S. The Optimal Design of Dynamic Experiments. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 223.
8. Stewart, W. E.; Shon, Y.; Box, G. E. P. Discrimination and Goodness of Fit of Multiresponse Mechanistic Models. AIChE J. 1998, 44, 1404.
9. Singh, S. Model Selection for a Multirespons System. Ind. Chem. Eng. A 1999, 77, 138.
10. Buzzi-Ferraris, G. Planning of Experiments and Kinetic Analysis. Catal. Today 1999, 52, 125.
11. Asprey, S. P.; Macchietto, S. Statistical Tools for Optimal Dynamic Model Building. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 1261.
12. Bard, Y. Nonlinear Parameter Estimation; Academic Press: London, 1974.
13. Seber, G. A. F.; Wild, C. J. Nonlinear Regression; Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics; John Wiley & Sons: Toronto, Canada, 1989.
14. Box, G. E. P. A General Distribution Theory for a Class of Likelihood Criteria. Biometrika 1949, 36, 317.
15. Box, G. E. P.; Henson, T. L. Model Fitting and Discrimination; Department of Statistics Technical Report 211; University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI, 1969.
16. Box, G. E. P.; Henson, T. L. Some Aspects of Mathematical Modeling in Chemical Engineering. In Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference of the Scientific Computation Centre and the Institute of Statistical Studies and Research; Cairo University Press: Cairo, Egypt, 1970; p 548.
17. Prichard, D. J.; Bacon, D. W. Statistical Assessment of Kinetic Models. Chem Eng. Sci. 1975, 30, 567.
18. Burke, A. L.; Deuver, T. A.; Penlidis, A. Discriminating Between the Terminal and Penultimate Models Using Designed Experiments: An Overview. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 1016.
19. Espie, D. M. The Use of Nonlinear Parameter Estimation for Dynamic Chemical Reactor Modelling. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, London, U.K., 1986.
20. Hunter, W. G.; Reiner, A. M. Designs for Discriminating Between Two Rival Models. Technometrics 1965, 7, 307.
21. Cooney, M. J.; McDonald, K. A. Optimal Dynamic Experiments for Bioreactor Model Discrimination. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1995, 43, 826.
22. Uesbeck, F.; Samsatli, N. J.; Papageorgiou, L. G.; Shah, N. Robust Optimal Fermentation Operating Policies. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1998, 22, S167.
23. Nihtila, M.; Virkunnen, J. Practical Identiflability of Growth and Substrate Consumption Models. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1977, 19, 1831.
24. Asprey, S. P.; S. Macchietto. Designing Robust Optimal Dynamic Experiments. J. Process Control 2002, 12, 545.
25. Vassiliadis, V. S.; Sargent, R. W. H.; Pantelides, C. C. Solution of a Class of Multistage Dynamic Optimization Problems 1: Problems without Path Constraints. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 2111.
26. Zullo, L. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, London, U.K., 1991.
27. Körkel, S.; Bauer, I.; Bock, H. G.; Schlöder, J. P. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Scientific Computing in Chemical Engineering; Springer: Berlin, 1999; Vol. II, p 338.
28. Keifer, J.; J. Wolfowitz. Optimum Designs in Regression Problems Ann Math Stat 1959 30 271
29. Ljung, L. System Identification: Theory for the User; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.
30. Goodwin, G. C.; Payne, R. L. Dynamic System Identification: Experiment Design and Data Analysis; Academic Press: New York, 1977.
31. Shirt, R. W.; Harris, T. J.; Bacon, D. W. Experimental Design Considerations for Dynamic Systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 2656.
32. Zarrop, M. B. Optimal Experiment Design for Dynamic System Identification; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1979.
33. Wojciechowski, B. W.; Asprey, S. P. Kinetic Studies Using Temperature-Scanning: the Oxidation of Carbon Monoxide. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2000, 190, 1.
34. Bermingham, S. K. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2002.
35. Asprey, S. P.; Mantalaris, A. Global Parametric Identifiability of a Dynamic Unstructured Model of Hybridoma Cell Culture. In Proceedings of the 8th IFAC International Conference on Computer Applications in Biotechnology (CAB.8); Elsevier Science: New York, 2001, p 25.
36. Sanderson, C. S.; Barford, J. P.; Barton, G. W. A structured, dynamic model for animal cell culture systems. Biochem. Eng. J. 1999, 3, 203.
37. Hill, W. J.; Hunter, W. G.; Wichern, D. W. A Joint Criterion for the Dual Problem of Model Discrimination and Parameter Estimation. Technometrics 1968, 10, 145.